ep144-Rae West

Be the 1st to vote.

Who? Rae West of big-lies.org

When? Sunday, April 26, 2015 4:11pm EDT

Download

 

No tags for this post.

20 thoughts on “ep144-Rae West

  1. ab Post author

    From a user who doesn’t wish to log in:

    Review of Fakeologist ep144-Rae-West 2:17

    As usual, in Ab’s preamble about 9/11 and it’s repercussions he mentions nothing about the millions of
    people who have lost their lives as a result of these psychological operations (false-flags). To this day
    these false events are being used to justify “the war on terrorism” and if one includes the accumulated
    trickery we know of since the dawn of humankind, the death toll has surely surpassed a billion by now. Ab
    chooses to downplay all this for some reason, not realizing he will soon have this same target on him if
    not already. Speak out for all Ab, because when they’re gone there will be no one to speak out for us.

    Rae had some interesting takes on things…
    (biglies.org, nukelies..)

    Are we too stifled by fear? Afraid of our thoughts? Afraid our words will be used as weapons against us? Or
    worse …

    I don’t really like Southpark but when I did watch there was an interesting episode about Alen, an alien
    monitoring everyone from some remote ship then taking them out with the push of a button based on their
    behavior.

    … Could such technologies already be effecting our behavior? Psychologically as well as literally,
    through certain frequencies?

    To our credit we sorts (Fakeologists, etc.) do perceive the psychological conditioning going on, as well as
    the outright legislation attempting to keep us all unquestioning and in our place.

    With ep144-Rae-West we have Ab at his usual doubting best…possibly thinking Rae some kind of computer
    program designed to entrap him in a kind of anti-semitic void? Unsure what to do Ab froze on the tracks,
    for a time, while the more driven Rae in his well engineered locomotive proceeded onward at near full
    steam. Ab suddenly realizing the danger he was in, turned the whole interview into a debate, in effect
    sabotaging the whole concept of an interview. The guest hardly slowing down, just missed Ab enroute to his
    next destination…

    For a comparison of podcasts, as a measurement if you will, Red Ice Radio’s Enrich seems to handle such
    diversity well… (hour 1 free and informative on it’s own). Also, whatreallyhappened.com‘s show is one of
    my favorites (except for the commercials) where one can at least get a sense of what CNN is lying to
    everyone about, or ommiting. Ab has his own appreciated style though, and in time, if not proven to be too
    subversive I’m sure he will improve.

    If I was on this show I probably wouldn’t know what to say, with the rather tricky topic Rae postulated. If
    I was the host I’d probably say, at the least, “interesting”, during excess pauses. It was a dangerous
    topic … and we need to understand exactly why that is. The question is, did Rae say something wrong? How
    much truth is in what he said? A topic that needs to be thoroughly discussed in my opinion. Misconceptions
    worked out, realizations brought forward in our dire need for a perception of all things and all peoples
    amongst us.

    Are we afraid to think? Afraid to say? Or worse don’t know what to think or say. Anyway, Rae West, and
    James Fetzer, deserve more respect. If the Fake’ clan think Fetzer such a ‘shill’, or whatever their
    current catch word is, please do a show going into details about this. Because at this point it is not
    clear to me, as I consider his shows thorough and genuine. Maybe differing in details but as I’ve stated
    before, the finer details of these initial hoaxes is not as important as what is happening because of them,
    and who’s behind them.

    Bring Rae back and let him finish talking!

    Do an interview (proper) with James Fetzer.

    On Ab’s reaction to Rae’s announcements:

    What does it matter what level, what organization is at? If an organization is knowingly working for chaos
    they’re knowingly working for chaos! What happened to accountability? I have withdrew from all
    organizations that are any part of these wider problems, as much as possible, and so should all good people
    among any of these fascades. For example, the honorable Gilad Atzmon.

    I think Rae rightfully has Cluesform on his ‘something’s missing’ list, and as Ab even acknowledged, so
    might Fakeologist be, and after this show even more so…than Cluesform.

    …and finally Ab, what was your comment about Toronto being the hub of intelligence or something? Really?
    Please explain that … Dry humor is fine (though I did not perceive that) but literal arrogance would be a
    problem.

    There are two spirits in the world today, competition: groveling for deliverence from the hell fires laping
    at everyone’s backside, or cooperation: calmly accessing the situation and wisely seeking unity.

    Maybe you should pre-record your shows. That way everyone can say what ever the *** they’d like and you can
    just edit what you’d like out or cut what you are afraid to let loose. Then let all involved approve before
    releasing (or maybe not, because you’d probably cut all the good stuff out). Also, research your guests
    before-hand! That way you can kind of have an idea of how you will respond to any differences you may have
    without coming off as a reactionary. Also, if you have a direction for an interview, example: Nukes are
    Fake, stick to it, albeit gracefully. In a graceful manner, probably staying neutral to things going off-
    topic, unless in agreeance with the off topic topic. Not, snidely disagreeing with an off-topic you were
    ill prepared to discuss or hear. Also you might want to discuss and agree to the topic or topics with the
    guest or guests before hand or before you push record.

    Just a thought. Thanks for the stimuli regardless Ab, it is appreciated.

    Best wishes,

    Sacred Lost.

    PS: If you post this. Please let me know when and where it will be. Your site is not clear enough to me and
    I don’t have the discipline to understand what all is there and where.

    Also, please let me know if you are getting these. Just one word like “Thanks” in response is fine. Or
    “Please do not email us again” [or the e-address I should send]. Otherwise I will assume my email is either
    not getting through or not wanted and this will be my last email. Remember I am not online (except mostly
    to upload and download) so there is not much use in me creating and dealing with a Fakeologist account.
    Although that is a possibility if and when I feel it’s relevancy.

    Also, after a few experiences with sites unfairly censoring me, I am reluctant to join a site, especially a
    site I find myself critical of as is currently my situation with Fakeologist.com and it’s contributors. Not
    that I would have a problem with debate, quite the contrary, I believe debate is crucial, but this belief
    in allowing debate must be reciprocal by site monitors and allowed uncensored. Considering certain rules
    prohibiting abuse are maintained (e.g., no language that may be considered offensive, personal attacks,
    name-calling, put-downs, prejudices, slurs, etc.).

    I have actually recently started a group where I hope to invite such discourse: Save The U.S.A.
    soundcloud.com/groups/save-the…

    A different audio style approach to the message board concept. Where the only prerequisite is joining
    Soundcloud.com and following the group rules I’ve posted in the groups description.

    Sacred Lost

  2. xileffilex

    He’s right, the UK satirical magazine Private Eyeis disinformation [from a very high level]
    Castro another actor, playing his part in the game.
    Good show.

  3. nimblehorsenimblehorse

    Hello Tim.

    Thanks for getting Ray on again…I have gained substantially from big-lies, cluesforum & fakeologist over the years.

    This problem, ‘The Jewish question’ has been on my mind for the past 3 years & if you recall I talked with you on an earlier broadcast & I mentioned your reluctance to comment on the elephant in the room. I want to say you were very generous to Ray, allowing him to run away with the Jewish cabal topic rather than your interest of the Nuke issue. So to be honest, I dont see you as a sophisticated troll or anything other than a truth seeker, like myself.
    & to be fair to cluesforum, i had noticed between the lines of Simon’s writings, & him digging up mugshots of various Jewish fraudsters etc…but the site policy does seem to sidestep the Jewish issue.

    I can understand why that is, The ‘Jew’ word is like a tar baby, handling the subject is problematic.

    “all generalizations are false, including this one !” Mark Twain

    The thing is..I have some missing pieces to the puzzle of this controversial subject. Information that very few are aware of at the moment, which I wish to share with you.

    So after 3 years of intense study of Judaism/Talmud, on the one hand & Biblical Scripture/Historicity on the other, I feel I am in a position to shed some light on this matter.

    I want to be as brief as possible in this post, I am sure you understand the enormity of the subject and i can only touch on certain points.
    so if I can start with the Bible, The Jews claim some sort of ancient connection with the biblical Hebrews/Israelite’s & they have the various props such as the scrolls & Torah (the 1st 5 books of the bible) and the 9 branched candle holder. you know it as orthodox Judaism.

    However

    The Jews admit that they are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites in their writings. Under the heading of “A brief History of the Terms for Jew” in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:
    “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

    If we discount the 95% of modern Jury, the Ashkenazim, the Turco/Mongol/Hittite Khazar’s. as we all agree their adoption of the Babylonian Talmud circa 800AD having little or no genetic inheritance with the biblical Israelite’s.
    The other 5% being the Shephardim (so called Spanish Jew) also has next to zero Israelite genetics.
    This percentage is in fact the older branch of Judaism & they promote the Torah over the Talmud, and are generally marginalized by the Talmudic 95%

    So the whole religious front to Judaism is a fraud. The Rabbis know this of course, its a ‘Professional Liars Club’
    Its a 2125 year obfuscation exercise to defraud & depose the ‘Real’ Hebrew/Israelite’s.

    In a nutshell then, around 150BC the last true Israelite King, John Harcainus annexed the southern Canaanite land of Idomea. These Edomites (Babylonian Canaanites) were the traditional enemy of the true biblical Hebrews…so it wasn’t long before john harcainus & his son were assassinated & the Edomite King Herod with the help of the Romans usurped the Israelite throne…had the entire Sanhedrin swapped out with his own cronies and the scene was set for Jesus Christ to make an appearance…this is the Bible story of when all the infants up to 2 year’s old in the territory of Judea were to be destroyed…never before in biblical scripture had any Israelite King ever called for the mass execution of Israelite children…King Herod was an Edomite/canaanite & feared the coming of the ‘true king of Israel’ so had the children murdered, hoping one of them would be the infant Israelite messiah.
    This is the start of Judaism.125BC
    The Mosaic temple at Jerusalem was in the hands of the historic enemy of Israel & the process of corrupting the ‘Torah’ began.

    The eminent Rabi Louis Finkelstein, the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (often referred to as ‘The Vatican of Judaism’) in the Foreword to his First Edition of his classic The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, on page XXI states:

    “… Judaism… Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name… the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered…
    From Palestine to Babylonia, from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered …
    … demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement…”

    Basically, the Talmud is a running commentary on the Torah.
    The Talmud wasn’t written down until 800AD and before that it was called ‘The Traditions of the Elders’
    It takes every law & commandment in the Mosaic Law & turns it on its head.

    Virtually every page of the four gospels Jesus is condemning the Jews.

    “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut off the kingdom of heaven from people; for you do not enter in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in.”Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense you make long prayers; therefore you will receive greater condemnation.…”Matthew 23:13

    Jesus was not a Jew, not by religion or by ethnicity. he was a racially exclusive Judahite…of the House of Judah…Teaching Mosaic Law & covenant theology not an Edomite Jew (Judean)practicing Babylonian Talmudism.

    you see…this word ‘Jew’ has been inserted into the bible & covers three bases.

    1. Judean = of the nation state Judea (Judah+Idumea)(circa 150BC)
    2. Judah= the man & progenitor of the tribe of Judah.
    3. Judahite= a member of the racially exclusive tribe of Judah.

    No Judahite called himself a Jew. No Israelite called himself a Jew.
    Nowhere in Biblical scripture, in the original Hebrew & Greek is the word Jew used. It is always one of the three, Judah, Judahite or Judean(a citizen of the later polyglot state of Judea).

    And Remember, the tribe of Judah was only one of the 12 covenant tribes….

    Jesus himself says;

    ” am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 15:24

    and jesus’s brother James, the first verse of his gospel;

    “James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,
    To the twelve tribes scattered among the nations: Greetings.”

    The biblical scripture was written by, for & about the Israelites, whom their creator God Yahweh (literally “I Am That I Am”) has had multiple exclusive covenants/contractual arrangements with the 12 tribes, to keep his Law & them failing miserably hence the need for an Messiah.
    The Israelites are Creator god Yahweh’s ‘special project’ his chosen people,
    The Racial element to the Biblical narrative cannot be denied , as they are commanded to be an holy people, an separate people. the word ‘holy’ means set apart/set aside.
    Page after page of scripture is their god commanding them to not marry outside their race.
    The racial aspect to the original scriptural narrative has been completely eclipsed.

    The word Catholic actually means ‘Universal’ & Catholicism is just another version of Talmudic Judaism.
    The word ‘Gentile’ is another translational error inserted into biblical scripture. ‘Gentile’ is a Latin word (that has no place in scripture) that means, kinsman/countryman. it sits in place of the original Greek, ‘Ethnos’ = Race/Nation & in turn from the Hebrew Goyim = Nation(any nation, even the Israelite nation).
    Gentile does not mean ‘Non Jew’ it’s that simple.

    There is an ongoing obfuscation to the true biblical message by the devils own children, the Talmudists.

    So these lost sheep…the word ‘lost’ in the original Hebrew lexicon, is ‘to put away in shame’ as a wife is divorced & put away.
    & it refers to when the northern 10 tribes broke away from the southern tribes of Judah & Benjamin.
    This is circa 745 BC the northern tribes broke Yahweh’s Laws & were worshiping other gods, ie: golden calf’s. So Yahweh divorced them & as punishment, had them captured by the Assyrians and relocated at the foot of the Caucasus mountains between the Black Sea & the Caspian Sea, some 2 million persons…intended as a pool of slave labor for the powerful Assyrian nation…
    They escaped through a mountain pass into southern Europe & these escaping Israelites enter popular history as the bronze age Celts…650 BC.

    So the Ancient Biblical Israelites are the genetic progenitors of modern day Anglo Saxon/Germanic/Celtic Caucasian & kindred peoples.

    There were three waves of Israelite migrations into western Europe, starting around 1500 BC but I am just going to keep it as simple as i can.

    The bible prophecised that Israel would lose her identity, until the end times & she would start remembering one israelite at a time.

    The descendants of the real tribe of Judah Today are predominantly German… though the Scots & Irish share in the genetic heritage.
    The genocide of the Germans in WW2 & the present day Holohoax punishment demonstrates the enmity between the devils children, Talmudic Jews & True Israel, the original nation states of Europe.

    Jesus says to the scribes & pharisee’s

    “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
    John 8:44

    & finally to wrap up, the last book of the Holy Bible, the book of Revelations 2:9

    “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews[sic Judah], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

    Im following the Christian Identity point of view, simply scriptural word study & biblical historicity.

    The Jewish quotes came from these two sites:

    www.iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashk…

    www.sweetliberty.org/perspecti…

    & Jesus Quotes from the King James version.

    Thanks.

    “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32

    Never a truer word spoken

    1. ab Post author

      I’m sticking to my theory that the elephant has been placed in the room deliberately, and protections put in place not to talk about it. Your controllers would not be so stupid as to put themselves in the room in case enough people caught on and wanted the elephant removed.

      1. Carole ThomasCarole Thomas

        To inject a serious note into the discussion;-)
        A story is told of a Jewish man who was riding on the subway reading an Arab newspaper. A friend of his, riding in the same subway car, noticed this bizarre phenomenon. Very upset, he approached the newspaper reader. “Moshe, have you lost your mind? Why are you reading an Arab newspaper?” Moshe replied, “I used to read the Jewish newspaper, but what did I find? Jews being persecuted, Israel being attacked, Jews disappearing through assimilation and intermarriage, Jews living in poverty. So I switched over to the Arab newspaper. Now what do I find? Jews own all the banks, Jews control the media, Jews are all rich and powerful, Jews rule the world. The news here is so much better!”

          1. Blue MoonBlue Moon

            There is no historical Jesus and there is no fictional character so named until the ninth century CE- Prior to Charlemagne and the configuration of the Holy Roman Empire, there is only the term Chrestus, which means goodness, essentially, and does not refer to an individual- There is no formal naming of Jesus Christ in any text reliably dated before the ninth century- The nomina sacra, or sacred name, found in any text reliably dated prior to the ninth century expresses an individual named IS or JS- This is not Jesus Christ and does not stand for that name- It is closer to the Koran’s Isa, the character identified as Jesus in the Muslim reckoning, but the Koran is no more “reportage” or history than the Old or New Testament is- The IS or JS is likely derived from the Egyptian goddess Isis, which entered into the highest Roman circles through Cleopatra VII and her relationships with Caesar and Marc Antony-
            The syncretism of Ptolemaic Egyptian religion and Greco/Roman religion through Isis and Cleopatra is the grounding upon which the Imperial/Augustan sanctioned watered down, inclusive pseudo-Judaism that Saul/Paul/Faul espoused was erected upon- This rear guard action by the Romans through the Herodian puppet court brought into play this religious psy-op against the Messianic Jewish movement that was bedeviling Rome in the first century CE-
            I part ways here with Joseph Atwill who claims the gospels were already in circulation in the time of the late first century Flavian emperors- He claims they were used as a replacement text for the Jewish holy texts and are satires based on Josephus “secular” histories- I agree there was psychological warfare afoot, with Saul, a family member of the Herodian court, in the lead in disseminating the fake evangel of a pacifist redeemer rather than a warrior “messiah”- But a character named Jesus Christ exists only in back dated copies of “lost” originals- Therefore, too, the church doctors like Origen and Eusebius and Tertullian etc. would also have to be imaginary characters to backfill the non existent “history” of the Church prior to Charlemagne- (They are likely variations on already existing commentaries about something or things other than the non-existent Christianity- Manichaeism, for example, a religious philosophic movement that did indeed exist throughout the eastern territories for several centuries CE)
            Additions to the traditions of the non-existent Christian church include baptism and resurrection, which found their way into the mainstream Roman rituals through emperor Hadrian in the second century CE and his cult of Antinous, a drowned in the Nile sacrificed concubine who was resurrected in statuary form and his likeness disseminated across the empire, his statues acting as sort of spiritual cell towers-
            Constantine in the fourth century CE included baptism in his rites as an initiatory phase in recruiting Gothic allies to displace the native population in the Italian peninsula in an attempt to control the western empire from Constantinople-
            This is the “relatively” short course whereby we get to Charlemagne and his desire to unite his territories under a pan European religion that stitches together (syncretizes) pre-existing rites and rituals as a hedge against the encroachments of the Byzantine empire and the Muslim presence- The iconoclast rebellions in the eighth century CE are one of the galvanizing events that accelerate the process of the “Catholic” church coming into being in some recognizable form in the ninth century CE-
            Here is a jumping off point for where I’m headed with the above:
            sites.google.com/site/originso…

  4. Blue MoonBlue Moon

    I must admit this dust up over who is better at finding Jews in the woodpile is rather strange- To rigorously insist on one’s Jew spotting bona fides will read very badly in many circles that would otherwise be open to examining media fakery- As a lifelong Californian, forgive me for being ignorant about the Jewish people, their European history, and how they, apparently, produce such an inordinate amount of skullduggery that they must be identified not as individuals with the occasional deviant (as all cultures produce) but as a race of inveterate schemers- This seems to be more of a European phenomenon but akin to the doctrinaire racism I experienced growing up that was pointed against black people- On one level I get the fear of the Jews stuff because to this day, black men can put me on red alert for no other reason than the white man’s culture marinated me in that fear- Childhood trauma is hard to shake- Even so, the Jew fetish I encounter on various boards always, without exception, diminishes the research- It is like using terms such as “Illuminati” or “Jesuits” or “Reptilians”- One would have to thoroughly convince me there is a worldwide Jewish conspiracy to buy in to this, but after thirty plus years of research, the only conclusion I can draw is that the “Jews” in the context of this kind of research are a cudgel, generally used by provocateurs, to taint the research with the implication of anti-Semitism- And for most people, that’s invalidates all the research- That may not be fair, but people are like that- Where they might be open to no planes, CGI false realities and the like, once the merest taint of racial exclusion rears its head, they dismiss it all as an agenda driven conspiracy- And ain’t that ironic?

    1. ab Post author

      My main problem with blaming the Jews is the same as blaming the Muslims. It’s a fishnet that traps a majority of a population that has no idea what’s going on, let alone sign up for skullduggery. They’re easy targets for opposite reasons: one tries to get ahead and avoid trouble by getting on top, and the other is just trying to learn the ropes and unify and get off the bottom. Jesuits, intelligence and Freemason organizations are on the other hand a voluntary subscription action that one is not born into, and one that you can (try to) leave if you stumble into them with eyes wide shut. The deceivers are always going to disguise themselves. It should be obvious that an organization that relies on secrecy and deception and impersonation should be suspect #1. Blaming and impersonating religious organizations (and I don’t consider Jesuitism a religion) is the best way to set people upon each other and not question the impersonator. After all, there is no greater belief system.

      1. babette

        Apropos “secrecy and deception” Mossad’s motto is “By way of DECEPTION thou shalt do war.”

        Muslims don’t own Hollywood/mainstream media. Jews own it. Don’t believe me; just go check the names. Their REAL names, that is.

        You might try researching the “belief system” of Talmudic Jews for starters.

        Since Jews own Hollywood/mainstream media and it is agreed 9/11 was a Hollywood/mainstream media extravaganza how can anyone deny the power they have to change the world? They are Virtuosi of the Hoax. Their hollow-hoax is one of the most enduring and profitable of all time!

        Best Regards,
        b

  5. Henkus

    Just wanted to say how much I like these podcasts and how they bring me to new ideas and research.
    I also think Hoi Polloi did a great job of ‘defending’ cluesforum and trying to bring all people closer to eachother.
    And I will surely be reading more from/about Rea West, very interesting .
    The youtube video posted surely got my attention!

  6. Hoi PolloiHoi Polloi

    It’s with a hyphen, I think. “big-lies” rather than one word.

    On that site, he seems to be obsessed with Jews.

    He claims CluesForum “cannot be serious” :

    Cluesforum.info is a 9/11 research site with some very good information, but which never explored the Jewish angle to this fraud. It takes a lot of care to project a serious fact-checking and troll-excluding image. Unfortunately, it’s not possible that it can be entirely serious. It may well be a refined troll site. Pity.

    www.big-lies.org/JOFF/

    Just because we accuse the Jewish gang as well as other gangs, we are accused of “not being serious” and that our “troll-excluding” is just an “image” we “project”.

    I am not sure how more insulting he could be unless he were to accuse us of being just a “Jewish front”. Oh, wait, we have already been accused of that, along with being a “Jesuit front”, “Masonic”, “CIA” and a number of other ridiculous ideas.

    So people should dismiss our information because we are being accused of being a hate-group like Zionist Jews?

    Yawn.

      1. Hoi PolloiHoi Polloi

        Fine, I will for now. I know it’s off topic to complain about the source. But you haven’t invalidated my point.

        And I am sure it could be a fine show, but I am just sick of people using our information and then saying there must be something wrong with us because the information is good. Allow me to be sensitive to this kind of unnecessary smear against us, when big-lies and cluesforum could be allies instead.

      2. Tom DalpraTom Dalpra

        Hey, babe, ( you don’t mind ‘babe’, do you? ) what have you got against Hoi? You made some other comment somewhere else. That was a perfectly appropriate post on this thread.

        Your mini, concerted attack on Hoi appears out of place.
        What’s your problem ?

    1. simonshacksimonshack

      Quoting Rae West :
      Cluesforum.info… is a 9/11 research site with some very good information, but which never explored the Jewish angle to this fraud.”

      Well, that simply isn’t true – and Rae should know better than that. For instance, in this old post cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?… titled “NUKE HOAX – some historical background” I specifically point out that, out of the 10 international top scientists ‘recruited’ to sell the nuke hoax , as many as 8 (1/2) were …

      8 OF THEM ARE JEWISH
      Eight of them are Jewish – but one of the two non-Jews (Enrico Fermi) had a Jewish wife and fled to the USA because of that. This Jewish website actually boasts of this fact: www.bje.org.au/learning/people… … mbomb.html

      You’d have to be blind or living under a rock not to notice the glaringly obvious predominance of jewish characters (from the media, TV & film industry all the way to the banking ‘system’) in this mad world of ours infested with fakery and deception.

      As for my 9/11 research, I have – over the years – listed / researched / exposed countless jewish clowns directly involved in one way or another in this other, massive ‘terror’ hoax sold to the public – too many to mention, in fact. Now, I may not always / constantly point out that this or that clown is jewish – but this is just out of respect of my readers’ intelligence: wouldn’t it be quite silly of me if, whenever mentioning – for instance – a Steven Rosenbaum or a Kenneth Feinberg or a Larry Silverstein, I also kept annotating that : “Oh, and by the way, folks – do you know that the guy is jewish?”

      For Rae West to say that “it’s not possible for [Cluesforum] to be entirely serious” is frankly a bit silly of him – especially considering the (spurious) reasons he advances for such a claim.

      Simon Shack

    2. rerevisionist

      [I only just found this, because it used my video & I was looking to see how far Youtube has disabled them]
      I looked at my big-lies.org/joff/ site, and found your extract was correct. I’ve withdrawn that item from joff and replaced it in big-lies.org/jadar/ in the 5 star (popular) section. Apologies for that; as far as I remember there were numerous trolls, and I should have read more]
      RW

Leave a Reply