Daily Archives: October 18, 2013

Even the good news is faked

Be the 1st to vote.

I like a good news (real) story as much as the next guy (even though they don’t get much attention), but they have to be real.

The customer’s note gently explained why the daughter was crying: she took a phone call mid-meal — and was given an unspecified medical diagnosis.

I’m not a doctor, and I’ve never been “diagnosed”, but I’m pretty sure diagnoses are NOT given outside a doctor’s office.

ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/good-n…

So much easier and cheaper to make news up I suppose.

No tags for this post.

Can I even say Hitler?

Be the 1st to vote.

If you’re as dazed and confused about WW2 and Hitler as I am, you’ll do well by getting the other side of the story at a fellow Canadian’s site called Justice for Germans.

My main reservation on Hitler is that he was a world leader, and I have such distrust of all leaders put before us anywhere on the planet that I can only wonder if he was just as contrived. The fact that he is the most disparaged personas in the history of the planet doesn’t help either.

Either way, I still am amazed at the volume of information coming from this pro-German website and happy to be able to at least view it. The fact that Germany is on a free-speech lockdown, so we are told, makes me even more curious to know what really happened during WW2 and who Hitler and Germans really were.

Based on the grand lie that is 9/11, we know for sure we didn’t get the correct story. So what was the real one?

A short video I made contrasting and comparing the actions and policies of modern day America with those of Adolf Hitler. Is America now the “Fourth Reich”? Is it run by “evil Nazis”? Or has somebody been lying and fear mongering? This is a slideshow presentation of images with text overlay, including many authentic quotes by Adolf Hitler.  Run time: 11:09

via Video: Adolf Hitler vs The New World Order | Justice for Germans.

No tags for this post.

PsyOps deconstructed audio of the week

Be the 1st to vote.

Tom and John go into psyOps, the disagreement theory, and reveal many nuggets that you won’t hear anywhere else. Topics such as Cass Sunstein’s paper on disrupting and controlling the opposition are discussed in this wide ranging discussion.

One concept that was mentioned: “CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.” www.globalresearch.ca/conspira…

More here: www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html

 CIA Document #1035-960

RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report

1. Our Concern. From the day of President Kennedy’s assassination on, there has been speculation about the responsibility for his murder. Although this was stemmed for a time by the Warren Commission report, (which appeared at the end of September 1964), various writers have now had time to scan the Commission’s published report and documents for new pretexts for questioning, and there has been a new wave of books and articles criticizing the Commission’s findings. In most cases the critics have speculated as to the existence of some kind of conspiracy, and often they have implied that the Commission itself was involved. Presumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren Commission’s report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone, while more than half of those polled thought that the Commission had left some questions unresolved. Doubtless polls abroad would show similar, or possibly more adverse results.

via John Friend’s Blog: The Realist Report with John Friend.

No tags for this post.

Conspiracy slandering

Be the 1st to vote.

Another completely useless article linking foolish, inconsequential concepts with those that question what they are told. The article didn’t bring up one major “conspiracy theory”, but the idea to link critical thinkers with people who theorize over nonsense is the point of the article.

IT MIGHT SEEM LIKE we’re living at a uniquely rich moment for conspiracy theories. Over the last few years, we’ve seen it claimed that Osama bin Laden didn’t really die, that Barack Obama is covering up the true circumstances of his birth, that Kanye West and Kim Kardashian have encoded Illuminati symbolism in their baby’s name, that the National Security Agency has been secretly intercepting Americans’ phone calls and e-mails—oh, wait. That last one’s true.

via Conspiracies: Five things they don’t want you to know – Ideas – The Boston Globe.

No tags for this post.

Blame the Jewsuitsons

Be the 1st to vote.

I am beginning to lean more and more towards the idea that despite how “obvious” it is that group A or group B is “in control”, it’s really an illusion that is being blamed.

If you blame an illusion, those that you send chasing after them will never find a meeting place, never uncover a secret stash of papers, and never find “them” all together at the same time naked worshipping naked at sacrifices.

As long as those that rule over us “get it”, they can just keep referring to a simOrganization and never worry about repercussions.

Why wouldn’t simTerrorists doing simEvents via their simTerrorOrganizations being doing it for an all powerful simOrganization?

Concepts of the mind as so much simpler to manage and organize. They build whole simIndustries of extortion on concepts that you can’t detect with your six senses (nuclear anyone?)

This outburst was simply a planned event to distract and blame an illusion. I call this imaginary group the Jewsuitsons,,,an all encompassing group of evildoers that the real perps can blame.

House Stenographer Outburst Recalls Masonic Conspiracy Theories Past And Present.

No tags for this post.