Hoi Polloi helps out with explaining how satellites are safer to simulate than actually launch.
“Patrix” and a very in sync Göteborg friend recently came on Fakeologist.com… to discuss their apparently indefensible opinion (which perhaps we might call the “Göteborg defense” from now on?) that satellites must be in existence because they cannot explain the power of signals any other way.Why did they treat their position so weakly? Why did people who claim to have expertise in signals not give one single layman’s explanation or even a technical explanation of how the signals work? They had given themselves at least an hour to speak and said virtually nothing, and Ab easily countered with reasonable opinions that they didn’t wish to discuss.