Category Archives: Comments on other forums

Front men are necessarily actors 

Caryslike this

Great comment:

And finally for today, I just wanted to share a thought based on the reference above to “high-ranking officials are largely actors” and that this is one of the big secrets that limited hangouts try to distract from.

The actor theory may or may not be true, and the theory that actor-leaders are one of the truths limited hangouts are hiding may or may not be true, but they are interesting questions. One thing that strikes me, though, is that actor-leaders aren’t that well-hidden a secret. Or, to put it differently, it’s a secret hiding in plain sight.

People mocked Reagan for being a former B-movie actor without realizing that his experience had something to do with his being chosen. Trump’s experience as a reality tv-star and Wrestlemania character is similarly mocked without being considered as the basis for his selection by TPTB or indeed, part of the training they put him through with the Presidency in mind as a possibility.

This site’s work on all the former rock stars who ghosted and in some cases reappeared makes a lot of sense in the context of actor-officials.

And indeed, the concept of a “front man” is well-understood: “a person who represents an organization and works to make its image more appealing to the public.”

And finally, this reminds me of something that people have said before, which is that Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World were not “dystopian visions” but descriptions of the contemporary and future state of the art of power and control. And Big Brother is clearly a larger-than-life but actually non-existent front man.

Similarly, the Wizard of Oz movie was quite explicit about the fact that the “Great and Terrible Oz” is controlled by “the little man behind the curtain.”

We’re all in Plato’s cave, watching the shadows flickering on the wall. And, just like with Wrestlemania, we WANT to suspend our disbelief. We want to believe that our cheerleading and voting and outrage in the Clinton-Trump show somehow mattered, in spite of the obvious fact that 1 vote out of 120 million is meaningless (and the count is rigged anyway). So we don’t want to think of these people as actors.

But why wouldn’t they be? It would be silly for the controllers insist on being the stars of the show all the time. Sure, they get tempted sometimes, and sometimes do it. But certainly there are some powers behind the scenes. If there aren’t, then the world of power is more chaotic than competent controllers would want it to be. Think of it like a movie. The producer wants to tell a story, make some money, mesmerize the audience, and maybe influence their thinking a little. And it’s probably easier to do that with a glamorous front man actor. Sure, the producer might cast his cousin in a main part, and he might even give himself a cameo, but the important thing is for the movie to WORK on the audience, to not flop, to make money.

The most powerful people in the world would rather CONTROL things than campaign and make speeches all day and draw the ire of half the country. The most powerful people in the world didn’t get BEATEN by community organizer Barack Obama in a power competition, they HIRED him for a pageant.

We all know all this and don’t know it at the same time, in different proportions. Even among truth seekers like ourselves, who among us has no emotions about Trump and Hillary? It was a hell of a movie!

Comment on Boston Marathon,…, Dave McGowan and limited hangouts by Cassandra Hollingsworth…

Yoga hoax comment indicates more censorship

Be the 1st to vote.

U-tube must be deputizing anybody to censor comments and videos, and now playlists.

Time for people to migrate to their own websites, or other youtube like sites, or just plain old torrent sharing free programs to pass around videos, like resilio sync.

h/t Xileffelix

Pay for mention on noagendashow

Be the 1st to vote.

Made a donation/advertising buy on… and got a mention for the site. I also got a few other mentions in for… and September Clues, not to mention….

Curry claims he’s never heard of September Clues. He also doesn’t remember the interview below from January 2013 with Markus.  John agrees that 9/11 being a media hoax is just as good an explanation as any. John also got indignant at the nuke hoax lie.

Two points regarding this donation. One, I think it is the way of the future for funding media. I prefer it to subscriptions for paying for what I consider good entertainment. Second, I think it’s quite possible these two are happy gatekeepers. I do think they do more good than harm, and I have benefitted from their discussions, including those on technology that I like using. Like everyone else out there, I don’t agree with everything they say – but don’t have to and don’t expect to.

English: Adam Curry portrait

English: Adam Curry portrait (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Computer columnist John C. Dvorak.

Computer columnist John C. Dvorak. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No Agenda Show 891

Markus Allen interviews Adam Curry




The Rant Man Talks About 9/11

Be the 1st to vote.

I asked Randy to comment – and he did right away!

I am a big uber(man) fan – as a customer and a (very part time) driver.

Here’s his uber channel.

Virology fakeology

Be the 1st to vote.

Do you think that viri exist at all? The whole science of virology I contend is a hoax, like nuclear “science”. Who has access to these electron “microscopes”? Are these images all phony or fabricated as well? They are as controlled as powerful telescopes. Anything we cannot sense with our 6 senses is subject to fabrication and fakeology – from very small to very large.

The delusion of the masses

Be the 1st to vote.

My comment: Couldn’t agree more. The fact that “experts” agree that the twin towers were demolished by two planes and their hot fuel etc. etc. despite “science” saying it’s not possible is proof enough that an entire population will go along with an illusion just to stay in the herd. Check out… and… for more.

Have you heard of the McMartin Preschool Trial? If not, you probably think it is unlikely that the majority of experts on any given topic could be fooled. But trained persuaders see a world in which everyone is living in an illusion all the time. When a million people share the same illusion – even if they are recognized experts – it doesn’t tell you much about reality. It only tells you those experts were persuaded in the same direction. By something. That something might be the truth. But there is no reason to think so. Thus, trained persuaders tend to be skeptical of experts – no matter how unified those experts are – because mass delusions among experts is normal and expected.According to science.

Source: Trump: Man of Science? | Scott Adams Blog