Category Archives: Cluesforum/September Clues

9/11 no plane original

antipodeanlikes this

Here’s a good interview with the brother of one of the first public no planes 9/11 advocate.

Tuesday, October 8, 2019 in the USA and Wednesday, October 9, 2019 in Sidney, Australia, Rollie Quaid had a conversation with the co-founder of Permaculture, David Holmgren about his late brother Gerard Holmgren.
Gerard was dubbed the father of the “no planes theory”, which is essentially that no planes made any impact on the towers, pentagon or even crashed in Shanksville during 9/11.

cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?…

No tags for this post.

What about all the amateur footage on 9/11

likes this

A post highlighting the main purpose of this blog, from the September Clues Tour Guide.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION N°2:

Q: “What about the many private videos of the 9/11 events showing the plane crash?”

A: All the alleged “Amateur” stills and videos depicting crucial moments of the day (“planes”/“tower collapses”) are forgeries – and demonstrably so. The “9/11 plotters” manufactured a large image-pool to be attributed to private cameramen for three main purposes :

  • 1: To imprint the notion that many bystanders captured the event on film
  • 2: To supply more shocking and memorable close-up views of the event
  • 3: To outweigh the poor LIVE TV show with a great number of shots

 

The skeptics argue that “too many videos of the airplane were captured, therefore all cannot be fake …” Too many indeed: there are a simply ludicrous amount of “lucky” shots. In fact, the sheer amount of existing ‘airplane’ images is grossly absurd in itself: We now have more than 45 “amateur videos” (some of which were released – inexplicably – as late as June 2008!). We also have at least 10 still pictures depicting alleged “Flight 175” “in its very last second of flight”:

Source: SeptemberClues.info | The Central Role of the News Media on 9/11

911 AMATEUR 2:

911 AMATEUR 3:

No tags for this post.

ARE MILITARY CASUALTIES SIMULATED?

Be the 1st to vote.

Ladies and gents, We have seen how the alleged 9/11 victims were fictitious/simulated entities made up out of thin air – and entirely crafted in the digital domain with facial morphing softwares (today readily available to consumers) such as this. This discovery has led me to ask myself: so what about the US military casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan – and other war zones? Could they possibly also be – at least partly – simulated ? This will of course sound like an extreme, “unthinkable” supposition. We

Source: View topic – ARE MILITARY CASUALTIES SIMULATED? • Cluesforum.info

Update 9/2019 from Simon:

Dear all, I have taken a short break from my cosmic research these last couple of days – as I realized that my original post(OP) of this important thread had been “sabotaged” once again: all the linked images to the MilitaryTimes war memorial had disappeared, due to their URL’s being changed (for the second time, since my OP back in March 2013). This forced me to patiently reconstruct the entire post, by recapturing these (new / currently-working) image URL’s one by one. As I did so, I also found further “problems” with that memorial website – and decided to update my OP with these new findings. I have to say, in hindsight (and with what we now know regarding the capabilities of face-morphing softwares), that my OP – that I wrote more than six years ago – still stands the test of time. I honestly think that it’s now high time to address and diffuse (over the internets) this vexing issue with renewed ardour and energy; I personally refuse to live on a planet where such blatant deception – as documented below – can endure and remain unnoticed by most people in this world for so many years.

No tags for this post.

What about the 9/11 amateur fauxtographers?

napoleon wilson( non mason )likes this

An excerpt from the September Clues tour guide, which I will be highlighting over the next few days during hoax appreciation month.

If you understand the 9/11 hoax, you will understand just about every major scary media event.

The skeptics argue that “too many videos of the airplane were captured, therefore all cannot be fake …” Too many indeed: there are a simply ludicrous amount of “lucky” shots. In fact, the sheer amount of existing ‘airplane’ images is grossly absurd in itself: We now have more than 45 “amateur videos” (some of which were released – inexplicably – as late as June 2008!). We also have at least 10 still pictures depicting alleged “Flight 175” “in its very last second of flight”:


  1. What about the many “amateur videos” we have seen?
    FAQ2: www.septemberclues.info/faq_2….

911 AMATEUR 1:

videopress.com/v/dqv5gq4w

911 AMATEUR 2:

911 AMATEUR 3:

No tags for this post.

Message from Simon

Be the 1st to vote.

A message from Simon, my favorite writer of any prose relating to 9/11 or other worldwide deceptions – the man who started it all for me in understanding how the world’s rulers really work.

…the demolition of two empty towers in Manhattan kicked off a glorious era of enlightenment for humanity at large. The sheer crassness of the 9/11 hoax has awakened millions of individuals all over the world to the pathetic machinations concocted by the sorry little clique of rogue, “supremacist” psychopaths that pretends to rule over the fine people of this otherwise magnificent planet. Mass deception is their chosen strategy to uphold their ill-gained privileges – and it has certainly worked quite nicely for them for many, many years. However, their antics have become painfully transparent in later times – and there can hardly be today any thoughtful person (worthy of this description) who hasn’t started seeing through their self-serving propaganda.

Let 2019 mark the beginning of a new – and genuine – “Age of Reason”.

Source: View topic – 9/11 anniversary • Cluesforum.info

No tags for this post.

NASA Going Nowhere Since 1958

Be the 1st to vote.

H/t Simon

Wonder why Jeranism hasn’t been deleted off youtube? Those who remain on this “platform” (to me youtube is now a publisher – and liable) is more suspicious than anyone who has been booted.

No tags for this post.

Never question a tragedy

Be the 1st to vote.

Miles says it’s the ultimate protection of a hoax.

To start with, tragedies act as the greatest confirmation of projects, since they are unanswerable. They defy analysis and questioning, since (almost) no one wants to question a tragedy. It can so easily be dismissed as heartless that no one wants to go there.

He goes on to discuss the Space Shuttle Hoax. Did Simon really break the Challenger hoax vicsim Asstruenots story or was his a republish?

mileswmathis.com/shut.pdf

No tags for this post.

Moon landing hoax debunkers have nothing

Be the 1st to vote.

The NASA anti-hoax team doesn’t have much to debunk the biggest space hoax in their history, the first one, the Apollo 11 moon landing on a Hollywood soundstage.

Fifty years after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon, some people insist it never happened and was all a big hoax by the U.S. government. The suspicions arose even as the lunar landing was taking place in 1969, said Roger Launius, NASA’s former chief historian. Soon, conspiracy theories that said it was an elaborate, Hollywood-style production created on a soundstage on Earth started to take root.

Source: 50 years later, some still believe the moon landing was faked. Here’s why it wasn’t – National | Globalnews.ca

Cluesforum Moon Hoax page

No tags for this post.

Moon hoax arising

Be the 1st to vote.

Simon says Buzz is NASA’s biggest liability – but does anyone care?

I keep wondering what a true statistical study would conclude – as to the ratio of people buying (or not buying) the 50-year-old Apollo TV hoax. Alright, so a Youtube comment section is no serious indicator of general public opinion – and can hardly be used for any “statistical” study of any kind… Nevertheless, I find it rather fascinating (and very encouraging!) to scour through the comment section of this YT video (with over a million views) featuring Buzz Aldrin. Please spend a minute or two chec

Source: View topic – The MOON HOAX • Cluesforum.info

 

No tags for this post.