It is a fundamental mistake to see the enemy as a set of targets. The enemy in war is a group of people. Some of them will have to be killed. Others will have to be captured or driven into hiding. The overwhelming majority, however, have to be persuaded. — Frederick Kagan
Yes, I still listen to Fetzer. He does have interesting guests – even if some or even most are shills. As a researcher, you have to hear everyone that’s out there, since they’re influencing people you may meet and have to try and convince.
It seems Fetzer is turning his focus towards this very thorny topic — the Holocaust. It may be one of the most heavily guarded psyOp of the past 100 years. I agree with Fetzer that nothing should be off limits or even illegal to research.
This audio, with its guest’s accompanying pdf, was quite a good summation of some of the many anomalies regarding WW2 and the Nazi concentration camps.
I’ve always been fascinated with Holocaust research, mainly because in Canada we’ve been told it’s too dangerous to talk about it at all. Early on, one of my favorite politically incorrect columnists was Doug Collins. He got into trouble for simply publishing the words “Swindlers list”, in reference to Spielberg‘s movie Shindlers List. He was dragged through a human rights tribunal trial, and eventually his name was smeared for questioning it.
Canadians were also bombarded with the Zundel trial. While I was a little too young to understand what was happening at the time, it did draw attention to the Holocaust, equating anyone who questioned it, as we are told Zundel did, to a kook with a funny German accent wearing a construction helmet.
It was implied to me quite recently that Zundel himself may have been part of a discrediting psyop. The purpose of this psyop could have been to pass hate laws in Canada to prevent discussion around or about WW2. By taking a fairly odd character, adding an obscure revisionist publication, and then finding an unused and arcane law, they created an event that eventually made talking about the Holocaust virtually illegal. If it isn’t illegal, the fear is placed or the perception managed to the point where it may as well be. Therein lies the true power of psychological operations.
There aren’t two people I’ve listened to more on 9/11: Jim Fetzer and Simon Shack. This is mainly because no two researchers have spent more time up to today talking about it.
That said, I’ve long ago determined through many helpful researchers that Prof. Fetzer refuses to see the logic in discarding clearly fabricated media to reach all of his “scientific” conclusions. It is for this reason he can only be considered delusional or more than likely controlled opposition. You only need to have credentials in critical thinkingto determine that if you build a house on a faulty foundation then it will fall down quickly upon examination.
Fetzer’s latest “beyond a reasonable doubt” conclusion that 9/11/WTC was a neutron mini-nuke event is simply a hoax built upon an older hoax. (hoax²) The preposterous leap that a magical weapon that could destroy an entire building complex, including one million tons of 2 buildings in 9/11 seconds is beyond sorcery, yet he persists.
Allright, ladies and gentlemen – the mystery is solved! Bring out the champagne!
See, mini-nukes were used to bring down the towers. Yup. At least, that’s what Dr Fetzer and a trio of ‘nuke-experts’ have now determined, apparently with utmost certainty and“beyond all reasonable doubt”. No kidding. A few exerpts:
I still find the variety of guests on Fetzer’s show interesting, so I will still listen with a critical ear. When it comes to his JFK-9/11 research, I usually fast forward or skip altogether. I do thank his show for equating 9/11 and JFK in my mind, and revealing what few ever talk about — that JFK was also a completely fabricated event — complete with a mountain of phony photos and of course the famous Zapruder fake film.