Category Archives: Science hoaxes

DNA is a hoax 

el sushi de la manchaUnreallike this

DNA is simply digital blood testing. There is no double helix, no RNA, no way to narrow down who you are by spitting into a cup. I doubt chromosomes exist too, in reality, our micro world is as fictive as our macro outer space world. You’re looking at made up art and science fiction concepts.

The 23 and me and ancestry tests are also pure fiction. The application simply gives them enough info to fit you in their massive family tree,which is full of countries and ethnicities for them to tell you about.

Here’s a clip from trashing the tests, helping prove a larger lie.

No tags for this post.

Did the 9/11 WTC memorial flood for Al? 

Be the 1st to vote.

He said it did. 

Al invokes his southern drawl to get passionate about his going g Green to save the world myth and drags the old 9/11 bathtub canard out to do it. 
I don’t know which myth is bigger.  

No tags for this post.

Hawking a hoax

likes this

At 1:35:33, @adamcurry actually questions  Stephen Hawking and calls it a hoax. Another leak in the gatekeeping. 

Great story on data roaming in Europe as well. 
* Duration: 2:45h, Played: 1:35h

No tags for this post.

DNA hoax 

likes this

Further to the concept that micro space science is most likely a hoax, I propose that DNA itself is a hoax. There are no double strands, and I am skeptical about chromosomes as well. 

In 1986 or so DNA testing came online. What else happened at this time? The widespread use and mass production of the micro processor. 

My guess is that computers and blood tests were integrated to database the micro characteristics of blood. While ordinary record keeping is good for general characteristics, only a computer can keep track of millions of variables. 

Even the language surrounding DNA testing is amusing. Mini and micro satellites are in our blood and part of the test!…

In its earliest incarnation this technique was performed by restriction of 0.5–10?g extracted DNA using the restriction enzyme HinFI, followed by Southern blotting hybridisation designed to bind to multiple ‘minisatellites’ present in the restricted DNA

No tags for this post.

Hawking a hoax 

Be the 1st to vote.

Update: New ALS drug? Has Stephen Hawking been using this drug the whole time? Coincidence or deliberate that Hawking is now in a new cosmo nonsense series?


In one of the most blatant cases of (simulated) disabled abuse, we have another silly story.

Leave it to renowned physicist Stephen Hawking to be the bearer of incredibly interesting yet wildly depressing news about the state of the world. In his forthcoming documentary for BBC, Expedition New Earth, Hawking predicts that planet Earth will only survive for the next 100 years.…

I hope no one is paying attention to this simulated psientist. If people really thought about it (and they don’t) they might ask has does someone with ALS survive so long? What is the secret?

Who wrote the software to convert cheek twitches into complex written theories? That guy is the real genius.

Sometimes I think we will make it off this planet before everyone realises that we can’t.

Hawking has a rare early-onset, slow-progressing form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that has gradually paralysed him over the decades. He now communicates using a single cheek muscle attached to a speech-generating device.……

The average life expectancy of a person with ALS is two to five years from the time of diagnosis. However, it varies greatly:

  • Over 50 percent of people with ALS live more than three years.
  • Twenty percent live five years or more.
  • Ten percent live 10 or more years.
  • Five percent will live more than 20 years
No tags for this post.

CC 17 : Waking up to 

el sushi de la manchalikes this

Hoi, KHam, Rochello, Farcevalue, and El Sushi talk about the satellite hoax (it’s really just one big near shore big cable network). 

No tags for this post.

The Climate Science Debate Illusion 

Be the 1st to vote.

Illusions are certainly related to fakeology.

Today I declare the climate science “debate” to be mostly an illusion. You think you live in a world in which there are climate science skeptics on one side of the debate, and climate scientists, plus their believers, on the other side. And you think they are talking about the same thing. That isn’t what’s happening. It’s mostly an illusion.I mean this literally. You perceive a debate, but that is mostly a shared hallucination.

Source: The Climate Science Debate Illusion | Scott Adams’ Blog

No tags for this post.