Is the Earth Flat?

Be the 1st to vote.

When you first find out you’ve been lied to by someone, what’s the second question you ask?

The first one is, of course, “why?”

The second one is, of course, “what else have you been lying to me about?”

So, since most here agree we’ve been lied to about WW2, JFK, NASA/Apollo, RFK, MLK, Waco, Oklahoma City, Columbine, 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston, just to name a few, how deep do you dare dig?

The Earth is Flat r10 – YouTube.

So what if the earth really is the center of the universe? What if the Sun revolves around the earth? What if the UN flag shows the real picture of this planet we’re living on? If this is the mother of all psyOps, are its purposes the same as all the small ones? That is, fear and money?

Why aren’t our children taught our human history, that is to say that for thousands of years we thought the earth was flat, and it’s only recently that this thinking changed? Why isn’t it common knowledge that Copernicus’ model was adopted by the newly formed Church of England, and made the official position?

flatearthflatearth2

Why are the most monumental moments in our history, when great change occurred, glossed over in our schools as single lines in textbooks? I believe the reason is that fresh, unadulterated minds might come to different conclusions if allowed to form on their own. It’s hard to think in a mental
straightjacket!

On the map of the UN, does anyone see where Antarctica went to? That’s another can of worms that needs flushing out.

 

Just look at the links below, to see what our minds are being bombarded with when it comes to space questions: all nonsense.

English: Nicolaus Copernicus ?Norsk (bokmål)â?...

English: Nicolaus Copernicus ?Norsk (bokmål)â?¬: Nikolaus Kopernicus, (født 19. februar 1473, død 24. mai 1543) europeisk astronom, matematiker og lege. Polski: Miko?aj Kopernik (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

9 thoughts on “Is the Earth Flat?

  1. Blue Moon

    Needing to wed causation and proximity can contort thinking- Gravity is not dependent on a spinning earth- Gravity is the relationship between the center of two bodies relative to each other- Jump off a low roof and you are momentarily weightless because you’ve changed the relationship between your physical center and the earth’s- The spin, if stopped, would make the gravitational pull a little stronger (you’d probably break both legs rather than sprain an ankle) The moon doesn’t spin on an axis but the gravitational relationship between earth and moon drags the moon along and affects the tides as we spin, which also, in my un-cited opinion is what helps percolate living matter and constant change- A flat earth would not have this kind of atmosphere and would not produce the array of life as it is, nor would a moonless sky maintain the same gravitational force we experience on earth nor would a non-spinning earth result in these particular planetary conditions- The concepts of spin, gravity etc. are containers to sort out and properly index various predictable phenomena- I don’t see these “laws” as inherently evil but they are susceptible to manipulation simply as concepts when one person or many don’t take the time to test the veracity of these “laws”-
    One clue that the earth is round and spinning is that one is slightly heavier in weight at the poles and slightly lighter at the equator- Plus there is a bulging out at the equator and a flattening at the poles, presumably because of the wide spin of the equator and tight spin up top at the axis-
    The flat earth hypothesis suffers from the fallacy of sense certainty- That which we subjectively experience in the physical world (we can’t see anything but flatness) is objectified (we can’t see it therefore it doesn’t exist) This is the gateway to madness- I blame Emmanuel Kant and his philosophical spawn for Einstein and this secular religion known as relativistic physics- Kant et al were inevitable after the age of enlightenment when the church lost its grip on its exclusive interpretation of the phenomenal world- Kant repurposed the now deposed notion of top down divine authority into an incoherent mangle of sense stimulus and called that objective reality- If the church can’t control reality then no one else will, either- It’s the greatest controlled demolition of reason and critical thought processes since religion itself-
    That stated, one observable phenomenon that IS the result of subjective observation but seems all too real and objective is the changing size of the moon relative to our vision- Unlike a pocket camera, with a single fixed lens, we see in a parallax condition, with two separate lenses slightly apart which allows us to focus on great distances or see close up when reading- The effect is like an elaborate telephoto lens in a movie being racked where a face in the foreground suddenly goes out of focus and the blurry face in the background is now clear and seems closer than it is to the foreground face- When the moon is low on the horizon, I believe, our points of reference to the earth relative to this rising moon rack focuses our eyes involuntarily to perceive the moon is larger and therefore closer- The higher it gets from our earth bound references, the further away it seems and therefore we process it as being smaller- The single lens pocket camera can’t shift focus and therefore is never fooled- The moon is always registered as small and fixed in the distance-
    Of course we weren’t taught alternative belief systems because to be good sheeple we need to be told certain verifiable facts so we don’t develop idiotic notions like thinking we can fly without a plane or drink water from a fetid swamp or mate with our pets- We’re “human resources”, after all, and need some basic maintenance- But I worry that default positioning as false anything that is supported by the elite mindbenders will lead to what used to be called “anti-intellectualism” but what is now more accurately defined as “uncritical thinking”- Discussion is the way to avoid that-

    1. jhenningkelloggia

      you operate under the delusion that gravity and magnetism have a relationship one with the other… they dont… the Moon has no magnetic relationship with the earth what so ever.. if it did… we’d all be in a lot of trouble.. magnetism does not work that way… ever… nobody has ever tested this ridiculous notion that the Earth and the Moon are magnetic… ever…
      magnets dont orbit each other… they stick to one another

      1. Blue Moon

        Jhenningkelloggia- If you are responding to my screed above, where in it do I use the word ‘magnetism’? My understanding is that the moon is dragged along by the turning earth through ‘gravity’- No magnetism needed- It’s like when a large truck drives by at a healthy speed and my hat goes flying after it-

  2. Gabriel

    I agree with Ab’s point, why weren’t we told about the different possibilities in school? I believe its likely the earth is flat but cannot know for sure because I do not have a way to prove it. It makes more sense to me that it is though. So many truths to be found.

  3. Aaron

    Thanks for the post, Tim. I’ve suspected for a while that the earth might be flat. It’s nice to see confirmation from another critical thinker out there. I’ve been planning to do an experiment looking through a telescope to try and prove it, similar to this: www.sacred-texts.com…

    If this experiment checks out . . . holy crap! We might really be on to something.

    1. ab Post author

      I just want to have the discussion. I only think it’s a big ball because that’s what I am told all along. I’ve been told a lot of things that I’ve had to toss in the garbage. Could this be another one? Don’t know. Glad so many have the same question.

    1. aj

      How can you be so certain earth isn’t flat? I believe it is. It makes way more sense than it being a round planet rotating around the sun. NASA has given us fake outer space pictures so why should we believe their claim that earth is round?

Leave a Reply