ep64-911 and Mozart with Robert Newman

Be the 1st to vote.

audio_mp3_button

ep64-911-and-Mozart-with-Robert Newman

 

 Showtime: Saturday, September 21, 0611h EDT 

A morning show to accommodate our UK guest Robert Newman.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_E…

The Age of Enlightenment (or simply the Enlightenment or Age of Reason) was acultural movement of intellectuals beginning in the late 17th and 18th century Europe emphasizing reason and individualism rather than tradition.[1] Its purpose was to reform society using reason, challenge ideas grounded in tradition and faith, and advance knowledge through the scientific method. It promoted scientific thought, skepticism and intellectual interchange.[2] It opposed superstition and intolerance, with the Catholic church a favorite target. Some Enlightenment philosophes collaborated with Enlightened despots, who were absolute rulers who tried out some of the new governmental ideas in practice. The ideas of the Enlightenment have had a long-term major impact on the culture, politics, and governments of the Western world.

tywkiwdbi.blogspot.ca/2008/05/…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfur…

The Frankfurt School (GermanFrankfurter Schule) was a school ofneo-Marxist interdisciplinary social theory,[1] associated in part with theInstitute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt am Main. The school initially consisted of dissident Marxists who believed that some of Marx‘s followers had come to parrot a narrow selection of Marx’s ideas, usually in defense of orthodox Communist parties. Meanwhile, many of these theorists believed that traditional Marxist theory could not adequately explain the turbulent and unexpected development of capitalist societies in the twentieth century. Critical of both capitalism and Soviet socialism, their writings pointed to the possibility of an alternative path to social development.[2]

 

No tags for this post.

6 thoughts on “ep64-911 and Mozart with Robert Newman

  1. Herge DegrelleHerge Degrelle

    These Mozart & Beatles shows are completely pointless conspiracy hobbyism. ‘Collective Creation’ by mysterious super power elites and their designated genius Theodore Adorno type men-behind-the men is a fraud. There is an obvious consistency of quality and theme in ALL of MosesZionArt’s muse-ak, same with the Mophead 4. The last part was just word play. I don’t for one second think that if Jews could put together music of the quality of Mozart’s from behind the scenes, they would refrain from using his reputation as public relations for merits that their religious teachings don’t posses (mostly instructions on how to rip off the goyim) by portraying him a Jew, like Saint Einstein. Why would they designate for themselves only Mahler as their best representative, when they could also have Mozart. This can only mean that one mind, spirit and perspective made these creations, Mozart himself and they could not counterfeit the man. Even in the Beatles, most of Lennon’s stuff was written by Lennon with some little help from Paul & vice versa, though they both decided beforehand to always give themselves equal credit on everything.
    In other words, the ‘auteur’ theory stands, far more in music than in film and who cares which brain created it, you can bet it was rarely more than 2 brains at the same time and hardly ever many brains at the same time like some jamming rock band. Creation is an individual thing and it’s only later that many creations synergize together in society to push things to another level. Writing a piece of music like Beethoven’s 9th is well within the reach of an individual. People like Mozart and Beethoven have lived within our times. Look at how prolific Zappa was. McGowan’s military industrial complex didn’t write FZ’s music, FZ did. It’s obvious from his personality that the music is an extension of it.
    Haven’t you noticed that even the best Zeppelin & Beatles imitators, like Suck & Badfinger, sound different enough to be identified as fakes ? Yes. Even Stevie Ray Vaughan’s Voodoo Chile imitation was clearly distinguishable. Doing perfect fakes are a lot harder to do with music than with paintings and such. America sounds like CSN&Y but it is not, etc. Bands are self-contained synergetic units of one or two individual creators, sometimes three and a couple of craftsmanly hangers-ons that fill in some texture in the painting after its mostly done.

    On some of the old Wings songs though, Denny Laine sounds almost exactly like McCartney

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MuvJH…

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E0dFb…

  2. laura24lb

    I found this show listed on the “Mami’s Shit” website and this is the first show I listened to. Wonderful show! I’m going to keep listening. Keep up the great work.

  3. aralseaaralsea

    I have not much to say on Mozart. What about Bach etc. Are they all composites of a greater whole. Like Hipgnosis Art Group? I have wondered at the prolific works of Lennon/McCartney and the high quality of it all. I think it is possible for these guys to produce such great quality and quantity of music in a short period of time. Their generation did not spend hours in front of a Television so their minds and spirits were more active and natural and thus a great atmosphere for creativity. But it is suspect as well. And what about The Rolling Stones, Beach Boys, Bob Dylan? Who is created and who is grass roots real?

    1. rickpotvin

      I play piano and have studied chord changes since 1992– about 20 years now. There are entire philosophy deparments we can find, online, that study Beatles songs. The chord changes in Beatles songs could not possibly have been invented by young men in England working as a new band. From the 1950’s style rock to the Beatles occurred in a way that can only have been contrived by experts in backrooms using the Beatles as their front– as their stage. When I look at chord changes of songs of the 40’s or 30’s, I see specific repeated patterns that all the great music was based on. Even Classical music has its predictable patterns. I’m not sure what mental transformation of code occurred overall– with Beatles chord changes but John and Paul NEVER talked about that.. THE most important element of the music. Thus the were NOT part of the invention. They parlayed it– by performing it. But it had to have been invented behind the scenes… like at the Tavistock Institute for example.

      Strawberry Fields demonstrates a pattern of chord changes that is absolutely astounding from a Classical analysis point of view.

      A G6
      Let me take you down ’cause I’m going to Strawberry Fields.
      F#7
      Nothing is real.
      D F#7
      And nothing to hung about.
      D A
      Strawberry Fields forever.

      In Roman Numbers, we see I – bVII – VI – IV – VI…. IV – I

      Now it takes a musician and someone who has heard this tune to appreaciate the bVII to the VI where “nothing is real”. The odd angle of this transition from bVII to VI is so strange that “nothing is real” SOUNDS ethereal. More oddly, moving from IV to VI again on “nothing to to hung about” makes VI sound perfectly normal. How can VI sound “unreal” and “nothing to get hung about” depending on whether it comes from bVII or IV? This is truly amazing and weird. How could the younger Beatles have hit on that? I think the chord context was invented not by the Beatles but rather by experts in harmonics and psychology behind closed doors and delivered to Beatles performers.

      I DO buy the Mozart as fake argument because I’ve played early and later Mozart on piano and I can comprehend the scale of what was done by the guy whose life was cut short. Given 9/11 and the moon hoax and “useful myth”, it now appears to me Mozart was “useful myth”.

      1. ab Post author

        Great analysis Rick. I am impressed with your chord commentary. Such a brilliant point that Paul and John didn’t mention it. I wonder how many writers there were for the Beatles and Mozart?

  4. ab Post author

    henrymakow.com/the_all_caps_gr…

    Doubtless, the ALL CAPS NAME on birth and other certificates have legal ramifications.

    However, when you ask around about it in legal circles, you are likely to discover that no one seems to know what they are. Perchance, if you do find an attorney who has learned the lesson ? that is, out of school ? don’t be shocked if he is not forthright telling you what he knows . . . especially within earshot of his cronies.
    – See more at: henrymakow.com/the_all_caps_gr…

Leave a Reply