Category Archives: Comments on other forums

I’m on my side

likes this

Good comment.

The sloppy execution of fake events may serve the purpose of dividing the observing public into two lists: The people who believe whatever they are told by “authority”, and the other people. Could they be compiling a list of people who see through the fakery? Once they have such a list then is it possible they would want to recruit some and eliminate the rest? Were this done systematically enough they might anticipate dividing the public into distinct classes of sheep and wolves. Operation Condor indicates to me that this sort of thing has already been done, and next time around they may hope to do a “better” job of it.

Since you are reading this blog, which list do you think you are on ?

Comment on In Defense of Miles Mathis by Alan Ackley cuttingthroughthefog.com…

Joshin’ about this fetid stew

Be the 1st to vote.

Good luck navigating the infinitely nested single comment on the Mathis fan blog.

Pingbacks are an automatic feature of WordPress. I think this is the only Pingback site (or non) to link to the Josh site.

I have decided to delete all the pingbacks from fakeologist. I can’t stop them from linking to my blog, but I’d rather they didn’t. They promote obvious disinfo like Flat Earth & “transvestigations” along with dishonest, hypocritical shills like Weisbecker. So I don’t want them trying to blackwash this site or Miles by mixing it in with that fetid stew.

We need to use discernment, and the fakeologist approach of promoting every cockamamie theory in the name of having “an open mind” simply won’t do. We need sharp minds armed with good defense mechanisms in order to thwart the non-stop attempts to stir our brains.

Comment on In Defense of Miles Mathis by Josh cuttingthroughthefog.com…

Airport security = big money

napoleon wilsonAA ProperGander Morrislike this

The business case for airport security (theater).

I don’t think body scanners see much more than metal. I still opt out, and accept a pat down.

I like the part about the random (fake) alerts on the scanners, and that people reward themselves in times of stress.

Lets think about the business case for a moment. Currently airport companies make about 50% of their income with services (shops, restaurants etc.) and of course 50% with start and landing fees. When flights are delayed people spend more in airports. When security checks are longer, people are forced to be earlier at the airport. Then they buy water (you are not allowed to carry water, you might… what exactely?) for an exorbitant price, than food, parfume, chocolate or whatever. That is probabily the issue. In Munich, recently, I saw you can get a massage, cut your hair or get your fingernail done! All that in addition to buing food and drinks or shopping. So I guess the stress we are experincing at the security check is part of the plan. Allegedly, when people get under stress they tend to reward themselves more. Mentioning the cancer inducing effect of the check could be a hoax. Why? I flew this week for a couple of days to Portugal. I went through the machine (full body scan, 3D) and it „rang“. So the security man had to do a body check on me. Problem is, I was wearing a T-shirt, shorts, sneekers and not much else. Not even a watch. So I looked over the shoulder too see the monitor myself. It was highlighting my arms, and especially where you would carry a watch. Only, I did not. So the machine could be a box with random numbers, who knows.
One last comment: the flight back was canceled and we spent 12 hours at the airport. Slept on the floor, bought very expensive water (I would refill, but sometimes they dispence only warm water, sometimes it tastes disgusting).
Airports are weird business models.Comment on In Defense of Miles Mathis by Andrea cuttingthroughthefog.com…

A good argument against comments

likes this

It’s hard being a moderator. I leave comments open to approved users to find pearls in the mud. They are few and far between, but so far, I think it’s worth the effort.

Is it really wise for me to provide the manure with which people intend to throw at me? I do not think so. That is like an assassin saying to me, “Mr. Sibrel, I would like to shoot you, yet I have no bullets. Will you please give me some for my gun?”, and then me saying, “Sure! Here they are!”, and thus providing the very means for my own murder.

www.thesleuthjournal.com…

Front men are necessarily actors 

Caryslike this

Great comment:

And finally for today, I just wanted to share a thought based on the reference above to “high-ranking officials are largely actors” and that this is one of the big secrets that limited hangouts try to distract from.

The actor theory may or may not be true, and the theory that actor-leaders are one of the truths limited hangouts are hiding may or may not be true, but they are interesting questions. One thing that strikes me, though, is that actor-leaders aren’t that well-hidden a secret. Or, to put it differently, it’s a secret hiding in plain sight.

People mocked Reagan for being a former B-movie actor without realizing that his experience had something to do with his being chosen. Trump’s experience as a reality tv-star and Wrestlemania character is similarly mocked without being considered as the basis for his selection by TPTB or indeed, part of the training they put him through with the Presidency in mind as a possibility.

This site’s work on all the former rock stars who ghosted and in some cases reappeared makes a lot of sense in the context of actor-officials.

And indeed, the concept of a “front man” is well-understood: “a person who represents an organization and works to make its image more appealing to the public.”

And finally, this reminds me of something that people have said before, which is that Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World were not “dystopian visions” but descriptions of the contemporary and future state of the art of power and control. And Big Brother is clearly a larger-than-life but actually non-existent front man.

Similarly, the Wizard of Oz movie was quite explicit about the fact that the “Great and Terrible Oz” is controlled by “the little man behind the curtain.”

We’re all in Plato’s cave, watching the shadows flickering on the wall. And, just like with Wrestlemania, we WANT to suspend our disbelief. We want to believe that our cheerleading and voting and outrage in the Clinton-Trump show somehow mattered, in spite of the obvious fact that 1 vote out of 120 million is meaningless (and the count is rigged anyway). So we don’t want to think of these people as actors.

But why wouldn’t they be? It would be silly for the controllers insist on being the stars of the show all the time. Sure, they get tempted sometimes, and sometimes do it. But certainly there are some powers behind the scenes. If there aren’t, then the world of power is more chaotic than competent controllers would want it to be. Think of it like a movie. The producer wants to tell a story, make some money, mesmerize the audience, and maybe influence their thinking a little. And it’s probably easier to do that with a glamorous front man actor. Sure, the producer might cast his cousin in a main part, and he might even give himself a cameo, but the important thing is for the movie to WORK on the audience, to not flop, to make money.

The most powerful people in the world would rather CONTROL things than campaign and make speeches all day and draw the ire of half the country. The most powerful people in the world didn’t get BEATEN by community organizer Barack Obama in a power competition, they HIRED him for a pageant.

We all know all this and don’t know it at the same time, in different proportions. Even among truth seekers like ourselves, who among us has no emotions about Trump and Hillary? It was a hell of a movie!

Comment on Boston Marathon, nodisinfo.com…, Dave McGowan and limited hangouts by Cassandra Hollingsworth pieceofmindful.com…

Yoga hoax comment indicates more censorship

Be the 1st to vote.

U-tube must be deputizing anybody to censor comments and videos, and now playlists.

Time for people to migrate to their own websites, or other youtube like sites, or just plain old torrent sharing free programs to pass around videos, like resilio sync.


h/t Xileffelix

Pay for mention on noagendashow

Be the 1st to vote.

Made a donation/advertising buy on noagendashow.com… and got a mention for the site. I also got a few other mentions in for septemberclues.info… and September Clues, not to mention hoaxbusterscall.com….

Curry claims he’s never heard of September Clues. He also doesn’t remember the interview below from January 2013 with Markus.  John agrees that 9/11 being a media hoax is just as good an explanation as any. John also got indignant at the nuke hoax lie.

Two points regarding this donation. One, I think it is the way of the future for funding media. I prefer it to subscriptions for paying for what I consider good entertainment. Second, I think it’s quite possible these two are happy gatekeepers. I do think they do more good than harm, and I have benefitted from their discussions, including those on technology that I like using. Like everyone else out there, I don’t agree with everything they say – but don’t have to and don’t expect to.

English: Adam Curry portrait

English: Adam Curry portrait (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Computer columnist John C. Dvorak.

Computer columnist John C. Dvorak. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No Agenda Show 891

Markus Allen interviews Adam Curry

 

Download

 

The Rant Man Talks About 9/11

Be the 1st to vote.

I asked Randy to comment – and he did right away!

I am a big uber(man) fan – as a customer and a (very part time) driver.

Here’s his uber channel.

Virology fakeology

Be the 1st to vote.

Do you think that viri exist at all? The whole science of virology I contend is a hoax, like nuclear “science”. Who has access to these electron “microscopes”? Are these images all phony or fabricated as well? They are as controlled as powerful telescopes. Anything we cannot sense with our 6 senses is subject to fabrication and fakeology – from very small to very large.

The delusion of the masses

Be the 1st to vote.

My comment: Couldn’t agree more. The fact that “experts” agree that the twin towers were demolished by two planes and their hot fuel etc. etc. despite “science” saying it’s not possible is proof enough that an entire population will go along with an illusion just to stay in the herd. Check out cluesforum.info… and fakeologist.com… for more.

Have you heard of the McMartin Preschool Trial? If not, you probably think it is unlikely that the majority of experts on any given topic could be fooled. But trained persuaders see a world in which everyone is living in an illusion all the time. When a million people share the same illusion – even if they are recognized experts – it doesn’t tell you much about reality. It only tells you those experts were persuaded in the same direction. By something. That something might be the truth. But there is no reason to think so. Thus, trained persuaders tend to be skeptical of experts – no matter how unified those experts are – because mass delusions among experts is normal and expected.According to science.

Source: Trump: Man of Science? | Scott Adams Blog

Putin the actor

Be the 1st to vote.

hoi.polloi wrote:I’m sorry to do another “post and run” but hopefully because it’s the Chatbox and because I explain why I am posting this, it will be accepted.Take a look at this strange moment with Putin. The interviewer asks him about missile defenses and Putin just chuckles. Could it be that we have the reason, right here on CluesForum, about why he’s laughing — he knows the “missile defense shield” stories pushed by the military intelligence controlled media are just hot air? full link:

I think you’re watching a composite – are you sure the back of the head shot is Putin’s? I’m not.The biggest joke is we don’t see Putin EVER speaking English – even though I am certain he’s fluent in it being Jesuit trained. Another world “leader” playing his role.

Source: View topic – THE “CHATBOX” • Cluesforum.info…

Continue reading

Do you believe in Ken O’Keefe?

Be the 1st to vote.

HowIseeit seems real (and makes phone calls to bewildered bureaucrats and media gatekeepers), and someone he looks up to does not.

Is Ken controlled opposition? He certainly talks a big game, and resonates with those who dislike government.

Here’s my comment:

Love your work, but are you sure Ken is telling the truth? Controlled opposition is meant to scare you and keep you from investigating. You seem real – but what proof do we have that Ken is? Two dud names and numbers is a clue that something’s wrong with his story. He’s ex-military – are we sure there’s such a thing? Can you be ex-military and still get a pension? Further, are we sure that these body scanners are dangerous? Alex Jones tells us so – do you believe him? I think all the security is just theater, and expensive theater at that.

Love your work, but are you sure Ken is telling the truth? Controlled opposition is meant to scare you and keep you from investigating. You seem real – but what proof do we have that Ken is? Two dud names and numbers is a clue that something’s wrong with his story. He’s ex-military – are we sure there’s such a thing? Can you be ex-military and still get a pension? Further, are we sure that these body scanners are dangerous? Alex Jones tells us so – do you believe him? I think all the security is just theate

Russianvids does 9/11

Be the 1st to vote.

I still enjoy Russianvids’ stuff, even though he just can’t apply his normal logic to 9/11. Why is 9/11 so hard for people to deconstruct? Is it just too big of a lie?

This proves you can’t agree with everyone about everything…not that it’s necessary.

You’re analyzing fabricated footage (ie. a movie). The two buildings were brought down like any other buildings. Anything you’re watching was done in a studio and portrayed as LIVE (inverted is EVIL). Nothing hit the towers. The hole (if there even was one) could have easily been created with conventional explosives. Re-watch septemberclues.info…. Also, who died? Do you have the names? Are they on the memorial website?

The jews founded america and invented english?

Be the 1st to vote.

It may be time to start ignoring Zack.

3:01 the jews founded America? Do you think the Pope is a jew too? Try listening to johnnycirucci.com… for 5 minutes… Rome and the jesuits are a more likely group to run the world than jews who couldn’t even get in the country let alone run everything.