Daily Archives: August 10, 2014

Fukushima image analysis

Be the 1st to vote.

Simon asks Cimino to explain some Fuk-u Shima images.

I have to laugh. This is a hysterically hilarious development.

I just listened to Dennis Cimino (Jim Fetzer’s longtime collaborator) on the latest John Friend radio show. According to Cimino, humanity can start waving goodbye to life on Earth because, within a few years or so, we are all going to perish – due to the radiation released by the dreadful / universally-lethal Fuck-U-Shima “event”. No kidding.

via View topic – FUKUSHIMA nuke/tsunami scare 11-03-11 • Cluesforum.info.

BEFORE:
Image

AFTER:
Image

QUESTION N°1: Mr. Cimino, please focus your eyes and mind on that top section marked “Y” in the above two images. Note that, in the “BEFORE” image, the “Y” section is darker than the rest of the ‘building’. Now, in the “AFTER” image, exactly that darker section appears to have been blown off – in a ‘clean / horizontal’ fashion. Can you give us a rational / no-nonsense explanation for this?

Yes Simon the photo imagery does indicate many anomalies that indicate a fabricated event. This story has been the Three Mile Island incident of our time. None of it makes sense, including the endless tsunamis of fear that emanate from this apparently uninhabitable area surrounding the plant. Not only is there no on-the-ground evidence that high radiation exists where it’s supposed to be, but this event has done nothing to convince me that nuclear radiation, or nuclear anything, exists at all.

Since we can’t see, hear, taste, touch, or smell nuclear radiation, we are asked to rely on a clicking gadget called a Geiger counter to tell us about the magic in the air. What it really responds to is anyone’s guess. Other than this instrument, we are asked to rely on experts in white coats who are paid vast amounts of money for their expertise (or complicity) on what is happening.

Please read the above cluesforum link and tell me if this event convinces you of the existence of nuclear radiation or of the existence of media fakery.