Category Archives: Power Structure

Who runs (ran) the place

AA ProperGander Morrislike this

IN THIS work we are not concerned with the methods, legal or illegal, by which the great American fortunes of today were created. These fortunes exist. Their potentialities for good or evil are not altered whether we accept Gustavus Meyers’ account of their formation or whether we give credence to the late John D. Rockefeller’s simple statement : “God gave me my money.”
What this book purports to do is to furnish replies, naming names and quoting book, chapter, and verse, to two blunt questions: Who owns and controls these large fortunes today, and how are these fortunes used? To answer this second question it is necessary, of course, to examine the role of great wealth in politics, industry, education, science, literature and the arts, journalism, social life and philanthropy.

www.freethechurch.org…

h/t https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/11/21/vexmans-thoughts-business-as-usual/#comment-57654

Biggest world franchise conquers a new country

Be the 1st to vote.

While the most fantastic distraction ever to occupy Andrew White’s house was tweeting, the world’s biggest corporation was expanding its tentacles into the country that we are told controls the US.

Although subscribers to the “Joose control the US will” will see this as more proof of their belief, it’s easier for me to see it the opposite way. The US controls and occupies almost every worthwhile country on earth. Is this what most Americans support and wish to pay for? Do most Americans even know this fact? Not while the Kardashians and Trump dominate the media.

For the first time in history, the United States on Monday established an official, permanent military base in Israel: an air defense base in the heart of the Negev desert.

www.businessinsider.com…

Where in the World Is the U.S. Military? – POLITICO Magazine

Despite recently closing hundreds of bases in Iraqand Afghanistan, the United States still maintains nearly 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and territories abroad—from giant “Little Americas” to small radar facilities. Britain, France and Russia, by contrast, have about 30 foreign bases combined.

By my calculation, maintaining bases and troops overseas cost $85 to $100 billion in fiscal year 2014; the total with bases and troops in warzones is $160 to $200 billion.

Weather modification history and Rothchild’s Red Cross

Be the 1st to vote.

I don’t think man can make a hurricane, but I do believe he’s trying to at least steer them.

I think it’s akin to making a few waves in an ocean, but I am open to the possibility.

More serious than youtube adsense

el sushi de la manchalikes this

Getting kicked off youtube is one thing, but getting off a major dns provider is quite another.

This, of course, is how sites like even fakeologist may disappear from general perusal. Just de-list them. I’m hopeful that there will always be a dns provider available that won’t censor.

Completely decentralized DNS servers is the way to go. Therefore I recommend NOT giving your info to a biggie like GoDaddy.

I will reconsider my listings on another big server in the future.

This is how the nutwork does their Hegelian dialectic: use a controlled group to comment on a #HRDPAR about a vicsim, insult them with “hate” speech, and shut them down effectively by delisting them.

When you own all the players, it’s easy to control the outcome.

A leading neo-Nazi website is losing its internet domain host after its publisher posted an article mocking the woman who was killed in a deadly attack at a white nationalist rally in Virginia. GoDaddy tweeted late Sunday night that it had given The Daily Stormer 24 hours to move its domain to another provider because the site has violated the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based company’s terms of service.

Source: GoDaddy boots neo-Nazi site after article mocks Charlottesville victim | Toronto Star

Mel Gibson-from the Superclass?

Jack33likes this

The more I try and figure out who “they” are, those that rule over us, the more I think there is a superclass. They aren’t aliens, reptiles, or jews, but  a morpheus group that defies labeling.

Miles Mathis does his usual geni breakdown of Mel Gibson. I’m not too interested in the exact lineage, but I do agree that it really shows their is the uber rich, or superclass, and the rest of us.

All the war and divide and conquer is to keep us from learning about “them”.

Here’s the summary of the latest MM essay, telling us why Mel Gibson does what he does:

You may ask why a popular actor would agree to have his name dragged through the mud, as Gibson’s
has been in the past decade. I would guess it is because they all see it as a game. Besides, Gibson
likely sees it as an assignment. It is a job like any other: it is what agents do. Remember, Hollywood
was absorbed by Intelligence many decades ago, and all actors are agents. This is just the theatrical
division of Intel. Gibson got to be the hero for many years, and maybe he got tired of it. He wanted to
switch sides and play the villain—always a more interesting part. Also remember that he is being
cleansed. In cases like this, the blackwashing is only temporary: it is eventually followed by a
whitewashing. My guess is they will reinvent Gibson as the hero again. We see the first act of this new
play in the Jewish press, as above, with Gibson being sold as a new Schindler. In a few years, Gibson
will be cuddly and embraceable again, with the past decade only adding a richness and depth to his
character. You will forget you were ever supposed to hate him. What you won’t forget is how you have
been changed and formed by this project, and all their other projects. While Mel was going from hero
to villain to hero again, you were being trained to distrust men, feel queasy about the heterosexual
relationship, look sideways at religious people, and hate anyone who questioned mainstream dogma in
any way. You won’t hate Mel anymore—because he will have learned his lesson—but you will
automatically hate anyone who questions Holocaust figures, questions 911, or questions any other
“fact” of the promoted history.