On XRays and Nooklear radiation Leave a reply +10 likes thisGreat interchange in our #alchemical-hustle thread. Justsayindude–Yesterday at 7:24 PM Ok so help me out here alchemical hustle Busters – I don’t buy, at all, not even slightly the nuke narrative and I am totally onboard with the overall atomic hoax. however in thinking about it I realised that there is a logical conflict that I can’t resolve that goes as follows my father was a vet and as I grew up I watched hundreds and hundreds of x-rays get taken by a very old, very simple looking X-ray machine the official narrative tells us there it is full of caesium (magic rocks) The device itself seemed very simple it plugged in, it had a small cone head, a shutter system with a light bulb and crosshairs that allowed you to adjust the rays that would emit from the machine to the size of the photographic plate. So here’s my question does anyone have a reasonable psychologist angle on x-ray machines? Especially would like to hear from @smj who can spot a hustle a mile off, but appreciate anyone’s input. Could magic rocks be partly true? Fakeologist, not psychologist Silverbeam–Yesterday at 7:40 PM I’ve had a few x-rays. It wasn’t faked. There are radiative phenomena outside the visible light spectrum I’m pretty sure. Is it a matter of so – small – they – are – invisible particles? Very hard to say. Justsayindude–Yesterday at 8:02 PM Hmm, good point light vs particles. I know the imaging process works and we know that radiation passes through us all the time. I guess the question in my mind is does that radiation spray out of a material that is contained inside that device? NEW MESSAGES smj–Yesterday at 10:14 PM roetgen rays came out of tubes. like crookes tubes andwhatnot. xrays are just another wavelength of that magical shit we call light. it can see thru skin but not barium andsoforth(edited) alfred loomis’ tuxedo park mansion where he hung out with onestone et al is now the tube musuem. museum means institute of the muses of course… www.tubemuseum.org… Justsayindude–Yesterday at 11:57 PM Yeah, I’m down with light we can’t see, used to do Rf, it’s all light really. I guess the question is what generates the invisible light called xrays? Is it hot rocks, or have they hidden some kind of cathode ray tube in a very small housing since a long time ago? It would actually be easy to test, as in theory it would draw no current while firing. Anyone here got an xray machine? October 18, 2017 Justsayindude–Today at 12:00 AM Hmm, just checked, first machine built just a few weeks after xrays discovered. Hmmm anounceofsaltperday–Today at 1:39 AM @Justsayindude Xray machines make disturbances in the Aether at higher frequency than light bulbs do.. that’s all en.wikipedia.org… X-ray X-radiation (composed of X-rays) is a form of electromagnetic radiation. Most X-rays have a wavelength ranging from 0.01 to 10 nanometers, corresponding to frequencies in the range 30 petahertz to 30 exahertz (3×1016 Hz to 3×1019 Hz) and energi… Nothing nukelar… entirely electromagnetic the trick with all this is the use of the word RADIATION associated with NUKELA If you hear the word RADIATION you get very, very, very nervous @Justsayindude at the same time, i am not suggesting that EMR is nothing to be amazed at. The Creator really has made an astonishing world Justsayindude–Today at 1:56 AM Fair call, it’s a fancy light bulb. Funny old world. And, if that is the hustle, it’s perfect because no one is allowed to, or would be brave enough to pull one apart. That said, my test remains valid – if it draws current when it fires, it would prove the hustle. Haven’t got an xray at work have you Frank? anounceofsaltperday–Today at 1:57 AM @Justsayindude they do draw current. They are plugged into the mains they are a fancy light bulb with “wave guides” very similar to a CRT monitor the Xrays are more harmful than microwaves Justsayindude–Today at 1:59 AM No, I know they are plugged in – that’s not the issue or the question. In theory, when firing the only thing that happens is lead shutters peel back to allow the caesium created rays out – no current required at that precise moment anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:00 AM what is the Caesium connection? Justsayindude–Today at 2:00 AM At least that was my understanding, maybe I’m wrong anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:00 AM no different in principle to a heat lamp just a different wavelength Justsayindude–Today at 2:01 AM Radioactive material contained inside the machine – that’s the narrative… But now I’m doubting myself anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:01 AM Ionising radiation hazard symbol Justsayindude–Today at 2:02 AM Off to check with uncle google anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:02 AM looks very like the nukelar symbol doesn’t it? roduction by electrons Characteristic X-ray emission lines for some common anode materials. Anode material Atomic number Photon energy [keV] Wavelength [nm] K?1 K?1 K?1 K?1 W 74 59.3 67.2 0.0209 0.0184 Mo 42 17.5 19.6 0.0709 0.0632 Cu 29 8.05 8.91 0.154 0.139 Ag 47 22.2 24.9 0.0559 0.0497 Ga 31 9.25 10.26 0.134 0.121 In 49 24.2 27.3 0.0512 0.455 Spectrum of the X-rays emitted by an X-ray tube with a rhodium target, operated at 60 kV. The smooth, continuous curve is due to bremsstrahlung, and the spikes are characteristic K lines for rhodium atoms. X-rays can be generated by an X-ray tube, a vacuum tube that uses a high voltage to accelerate the electrons released by a hot cathode to a high velocity. The high velocity electrons collide with a metal target, the anode, creating the X-rays. In medical X-ray tubes the target is usually tungsten or a more crack-resistant alloy of rhenium (5%) and tungsten (95%), but sometimes molybdenum for more specialized applications, such as when softer X-rays are needed as in mammography. In crystallography, a copper target is most common, with cobalt often being used when fluorescence from iron content in the sample might otherwise present a problem. Xrays are created with a vacuum tube… just like an old television or Cathode Ray Tube screen Justsayindude–Today at 2:04 AM I have just figured out I am officially an idiot – no idea where I got that idea from anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:04 AM the same place we all get it from… we are DELIBERATELY given muddled data Justsayindude–Today at 2:04 AM Ah yes, lots of muddle to clear out. Sorry for wasting your time anounceofsaltperday–Today at 2:05 AM i consider time spent in what we just did to be the most productive use of “time” your view of the falsehood of nukelar has been strengthened and you will now be conscious of the number of people that think “radiation” and nukelar are the same thang Justsayindude–Today at 2:12 AM Yeah, funny, I already knew he difference, and the hustle. Now I’m just dumbfounded how I had that understanding in my head. Ah well, as someone who discovered fakery, finding out I’m wrong is nothing new Got mixed up with this narrative somewhere along the line Devices Gauging devices are used to measure, monitor, and control the thickness of sheet metal, textiles, paper napkins, newspaper, plastics, photographic film, and other products as they are manufactured. Nonportable gauging devices (i.e., gauges mounted in fixed locations) are designed for measurement or control of material density, flow, level, thickness, or weight, and so forth. The gauges contain sealed sources that radiate through the substance being measured to a readout or controlling device. Portable gauging devices, such as moisture density gauges, are used at field locations. These gauges contain a gamma-emitting sealed source, usually cesium-137, or a sealed neutron source, usually americium-241 and beryllium. anounceofsaltperday–Today at 3:03 AM @Justsayindude the first radiation emitting substance was “radium” “discovered” by Marie and Pierre Curie Radium was discovered long before “nuclear physics” existed @Justsayindude . this entry says that Radium WAS USED in portabe X ray machines… so YOU WERE CORRECT!!! en.wikipedia.org… Marie Curie Marie Sk?odowska Curie (; French: [ky?i]; Polish: [k?i?ri]; 7 November 1867 – 4 July 1934; born Maria Salomea Sk?odowska; [?marja sal??m?a skw??d?fska]) was a Polish and naturalized-French physicist and chemist who conducted pioneer… Justsayindude–Today at 3:08 AM Thanks @anounceofsaltperday i was struggling with some serious self doubt there anounceofsaltperday–Today at 3:10 AM Now i am trying to find what her theory of radiation was… the one she won the nobel prize for such answers do not come easily www.nobelprize.org… a key point here… Lastly, certain of the radioactive substances have a special property which bears no direct relation to their beams. This is to make temporarily radioactive all the bodies in their neighbourhood, by producing a radioactive emanation which communicates the radioactive property to the surroundings. I now conclude that Uranium is “made radioactive” by being radiated upon Radioactivity is simply what the name implies, substances which emit Electromagnetic Radiation… EMR ? 1 Substances like Caesium etc must be like rechargeable batteries of EMR They call the discharging of energy of Caesium etc “Half life” so that means we have made brilliant use of the past hour of our lives @Justsayindude and we can confirm that “radioactive materials” simply give off the same rays as Electric X Ray tubes Justsayindude–Today at 3:31 AM Hey, good call. That is actually significant anounceofsaltperday–Today at 3:32 AM yes… i think we have tumbled it @Justsayindude as an aside, have you watched Netflix show “The Good Place” ? Justsayindude–Today at 3:39 AM Can’t say I have anounceofsaltperday–Today at 4:00 AM a VERY interesting show about the afterlife Justsayindude–Today at 5:20 AM Hey Frank ( @anounceofsaltperday ), appreciate the heads up, but don’t have netflix. Anywho, the more I think about it, the more I think, that is a bit of a major. On the one hand, you have magic hot rocks releasing magic xrays. On the other hand, you have a copper/gold/iron etc cathode dunked in low pressure inert gas releasing xrays. Boomshakalakah baby, magic hot rocks not required. Metal, electricity and gas equals magic hot rocks. That is NOT insignificiant. Well done Audiochat | Radio/Audios | If links are dead, archives are here | Savedthreadedchat | FlatologistShare this:FacebookTwitterWhatsAppMorePinterestSkypePress ThisLinkedInLike this:Like Loading... Related No tags for this post.