Simon’s latest post on this 9/11 show brings back memories. While I didn’t listen to the Stern show live on 9/11/2001 I do credit Stern for having Jesse Ventura on sometime in 2012 and getting my ball rolling into the 9/11 psyOp adventure.
While both personas may be willing and/or complicit actors in the whole psyOp, without them I wouldn’t be in this game.
My only other previous comment on Stern’s 9/11 show is that show persona Crazy Cabbie, who did audio commentary from a rooftop watching the WTC “chaos” “live”, disappeared from the airwaves sometime shortly after.
Where would be without the gatekeepers? Are they all bad or do they do enough good by offering a few nuggets of truth to at least get people talking about psyOps? Discuss among yourselves below.
Indeed – this chapter of history can now be closed.
I trust that anyone who sets aside some time and patience to read through this NUKE HOAX thread will come to the conclusion that we have all been taken for a ride for the best part of this century – and that it is high time to lay this explosively silly mass deception to rest. Is the multinational nuclear hoax still unclear to anyone? Do you still have any reasons to doubt that all those ‘atomic bomb’ tests were nothing but crude cinematic fabrications? If so, here is a series of ‘firsts’ – which purportedly depict past A&H-bomb tests of various nations :
Fukushima is the first (and hopefully last) of the nuclear accident PsyOps of the internet age. 9/11 has made us aware of media fakery on a grand scale and the internet allows us to collate the evidence on a worldwide basis.
Where Three Mile Island and Chernobyl were foggy and fairly media-less events, at least we have a few more media pieces and far more scrutineers to pick them apart.
Below it ooks like I found Roger Desjardins. He is the engineer that Rae referred to on ep35 at radio.abirato.info. I’ve invited him on the show to continue our nuclear (hocus pocus) focus.
Here he berates a nuclear actor: Hey Arnie, tell us about dump loads. Tell us how fake nuclear reactors are actually boiling off excess electricity and not producing a single watt on it’s own. Tell us how the control room instrumentation are reporting the dumped energy as a positive value. Tell us where the distribution grid excess is being dumped if not in fake commercially-viable nuclear energy production plants. Tell us about the toaster-element-like core that is no more reactive than those in our household convection ovens. Tell us what kind of insane power grid designer would neglect to incorporate a system whereby the 5 billion-dollar so-called nuclear reactor can continue providing power to those people that paid for them when conventionally-produced electrical generating plants on the distribution grid are blacked out? Tell us why all the reactors in a given blackout perimeter fail alongside the coal and hydro if they are not in fact dumping power, not producing it? Here is my email Arnie, in case you might like to debate this in a public forum: firstname.lastname@example.org I can prove the industry is bogus. Commercially-viable nuclear energy production is not viable at all and was never implimented. Lets debate the kind of groups that would have the power to con humanity so thoroughly. Lets talk about wjo has the means the motives and opportunities to pass dump loads off as power generating plants.
Nuclear Engineer Analyzes Current Condition of Fukushima Reactors 1-3, Unit 4 Pool and Monitoring of Fish | MidnightWatcher’s Blogspot
We will stop talking about this 9/11 thing when THEY do. New York to resume search for 9-11 remains | World | News | Toronto Sun www.torontosun.com/2013/03/29/… My guess is they won’t stop. How can you ignore the main psyop (so far) of modern times?
More blurring of the reality/hoaxing/fakery continuum. The whole nature of the internet’s design is a web. Breaking one strand of the web does nothing to its integrity. Yes some strands may be wider than others but creating a collapse or widespread chaos is impossible due to its design. Let’s not let the facts get in the way of a good (fake) story. We are so inundated with deception at every level it’s no wonder it is so difficult to separate fact from fiction. Spamhaus internet attack: was it all a PR stunt? | Technology | The Guardian www.guardian.co.uk/technology/…