The Skeleton Key, 9/11, the Millenium Monolith….. | calcified lies

Be the 1st to vote.

@Calcifiedlies is getting some good attention in the chat.fakeologist.com, so I’ll link this post so people can read and discuss his research. I will try and read this information today.

…..and the steaming, fly-infested pile of psyop horseshit that is the alternative media!

Speculative Premise: The Skeleton Key (2005) is a metaphor for the completion of the alchemists’ great work via calculated initiation of the masses through a deceptive symbiosis of revelation of the method and the videodromatic creation of a new synapse in the brain.

via The Skeleton Key, 9/11, the Millenium Monolith….. | calcified lies.

PS: Great thought put into your name, Calcified. Let’s discuss this post as soon as your available on fakeologist radio.

No tags for this post.

6 thoughts on “The Skeleton Key, 9/11, the Millenium Monolith….. | calcified lies

  1. napoleon wilson

    September the eleventh was a movie that we were given to analyse by the opposition. everyone stopped looking after no planes was deployed , then cgi or judy,s wooden wand directed energy weapons finally we settled on media fakery , well as andy dufresne says ” And if you’ve come this far, maybe you’re willing to come a little further”.

    STAR WARS PREHABILLITATED THE XENIALS TO ACCEPT THE LIGHT AND DARK SIDE,(TERRORISM), THE TOWERS WE SEE COLLAPSE ARE MODELS , THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT ALL OF LUCAS,S ALLEGORY AND NAME CHECKS ARE PART OF THE PREHABILLITATION , SO YES MEDIA FAKERY , BUT I COULDNT STOP THERE I HAD TO WORK IT OUT HOPE YOU ALL APPRECIATE THAT I AM A MONSTER,
    NOW WHAT NEXT , WELL I ONLY WANTED TO PROVE TO PEOPLE THAT NOONE DIED IN THE MAKING OF THE MILLENIUM FALL-CON 2001(SATR WARS CLUES) OR 911 AS ITS KNOWN .
    NOT BECAUSE IM A SAINT!!!! BECAUSE THERE IS TOO MANY PEOPLE COMING INTO FAKEOLOGIST WITH THE IDEA THAT ITS POSSIBLE SOMEONE DIED ON THAT DAY ,
    NO CHANCE I,D SAY NEW YORK ON SEP 11 2001 WAS PROBABLY ONE OF THE SAFEST PLACES IN THE WORLD.
    SO TO ANYONE WHO I TALKED WITH OVER THE PAST YEARS ON HOAXBUSTERS AND FAKEOLOGIST THAT I FOUND TO BEE NICE AND HONEST WHO ALSO BELIEVED THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBILTY THAT PEOPLE DIED ON 911 . THIS IS DEDICATED TO YOU ,
    LUCAS GOT THE RIGHTS TO THE TOYS AND YOUR IMAGINATION,
    THE MILLENIUM FALL-CON 2001 (satr wars clues) by me explains who made the models and why and the artistocrats couldn’t resist to pay tribute to the first gullible ape trainer ,smh
    the second trick was cloaking idiotic masonic teachings in a xenial spell, it nearly worked on me , nearly(edited)
    fakeologist.com/forums/topic/t…

    MILLENIUM FALL-CON 2001
    ( the 2001 sep 11 attacks)
    You know as well as i do the outcome of this event affected all the gangs around the world . and each gang has a code so , the bible lot got their prophecy zerubabbel, the masons with the star alignments and the towers falling , even my generation got their prophecy, the millenium fall-con stealing the luke and leia the twins (towers) and only one had a lightsabre ( antenna ) away and subsequently the war on the darkside.(terrorism) never could understand the reasoning behind darth vader and his total evil persona , but after examining american myth and masonic psi fi of the prehabillitation movies the crash course in masonic traditions was completed on that day with the choice of , “your either with us or the terrorist” , but thanks to a keen eye i know see the 33 year trick started by kubricks 2001 space odyssey (gullible apeslooking puzzled) staring at a monolith , and finished in the “real” world with the millenium fall-con, ( millenium hilton hotel)current monolith , was just a trick ,we then saw the empire state building become the main building again striking back then they froze the petrol prices with han solo in , “i know” , the return of the jihad(jedi) and h isis ter was a bad ass , as for judys space weapons lol , clearly just to cover up impossible physics and 2nd rate models .? and whatnot,,ob1 ,,,
    so please help us decipher the smoke and mirrors that the sinnister silver screen offers,

  2. Pingback: Ep111-Blue Moon | Fakeologist.com

  3. Blue MoonBlue Moon

    The analysis of Kubrick and especially The Shining by this guy, Rob Ager, is the best analysis out there- Unfortunately he offers his work on You Tube for only a limited time before you have to purchase it on DVD- I will say it is worth it if you have a few bucks to spare- His analysis of The Shining is far removed from the Weidner/Apollo 11 confession thesis but its a whole lot more cogent and fingers Jack Torrance as an abusive father, much like Stevn King’s own admission about his childhood- This, Ager concludes with considerable evidence, is why King has hated Kubrick’s version all these years- Ager was asked to be in the film Room 237 but declined, and I’m glad he did- To put him in with the Weidners of the world would diminish his own work by association- www.collativelearning.com/rece…

  4. Carole ThomasCarole Thomas

    Good point Ab and Calcified! It’s important to stay on message about the fakery ( and it is amazing how many really good researchers elsewhere seem to miss this point) but it’s still interesting to explore what the agenda of these clowns is (apart from greed and hubris), while at the same time not succumbing to a feeling of helplessness. When I was a child, I really believed that the ( with hindsight rather amaterish) conjurer on the stage at my dad’s company’s annual Christmas show had true magical powers . Now I can perform a few tricks myself, and realize how easily you can impress even very smart people with a smattering of knowledge. How much more can you impress if you have centuries of practice!

  5. CalcifiedLiesCalcifiedLies

    Thanks for the link Ab, appreciate it, I’ll send you a message through the contact/feedback tab.

    I wrote this a couple months ago and just re-read it. It’s funny, I’m not sure if I would write it the same way today or even include the links I did then. Such is the nature of this thing we are all engaged in I suppose. If it had a forward for context outside of my own biases, I would choose Hoi Polloi’s post:

    To me — and I will try to stay grounded and on topic here as we float into the outer space of speculative writings — the mysticism about Kubrick can get a little old for me, particularly when it comes to trying to guess what he was thinking by ‘reading into’ things he created and said. It’s exciting to assume Kubrick understood everything we know now, but it also borders a bit on underdog hero worship and retroactive forgiveness of a crony who profited off of his cozy relationship with the military and fucking with people’s minds. These are just my thoughts, feel free to disagree. And it isn’t to say all the guesses must inherently be wrong. It could be all of it, or a lot of it, is correct. We have precious little to ‘go on’ without being part of Kubrick’s inner circle of government and post-post-modernist friends, but we all live around human beings and all of us can learn about the human psyche from ourselves, the people around us and the fucking loony beliefs every single person on the planet seems to hold just to stay relatively safe in this world. No offense to rationalism or cynicism.

    Anyway, I just skimmed through it and my personal opinion is that some of it could be bang on (the clear parallel between the monolith and the movie screen, and how we might be meant to interpret it on various levels of consciousness) and some of it is very open to interpretation (whether or not the paranoid concepts of ‘the elite’ or ‘the pawns’ are represented when and how he says they are) but there isn’t much ‘in between’ for me. For the most part, it is a useful document. I think what Fakeologist user calcifiedlies wrote recently about how 2001 fits in a big picture scenario is just as plausible, though. And as they remind us at the end of the article, they could be completely wrong too.

    These are very speculative writings, among Dave McGowan’s series. And even if that speculation is capable of reaching a deeper and more important truth because of its powerful leaps to assumed hidden knowledge, we must focus the forum here on the clearest most egregious examples of fakery. On the other hand, I guess I don’t see too much harm in at least honoring the work done in long-distance-analyzing the psychology of the hoaxers. If these speculations and musings help people grow accustomed to the facts of fakery, that’s great! I especially share concern about the technocracy and what their insanity may bring them to unleash on the human population.

    I guess my only worry, if you can call it that, is that this drama may lead people far off into the realm of imagination and emotional reaction and they could lose sight of the physical sciences, the value in humane scientific studies, and/or the importance of each other and our personal responsibility to ourselves when we are combating the lies ‘out there’. The deception starts at home, with our own beliefs. Those types of articles tend to build up beliefs and do not give us much time to exercise non-belief or skepticism.

    cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?…

    I know the term “false flag” is cringeworthy and a tool of obfuscation, I included the Bisden article as a way to appeal to a less sophisticated, “fakery averse” reader of conspiracy research. The Weidner-Kubrick thread is one of the most popular and entry level areas of research so I figure it was a way to draw that audience into the case being presented. This is also why I preface a sentence with “I have no doubt that innocent people died because of the 9/11 psychic ritual”, even though I might not necessarily believe that.

    I’m interested in the big-picture, but would be nowhere without the groundwork of detail-oriented researchers, so if you take anything away from this comment just know that my intention is not to try and change the Cluesforum or Fakeologist approach to deconstructing propaganda.

    1. ab Post author

      I just read Hoi’s comment on clues that you linked. I figure with some of the more brilliant minds that populate both forums, we can get a better handle on who’s leading this parade and where they’re going (hopefully not over a cliff). I don’t like to give them too much credit for being visionaries. I think they’re just crafty and devious, but I doubt they can see into the future or make the future perfectly. All they can do is keep nudging us one way or the other, while extracting great gains and enriching themselves while defrauding the masses.

Leave a Reply