Man on the street interviews are a favorite.
It’s amazing how long you can live with a lie without it killing you. I’d say then remaining fake moon walkers are a hardy bunch.
Amusing pin story, coupled with his painting of the fake moon shots, complete with moon dust.
He was one of the fiestier interviewees on this staged mockumentary.
Start at 10:20
Simon doing what he does best.
“EXPLAINING” the transparent Apollo 11 ass-true-nots
It is quite amusing (or tragicomical) to read the various “explanations” offered by self-professed film/video experts for the transparent Apollo 11 asstronots…
Apollo, and more space hoaxes • Re: The MOON HOAX www.cluesforum.info…
Simon’s ability for being succinct, snarky, and smart make him one of the best exposers of psyOps, hoaxes, and media swindles. Social media THIS to all your contacts and ask them if they still believe man went anywhere near the moon.
Sadly (yet this is not to admit defeat!), the repetitive power of this massive, ongoing (multi-billion $) psyop scheme may be its greatest “strength”, as the efforts of normal (inquisitive) people such as this forum’s valiant contributors may eventually wane due to sheer exhaustion. This is hoping we can overcome this natural, inherent weakness of human nature, and keep doing what we’ve done here at Cluesforum for this last decade – lest our children have to “start from scratch” all over again! Whatever will be the case in the future (and however future generations will judge it), I will remain jolly proud of having started this discussion board – with Hoi Polloi’s precious help: we both called it an “experiment” at the time. Well, this (now almost decade-long) grassroot experiment seems to have been, all things considered, a darn good one – and if you’ll allow me to paraphrase an infamous quote, it’s been “a small step for a man – but a giant leap for mankind”.
Simon, can we please have one of these graphics per PsyOp, including recent ones, to explain and share the power of the media to make us beLIEve fairy tales?
NASA’s biggest role is to gatekeep the wrong belief about the earth, space, and the stars, and to imprint this wrong theory in every child ever born.
I don’t know if Simon’s Tychos model is correct, but at least he has an alternative to the visual evidence we can all observe.
An interesting post on Hubble and Rhodes. I like the part about “recovering the United States.” Was it ever really lost?
“In the 21st century it is high time that independent thinkers break all ties to academia and begin forming our own parallel system of scientific development and achievement.”
The TYCHOS model • Re: Testing TYCHOS: PVP Parallax Experiments www.cluesforum.info…
Fake items in this story:
NASA-guardians of space and psience fakery.
Astronaut Scott Kelly had an identical twin brother when he ventured into space and set the record for most consecutive days spent in orbit, but not anymore.
Does this video convince you that these are two different human beans?
Continuing our series on how the less educated, or more correctly, those not subjected to the Great American PsyOp, see through the lies and do not believe the lies Americans are religious about.
Yeah, and he just thought that was horrible, that people would want to do that. And it’s not like I’m trying to play the devil’s advocate with him a lot of the time, but I’m, you know– this is a guy that also– just understanding these people do not– I was really surprised about how many of these countries didn’t believe the United States put a man on the moon.
Yeah, they do not think we put a man on the moon. The Chinese, for the most part, didn’t think we did. Southeast Asian countries. Yeah, I mean, the Africans. Even the Indians, college educated Indians, and they’re like, no, we’re pretty much sure you guys didn’t.
The only major achievement of NASA in the last 48 years (i.e. between 1969 and 2017) has been that of training their ass-true-not actors to act in a considerably more relaxed fashion – as they poop their smelly lies out of their asses. (Simon Shack, December 2017)
The onion is thick.
As it happened, I ran across a compelling “confession” by Stanley Kubrick to having faked the moon landing, which I knew he had done and therefore found highly plausible. It turned out to be a cleverly staged piece of fakery, where the man conducting the interview is also the director, offering him instructions as to how to respond to questions he is asking in order to convey the intended impression of this actually being Stanley Kubrick actually confessing to having faked the moon landing, when it’s an actor who is simply playing a role. I sent the original out to a large list of correspondents, which I had to retract when I discovered that I had been played by a hoax about a hoax?
Add fake ingredients like subs, NASA, numerology – and you’ve got what it takes for some fake baked story.
I’m still convinced subs are props from a by-gone era. Even if they were real, what use are they today? Why would any navy bother with them in the age of air power?
This has nothing to do with the shape of the earth – but everything to do with the liars simulating space travel.
I know this adds fuel to the DBA-discredit by association-of flat earth and NASA lies, but the question is still valid and the Mark Kelly answer still a poor try to cover up a the lie.