The controlled war on men

The Proper Ganderlikes this

…courtesy of the intelligence media and their owners. The Larry Nassar case is just another chapter in the phony trials of the #METOO phony/staged revolution.

Miles Mathis hits this one out of the park, in his dissertation on the gymnastics fake trial.

mileswmathis.com…

In my opinion, this project isn’t being promoted to protect women from men. It is being promoted to split the sexes further, making women distrust men even more than they already do. The project is long, and this is only the latest version of it. And why are the sexes being split? Several reasons, but the central one is financial. The industrialists figured out long ago that single people spend far more money than couples, especially if the single people are sexually repressed and miserable. There is a multi-billion dollar market in anti-depressants to start with, and if people aren’t depressed enough they can be made so. Splitting the sexes is the number one method of creating that misery, since the only better way to make people miserable would be to take away their food. The industrialists also have a lot of junk food to sell, so that won’t work. But it isn’t just anti-depressants. Miserable single people spend far more on compensating products, like comfort food, clothes, make-up, toiletries, drugs, gym
memberships, hair treatments, facelifts, cosmetic dentistry, massages, therapy, porn, and on and on.
The sexes are also being split for other reasons, perhaps the most important of which is the complete de-masculating and detoothing of men. Taking away the wives and lovers of men, and making men the target of societal hatred, censure, and distrust, is a planned and so-far successful method of destroying them. And why would the industrialists wish to do that? Because any potential revolution would come from men. Men have almost all the testosterone, and so the more the governors fear revolution the more they will try to destroy the motivation, ambition, and energy of men.

Anyway, when you see crimes profiled on 60 Minutes before they have even gone to trial, you should know you are witnessing another project. News programs should be reporting on crimes after convictions have been handed down, not a year before. For one thing, such programs should prejudice a jury, making prosecution more difficult. Courts have to find unbiased jurors, remember, and if all the jurors are prejudiced by watching 60 Minutes beforehand, that is quite hard to do. This is why real courts don’t like media circuses. Only fake CIA courts like media circuses, since that is the whole point. Another reason the media doesn’t report extended testimony before real trials is that they can open themselves up to lawsuits. What if Nassar had been found innocent? In that case he could then sue the girls, CBS, and the rest of the media for slander and libel.

Leave a Reply