NASA thought gatekeepers

mattiFayelike this

NASA’s biggest role is to gatekeep the wrong belief about the earth, space, and the stars, and to imprint this wrong theory in every child ever born.

I don’t know if Simon’s Tychos model is correct, but at least he has an alternative to the visual evidence we can all observe.

An interesting post on Hubble and Rhodes. I like the part about “recovering the United States.” Was it ever really lost?

“In the 21st century it is high time that independent thinkers break all ties to academia and begin forming our own parallel system of scientific development and achievement.”

The TYCHOS model • Re: Testing TYCHOS: PVP Parallax Experiments www.cluesforum.info…

9 thoughts on “NASA thought gatekeepers

  1. smj

    according to wiki an arcsecond is:

    A second of arc or arcsecond is a unit of angular measurement which comprises one-sixtieth of an arcminute, or 1/3600 of a degree of arc or 1/1296000 (approximately 7.7×10-7) of a circle. It is the angular diameter of an object of 1 unit diameter at a distance of 360×60×60/(2pi) (approximately 206,265 units), such as (approximately) 1 cm at 2.1 km, or, directly from the definition, 1 astronomical unit at 1 parsec.

    …modern wizards claim to make parallax measurements in micro-arcseconds, smh. we’re told kapteyn had his own potentially habitable planet, it is estimated to be 11 billion year old by the proper experts of course…

    In 2014, Kapteyn’s Star was announced to host two planets, Kapteyn b and Kapteyn c. Kapteyn b is the oldest-known potentially habitable planet, estimated to be 11 billion years old.[8]

    en.m.wikipedia.org…

  2. Vespadouglas

    at this moment its blatantly obvious that abs site has been targeted and infiltrated by all kinds of actors. i am not surprised that more than a couple of cf members are either migrating to to abs site to push their BS or “voicing their disinfo” on the cluesforum. what im not so sure about is why the hosts of the two most important websites on earth are tolerating it……..freemasons , media types , “ex” military , and careerists are everywhere………..prime example is crass dave…active since 2009 , finds fakeologist in 2018 via who fucking knows and 5 minutes later ab gives him a “key”…….strange indeed……and as for the christian crusaders selling their shite fables , gtf

    1. Hoi PolloiHoi Polloi

      I agree that Fakeologist is highly infiltrated, but I don’t think CluesForum is as infiltrated. And it’s not fair to compare them either because Fakeologist is literally one of the most open networks ever created and CluesForum is literally one of the most closed and specific, for its particular stated purpose of developing peer reviewed media forensics.

      So if you could please be specific about what you consider ‘freemasons , media types , “ex” military , and careerists are everywhere’ posts on CluesForum, I would appreciate that. We heavily moderate our forum. Like with a very heavy ban mallet.

      Look at places like GodLikeProductions or David Icke forum or other shit shows and you’ll hopefully see that we are actually making a genuine effort to moderate and we are doing a pretty okay job. So please, once more, if you have a complaint about some *specific* examples you can give where we have deliberately given platform for agents and liars for the purposes of spreading disinfo, please link to them.

      I don’t think it’s fair to say that we “tolerate” such posts or to allege that we do it for some reason other than normal moderation such as giving new members some minor benefit of the doubt before they can be questioned and/or reveal where they really stand.

      If you are just stirring shit for attention and/or you will not give specific examples, I certainly hope nobody will believe anything you are spreading that remotely resembles slander of the sites you claim to be a fan of.

      1. Vespadouglas

        “cluesforum is not AS infiltrated” …….. if i shit twice in your bathtub , is shitting once in your swimming pool , “not AS bad”

      2. Vespadouglas

        “slander (strange term) of the sites you claim (strange term) to be a fan of”……..yet your opening line is an agreement of fakeologist being infiltrated……do you not “claim” to be a fan of fakeologist……should ab consider your comment as slander

  3. simonshacksimonshack

    Dear Xileffilex,

    I know – but it’s not like ALL independent thinkers are on the same page (in all areas of knowledge)! Let us not become suspicious about any independent thinkers (such as this David Robison, who appears to have a good grasp of astronomical matters) just because they still haven’t wrapped their minds around (i.e. ‘woken up to’) the GSTS (Grand Space Travel Scam).

    1. xileffilex

      Fair point, Simon – actually I did write a coda to my comment along those lines – that all of us are at various stages of waking up/none of us has exact hoax congruence – but deleted it. Perhaps I should have left it in. Cluesforum was the biggest resource for waking me up to space fakery. GSTS is the biggest comedy show on earth, I wish Mr Robison could join in the fun soon.

  4. xileffilex

    I read the CF link before spotting your mirror, Ab. I was surprised to see the cited “independent thinker” refer to the Challenger disaster without qualification, as if it were real.

Leave a Reply