Tracking planes and the Cape as a set

Be the 1st to vote.

Before fakeology, I always wondered why satellites weren’t being used to track planes in the air. Now I am sure the reason is because satellites do not exist.

So what is this latest agreement about? Perhaps more western money to create digital ground based systems around the lesser travelled parts of the world. They must be expensive, especially since they woild have to be in inaccessible areas around the world or even floating in the vast oceans.

Figuring out how satellites are simulated is yet another puzzle that’s hard to figure out with the clues the media gives us.

A deal has been struck on using satellites to track planes, motivated by the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 last year, BBC News reports.

Mark discusses the satellite fraud around the 50 min mark in this audio.

Speaking of simulations, at the 12 min mark they discuss how Cape Canaveral is really just a giant movie set. The neighbouring town Titusville doesn’t do that well, indicating that few people other than tour guides worked the set. I don’t believe they use the Cape now that NASA is out of the launch business, but maybe it was never busy even back in the shuttle days.

No tags for this post.

2 thoughts on “Tracking planes and the Cape as a set

  1. ZalianZalian

    Looking forward to Marks Art Bell show in december, he is gonna get so incredibly wrecked.

    Eric or Jeran or even morgile, does at least not explain everything with game design theory, which any smart person can easily tear apart.
    No matter how much of an agent Stanton friedman is he will easily see this (provided ofcourse Mark is not also a agent, which is very possible).

    Actually understanding game design myself, i can see what hes trying to do, but its also very easy to see he is steering it towards religion, and explains the plotholes with “pff thats easy” as Eric puts it.

    Then again that was presuming that Mark is for real, we all know without a doubt that both Art and Stanton Friedman is not.

    Looking forward to it either way.

    Concering the Satelites and Nasa stuff, there is some nuggets in this show (possibly used to build credibility for his more “out there” theories).

    -Zal

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.