Psyoptishea feud

Be the 1st to vote.

This message is for @Psyopticon and @PShea.

Here’s the short version if you don’t want to read further:

STOP with the feud or you’ll both be banned from Fakeologist.com…

Now for the long version:

Fakeologist.com… isn’t just a place to discuss fakery. It’s become a community. That’s not by design, but by happenstance. I enjoy all the entities for the most part that have come by to chat, textually or verbally. I don’t agree with everyone about everything, but I allow for enough variance to not be totally discriminating and then eliminating.

Sometimes we have people who come by here honestly, and sometimes dishonestly. I don’t have time to filter everyone out as quickly as I’d like, but I make an effort to keep things somewhat focused. Sometimes the action can get away from me.

Adding the audiochats has created an extra, challenging dimension. The sheer volume of minutes can be daunting to edit, let alone listen to. The onus is on all the preapproved participants to act with respect towards each other and the audience.

The latest dustup between @psyopticon and @pshea has now escalated into a full distraction. It has caused an general unease that is not welcome here. Since I value the majority of the members here, I request the following:

@Pshea – no more discussion on the name fraud. We get it. Just like I don’t want to hear about the fake jumpers of 9/11 any more, I don’t need more discussion on this obtuse topic that does not resonate. No more musing more than once about shills among us. Most understand the concept of infiltration of groups by cointelpro. As a collective, shills will eventually reveal themselves and be shunned (and banned). I don’t mind your philosophical tones, but your often baseless musings of shillery are destructive in a passive way.

@Psyopticon – no more lashing out in a sneering, condescending tone. Your cluster-bomb approach to other fakeologist members is destructive and unwelcome. Your previous demeanor of careful research was most welcome before the conflict occurred. Please resume this if you wish to remain. I agree that more focus should be put on researching media fakery, and less emphasis on more esoteric topics. Since this site implies my own personal bias towards 9/11 and media fakery, I’d prefer if topics related to them were emphasized.

We now resume our regular fakeologist programming.

9 thoughts on “Psyoptishea feud

  1. khammadkhammad

    Guide to the Psyopticon Shillery Event

    1) Audiochat Aug 12-13/2014 ½
    8/12/14 This is the original audio where Psyopticon’s voice allegedly changes
    2.28.40 “Say guys, hh hi there Unreal and Rollo and uh Ab, how’s things? I uh era ok , I’m looking at yer sss excuse me for my ignorance Unreal, Im looking at you’re um your flag >>>>>>>>>> you know your national flag on your um name you’re your name >>>>>>>>>> what is that, like blue white red, blue white rr orange”
    (Between the arrows is where the alleged voice morphing takes place)
    fakeologist.com…

    2) Audiochat Aug16-17/2014 – ep 122 Afterparty
    8/17/14 This is the audio where Peter Shea confronts Psyopticon for his voice morphing
    Starts at 3:51:25
    fakeologist.com…

    3) Examining Shill Tactics

    8/20/14 This is the video Khammad did highlighting the voice morphing
    youtu.be/EbB3tacEOl0…

  2. Blue MoonBlue Moon

    My real name has magical powers- I’m keeping it- And I’m not kidding- Ever since grade school my name in relation to the person it’s attached to has affected teachers, classmates, their parents, girl friends, employers… I’m not going anywhere near a name version of that numbers guy’s shtick, but names can have an effect on behavior- I’m sure the ancients had whole systems based on names- Moving on….

  3. FauxCapitalist

    I heard this episode before the post was removed and have now heard the audio in question, and I agree with PShea that Psyopticon’s voice was morphed. It’s not some “frog in the throat,” as the voice seamlessly changes.

    And for Psyopticon to claim that he doesn’t even know what voice morphing technology is isn’t believable when he earlier claimed that he’s a computer guy who could talk about computer algorithms, in making the point that not everything is relevant for discussion regarding Fakeology.

    Good job, Pshea, in sticking to your assertions despite Psyopticon’s denials and attacks against you, which even by themselves, were suspicious., but in combination with listening to the audio, it suggests to me a motive beyond just wanting to change a voice to make it sound better for the show.

    And this whole incident highlights a key issue that it’s easy to speculate about fakery about those events and people we don’t have associations with. Listen to the audio, Ab. If you think most things are faked, I don’t see how you could conclude that Pshea isn’t right about Psyopticon’s voice being morphed.

    1. ab Post author

      The post wasn’t removed: it was moved. As I’ve described, I don’t think the voice was purposely changed. The only thing I can say for sure is that @psyopticon was testy and nasty with some of the people here and they got offended. For that he appears contrite and said he will move on. I still enjoy his commentary here and on cluesforum.info…. The net effect seems to have been total silence. We will see how things fall out. Amazing is the human dynamic.

  4. Gwynned

    As I heard most of the conversation, please allow me to weigh in for what it’s worth. It seems to me that Peter is/was trying to move the conversation to the next level by asking provocative questions. If I might turn your comment on its head Ab, 9-11 was faked. We get it. Let’s move on. I found myself here because I discovered the fakery some time ago which discovery has caused a bit of a rift between me and nearly the rest of humanity, unless I can carefully avoid questions about world events and/or keep my mouth shut when people talk about the ‘news.’

    But we could talk forever about the fakery, analyze each photoshopped image, etc., but of what value is it in the long run. Yes, for the shows with guests with a particular agenda, it would make sense to limit the conversation, but in the after chats, I was hoping to find others who are interested in EXPLAINING this phenomenon. Now that we have identified the dots, what does the picture look like when we connect them? It is as though we are spending lots of time describing a tool and no time trying to figure out how it works. Why do they consistently use certain colors in the fakery? Where is it leading? Why is it so funny? WHO is really behind it and what is their agenda. What can we learn about the perpetrators of these hoaxes by studying their work?

    I don’t think these are metaphysical kinds of new age questions. These are practical ones. If, as many here seem to suspect, the perps are merciless bad guys, perhaps the best course of action as a human on this planet is to start building an underground shelter and storing food. If they are, as Peter has suggested, good guys using unconventional means to educate and enlighten the public and a revealation is just around the corner, perhaps we can not worry, be happy, relax and enjoy the show together.

  5. PeterSheaPeterShea

    and the fake jumpers on 9/11 weren’t real. the name fraud fucking is, whether it resonates with you or not. it is what enslaves us all.
    I don’t believe I have any apologies to make. I spotted a mole and I whacked it.
    but it is your platform, and I do respect that.

    i’ll quite down and allow all to move on.

Leave a Reply