Detailed talk on the phony Corona test

Be the 1st to vote.

45-80.33% false positive test has the world in lockdown.

[The Infectious Myth] David Rasnick on the Coronavirus #theInfectiousMyth
podplayer.net/?id=100654049 via @PodcastAddict

No tags for this post.

1 thought on “Detailed talk on the phony Corona test

  1. napoleon wilson( non mason )napoleon wilson( non mason )


    What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate uncertainty?
    If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be
    assigned the new ICD code. It Is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.
    If “pending COVID-19 testing” is reported on the death certificate, this would be considered a pending record.
    In this scenario, NCHS would expect to receive an updated record, since the code will likely result in R99. In
    this case, NCHS will ask the states to follow up to verify if test results confirmed that the decedent had COVID19.

    Do I need to make any changes at the jurisdictional level to accommodate the new ICD code?
    Not necessarily, but you will want to confirm that your systems and programs do not behave as if U07.1 is an
    unknown code.

    Should “COVID-19” be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test?
    COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is
    assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based
    on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent had other chronic
    conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part
    II. (See attached Guidance for Certifying COVID-19 Deaths)
    www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/cor…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.