Are psyops and endless inflammation of differences being used to distract from the employment elephant in the room?
Here are an interesting two posts on the worst forum ever to read.
Fill your trolley full of shopping, then walk out the shop. The machinery as you walk out will scan your ID and credit card and you’ll pay automatically. No remembering PIN numbers or queueing at the checkout. We already have self-checkout where we do that job ourselves.
No pickers and packers in warehouse distribution online shops. All automated. Just have a techy on hand to sort out any problems.
No break times. No getting to work late due to traffic congestion or too much beer the night before. No toilet breaks. No wages. No holidays. No illness albeit the occasional breakdown or service. No wage rises. No union walk outs. No workplace bullying or sexual harassment. No workplace injury or death compensation pay-outs.
Much higher production rates. No human error.
AI isn’t going to be needed….just automation, with very little pre-programmed control.
What will we all do then? Will we all live on welfare payments and just sit in the sun all day twiddling our thumbs.
Smart people are enmeshed more than the average man with wild expectations foisted upon them from the cradle. To what financial or social benefit would be calling out lies and deceit serve? Adults already know in their deep subconscious that they are ruled by forces they cannot name or even point to. What parent would encourage their child to pursue truth over financial security, independence and acceptance?
This is a story about how when you remove fear from any group or religion you lose control.
It’s clear that people want to live in fear, or are at least so used to it that they cannot accept any alternative, no matter how much more beneficial it may be. Our controllers know this, and play to it in their stagecraft every day. They rule by fear. This is why we call these events psyops. They play to the most powerful motivator in your mind.
This is instructional for fakeologists, because we are the equivalent of media heretics. Heretics have a very grim history.
We don’t believe in the “hell” that is laid out for us by the controllers, and for that, we are rebuked.
In the end, we will prevail. Just like in this audio. Just like in this movie.
The story of Reverend Carlton Pearson, a rising star in the evangelical movement, who cast aside the idea of hell, and with it everything he’d worked for over his entire life.
It’s difficult to be a dissenter. We often feel the need to go along with what others in our group think, and neuroscience shows that this desire for conformity isn’t just the result of peer pressure. It is wired into our brains.
Any leader that hints at sharing the wealth and helping the people will be targeted.
In Toronto, we had Jack Layton and Rob Ford actors that were similarly removed from the public scene.
These are my favorite type of posts. Good job Mark!
I think this is a widely-used model, not only in remote places like Chile, but in the United States as well. We saw John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and John Lennon all idealized, lionized, and then, like Allende, assassinated. All of these assassinations were fake, we now know. That is not the point – each man was but a scoundrel used to raise up our hopes for meaningful change and then to crush that hope.
That, to me, is the meaning of 9/11/73 – crushing hope. It is a common treatment used everywhere to control us, keep us in chains.
A common theme in all hoax/psyops is you never get enough information to form a resolution: both the official and alternative stories are always incomplete. This forces your brain to fill in the blanks, which helps you convince yourself that you’re right.
In essence, gaslighting, where they place conspiracy in the culture and then deny its there when you point it out, calling you crazy.
This is an attempt to come up with a set of criteria by which we can judge whether a terrorist event is real or fake. I put together a list of behaviors by police, medical and news people. My idea is to take that tragic event and by objective standards judge it to have been real or staged. Because I wanted a two-column format, I ended up typing it out in Excel and then doing screen caps. I broke it down in to the crime scene, the police and medical responses, the behavior of news outlets, and the investig