Audiochat-Ab, Unreal 

Be the 1st to vote.

Ab tries to understand the scope of transgenders that are hiding in plain site.

19 thoughts on “Audiochat-Ab, Unreal 

  1. Zak

    Melanie trump has posed topless (her nipples look pretty feminine to me). Not saying there isn’t something strange about her but someone should grab those pictures and see if they were doctored. Her hips, legs, waist and breasts all look feminine when nude… if the photo is not doctored, I’d be interested to hear Unreal’s rebuttal… also, if he had researched the topic so thoroughly, why not mention she posed nude several times in the 90’s? Those photos come up rapidly on any search of her name. Are they fake or what ?

    1. Marin

      @Zak

      Those socalled nude pictures from her, which I have seen, were not that nude. You cann’t see the “reproduction organ”. Have you seen them?
      To me, she/he raises some questions as well.

    2. UNrealUNreal

      @Zak

      Your comment fail to mention any factual analysis of what differentiates the features of a man and a woman pertaining to Madam Trump. If there was a nipple test to forensically prove gender, i’d be interested in your sources. As it is, your arguments are constituted of merely sexuated slander*.

      There are objective observations that can be made of Melania Trump as she has fake breasts, male sized limbs and male facial features. In addition she/he has an uncanny tendency to occasionally show a male bulge**.

      *Nude photos taken by professional photographers are systematically enhanced in photoshop, curves added, color corrected, imperfections removed.
      **if you are new to the subject, it is important to know how transgenders “tuck” their male parts

  2. richard benedict

    @Unreal,
    here is a link from the forum that I posted on the transgender issue. I posted pictures of a boy posing as an actress with comments.

    “…The “actress” Hailee Seinfeld appeared in the 2010 Masonic movie, True Grit a remake of mason John Wayne’s 1969 classic. Wilson Bryan Key gives examples in his books of boys disguised as girls and the psychic whammy it puts on the percipient.”

    Read more: fakeologist.com…

    Look closely at the hands in the attached picture. It is the hands of a boy.

    haileetruegrit

    1. UNrealUNreal

      @richard benedict

      I didn’t notice your forum post before, it is really interesting.

      linking transgender with subliminal is quite to the point. There is something permanently subliminal in an EGI individual. When we are in their company, i’m sure that the smell-system and other senses can identify them as their true gender whereas our conscient is fully tricked. I think this conflict cause great stress and maybe even can make us ill ?

      Maybe we could combine the two threads on transgender into one ?

  3. Marin

    Hello Unreal

    You might very well be right about cellularpathologie, and Ab also made some very good points against chromosomes. I’m unfamiliar with Virchow, is he a suspicious researcher/entity ? I’m familiar with Dr. Hamer and through your link i discovered that he now propose audio healing with his ‘Mein Studentenmädchen, and also seem to propose educational material in english*.

    When I am not mistaken, the socalled cellularpathologie was developped between 1856 and 18 60. Although at that time there were peoples who were against this idea. The powerbroker’s behind the scene decided to push this one off. Same as with A. Bechamp, who discovered between 1856 and 1860 that a bodycell contains something with he started calling “microzymes” developped bacteria and fungi in certain situations, rediscovered and perfectioned by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer. Bechamp was Pasteur’s opponent and “they” decided to push the one off with Pasteur, who had cheated the whole bloody lot, because with Pasteur one could earn a lot of money. ( Douglas Hume: Bechamp or Pasteur: A lost chapter in the history of biology).
    I don’t know if can read the German language, if yes, go to:www.wissenschafftplus.de/…
    Here you will see on your right hand an article: Virchow – Stratege der Macht.

    By sheer coincidence Dr. med. RyKe Geerd Hamer discovered that Mein Studentemädchen had a hughe positive influence on a person who was in a biological conflictsituation or had heavy biological conflictsituations. The Germanische Heilkunde ( former named GNM = German New Medicine) consists of two pillars, the socalled 5 biological laws and Mein Studentenmädchen.
    As I do have all his books including his last book. In his last book he posted some letters from parents, including pics, that their retarded child, or child with Down’s Syndrom, were in healingprocess by listening day-and night to Mein Studentenmädchen. Which proves that the chromosome theory is not that “kosher”.
    Very interesting: www.youtube.com…
    Scroll down and you will see what I mean.

    Biologically do you not believe there is any material trace that can differentiate between a naturally born man or woman ? Some time ago i remember Madonna was rumored to have engaged special personnel to clean her tour-quarters for genetic material. I’m not certain of the validity of DNA, but what in your opinion can cell-analyses tell us ?

    Yes of course, one can trace that one back. Here Dr. med Ryke Geerd Hamer discovered that when a young child , depending on the conflictsituation, a boy can developpe feminine features or a girl manly features. Especially in his last book Mein Studentenmädchen he shows that one.

    Personally I don’t believe in the DNA structure, as long I haven’t see a pic made with a dark-field microscope. The pic’s they show you are computer-animations and if you look carefully a lot of them are not the same, especially the connections.
    Never believe mainstreammedia.
    See also a book Sartory and Hillman: The living cell.

    1. UNrealUNreal

      Hello Marin

      Your knowledge of medicine by far surpass mine. I will actually try to make use of Dr Hamers “Mein Studentenmädchen” for someone in my family, thanks for the link and new information (to me).

      Microbiology seem to be a minefield and surely we can’t rely on it for improving our health. I’m still curious to know what physical evidence that could help for defining gender, apart anatomy.

      Le ‘Microbisme’ est une doctrine fataliste monstrueuse qui suppose qu’à l’origine des choses, Dieu aurait créé les germes des microbes destinés à nous rendre malades.

      *Translated version:

      “Microbiology is a monstrous fatalistic doctrine which assumes that at the origin of things, God would have created the germs of microbes destined to make us sick.”

      I like this quote* from Antoine Béchamel!

      *www.psiram.com…

      1. Marin

        Hello Unreal,

        Your knowledge of medicine by far surpass mine. I will actually try to make use of Dr Hamers “Mein Studentenmädchen” for someone in my family, thanks for the link and new information (to me).

        Go to:www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj2xdCr7ZbQAhXFcBoKHQmdBPEQFghMMAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgermanischeheilkunde-drhamer.com…
        click on: online shop. Arrived there choose your language by clicking on language setting, which is for you French.
        Scroll down and you will see: categories de produits -> click on livres and the rest will follow suit.

  4. Tom DalpraTom Dalpra

    This audio at least made me smile. It’s probably the most incoherent I’ve ever heard UNreal be.
    It’s difficult to be coherent, I suppose, with no real firm foundation of an idea.
    Unnskyld meg, UN, but it’s an unskilled mess, to me.

    Having listened and looked at the thread here with it’s final Mark Sargent -like ‘sign-off’. ‘If you have any questions, here’s my email’ type-thing , I can only start to think that this looks like a deliberate effort at disinformation, UN.

    It’s like those others; Dallas Goldbug with his celebrity doubles or Mark Tokarski with his Joplin-is-Goodman stuff and celebrity twins nonsense. Here, I believe are further turds in the punchbowl of alternative theory.

    Suddenly, as Trump is perhaps the most talked about man in the world. Why waste the opportunity ? Don’t carefully make pains to explain how Democracy is an illusion; no, tell them his hot model wife has got a penis, ”tucked” away, and what’s more, they’re all at it. It’s part of their ‘magic’ you see.

    Just as with the Goldbug, disinfo model, aped by Mark Tokarki’s celebrity ”doubles and twins”, this method of disinfo’ seems favoured as it produces proliferating, walking ‘strawmen’, if you will. We hoi polloi like talking about celebrity. We’re fascinated by it. This stuff is a good way to spread nonsense.
    If we’re to believe Ed Chiarrini, loads of famous people are doubles – Mark Tokarski, they’re all ‘twins’ or in multiple roles and now with this idea from UN, we’re to believe many of the ‘elite’ were born the opposite sex ?
    Take your pick. Or is it all three ? Perhaps they’re all twin double transgenders ?

    rgos said – ”And Ab, have transgender.fakeologist.com…… at the ready.”

    Ha! Yes, and oh no! ha!
    I’m not sure it’s got the pull (‘not due to gravity?’) of FE, rgos, thankfully, but who knows what they might have ‘tucked away’ to draw a few more in and make us all look a bit silly by association?

    Trotting-out the Marshal Mcluhan quote to doubters of this ‘EGT’ idea as vercite did, (receiving two h/t’s -incidentally, on the main page of this site and on UN’s thread ) this week, seems weak.

    Many of us surely, around here, are well-aware of the idea of ‘The Big Lie’. The Mcluhan quote was on a banner on this site. That idea is taken as read around here, isn’t it ?
    You can apply it to any theory. It’s meaningless in context. Where’s the evidence?
    I’ve seen nothing really compelling for the case as yet. Only stuff that makes me think ‘Here we go again. More jolly old ”celebrity disinfo’ ”.

    1. UNrealUNreal

      Hello T. Dalpra

      The feeling is mutual, Tom*.
      Great constructive comment.
      Thanks for not mentioning Nicola Tesla’s own hand X-ray as you’ve heard it all before.

      *you might try Norwegian google translate for ‘tom’ too

      1. Tom DalpraTom Dalpra

        UNreal said – ”Thanks for not mentioning Nicola Tesla’s own hand X-ray.”

        You’re welcome, thanks for mentioning it. As far as I know it is not possible to tell the sex of someone just by looking at an X-ray of a hand.
        Looking at the bones of a skull or a pelvis can be helpful in deciding the sex of the owner but there’s enough overlap in male and female bones to even make even that inconclusive, I’m led to believe.

        With an x-ray of a hand, one can make an informed guess as to the sex of the owner, but it’s impossible to say with any degree of certainty, at all.

      2. UNrealUNreal

        Hello Tom

        Maybe your above statement does not even require an answer, as it is dishonest.

        it’s impossible to say with any degree of certainty, at all.

        It can not have escaped you that the hand is part of human anatomy which differs significantly between men and women. This can be demonstrated with a large degree of certainty, contrary to your claim.

        The degree of certainty of hand analysis ( index finger to ring finger length) can be evaluated, depending on your source, with an error rate between 4 and 15%. This is better than the error rate of a classical fingerprint which is 3-20% (depending on your source).

        The probability* that the two hands i presented, Mr Tesla and Mr Kölliker combined, are both female hands represent a 96% degree of certainty of belonging to two women.

        There is however no 100% failproof forensic evidence, and even fingerprints and DNA are disputed in courts as none of them are 100%.

        No doubts that you Tom, require more than DNA, fingerprints and hand analysis to be certain of anything, which is fine. However, all these methods provide an indisputable degree of certainty.

  5. rgosrgos

    Graham Greene, GG, 77.

    If I remember well, at one point in the book (Our Man in Havana) the protagonist comes up with proof of a nuclear plant. He shows them a drawing of a vacuum cleaner.

    Graham Greene must have been in the know.

  6. Marin

    This chat was absolute stunning. I really like the man talking. However I don’t go in with his take ( Unreal’s) on the cellularpathologie, which was developped by Virchow. The absolute genius Dr. Med. Ryke Geerd Hamer discovered that the brains decides. Mind-Brain-Body are one. Compare a person, animal or plant with a computer. The brain is the software and the body is the hardware.
    Dr. Med. Ryke Geerd Hamer has several times proven that for instance that “Down’s Syndrom” can be healed by conflictsolution and listening to his “Mein Studentenmädchen” www.germanische-heilkunde.at/index.php/startseite.html…
    www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj2xdCr7ZbQAhXFcBoKHQmdBPEQFghMMAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgermanischeheilkunde-drhamer.com…

    1. UNrealUNreal

      Hello Marin

      You might very well be right about cellularpathologie, and Ab also made some very good points against chromosomes. I’m unfamiliar with Virchow, is he a suspicious researcher/entity ? I’m familiar with Dr. Hamer and through your link i discovered that he now propose audio healing with his ‘Mein Studentenmädchen, and also seem to propose educational material in english*.

      Biologically do you not believe there is any material trace that can differentiate between a naturally born man or woman ? Some time ago i remember Madonna was rumored to have engaged special personnel to clean her tour-quarters for genetic material. I’m not certain of the validity of DNA, but what in your opinion can cell-analyses tell us ?

      *when i tried looking into Dr Hamer most of his work was in German

      XY-chromosomes-x-y-determinant-sexe-1

  7. vercite

    Unreal seems to have a good grasp of how this group operates at a high-level. He did a good job of providing a top-down introduction of the topic to what’s likely an uninformed audience, a good strategy to use since a bottom up presentation could be easily be misinterpreted in a negative way as denigration, hate, or a witch-hunt. I agree that few will ever realize the scope of this topic or come to understand the motives and methods of its participants. I don’t agree that religious sources should be disregarded simply because they are religious, especially considering the limited information that is currently available.

Leave a Reply