The only major achievement of NASA in the last 48 years (i.e. between 1969 and 2017) has been that of training their ass-true-not actors to act in a considerably more relaxed fashion – as they poop their smelly lies out of their asses. (Simon Shack, December 2017)
Simon can be like a cat playing with a mouse on his forum. I’m surprised it’s taken this long for him to get ready to jettison this “ISS” fauxtographer – if not put the entire taking pictures discussion in clues’ derailing forum.
As I’ve said before, it’s very hard to even take a steady shot of the very slow moving moon with my P900. How anyone could even dream of taking a picture at night of this fictional “thing” is beyond my wildest imagination, given the official story of its size, distance, and speed.
Dear NotRap,Thanks for the link to that thread on asterisk.APOD(dot)com ( a forum hosted by NASA ). It was an interesting and entertaining read. Fraudsters are everywhere, see? So what’s your final take on Bianconi’s “ISS” imagery? Is it legit? A “yes” or “no” answer will suffice. Of course, more profound comments of yours will be a bonus.Seems like some nasty meteorites have crashed into the E and F sections of the “ISS” radiators…Rest assured, dear Notrap, that no paranoia is to be found in my soul : if your personal verdict is *I think it’s legit!*, my ego won’t be butthurt – nor is there any hostility on my part only for trying to comprehend your stance on this. Just share your thoughts with us, will you please? My stance is the following: the Bianconi images were crafted using a poorly-maintained chocolate-scale-model of the “ISS”. To be sure, Bianconi is a regular contributor to NASA’s very own… “APOD” website (Astronomical Picture Of the Day: en.wikipedia.org… )
Simon has such a way with words.
I have a P900 – and I can barely capture the moon at full zoom – and it isn’t even moving that fast (or am I on our spinning ball?).
There is no way anyone could possible capture the fictive ISS, if, as we are lied to, is going 17,000 miles per hour. Without some sort of computer tracking device, it’s just not physically possible.
If anything representing the ISS is flying by, it’s some sort of high altitude plane. I am sure no one could see the ISS based on its fake altitude and size, so I don’t even know why Simon is entertaining the thread at all.
Dear NotRap,I applaud you for your valiant efforts in trying to snap the sharpest possible image of that (ever-changing & seemingly “shape-shifting”) speck of light traversing our skies known as “the ISS” ( aka “the Thing”, on this forum). I’ll be eagerly awaiting your next set of pictures.In the meantime, let me just post (for comparison) a few images of the “Thing” – which I recently added to my ever-growing collection of “ISS” imagery :These are two images which one Barbara Mueller sent me a few weeks ago. She says she used a handheld Nikon P900 camera to snap these two shots:
One thing the 9/11 hoax taught all of us is the central role of the media and the individuals that it’s comprised of.
Start at 41:46
Knowing this fact, when we see a massive media storm involving its own members, we must be suspicious of the story in part or in full. A clue to something not being right is the long list of celebutards and media stars, past and present, being used to promote this media storm.
In the latest of a growing number of sexual harassment or assault allegations against Kevin Spacey, former Boston ABC affiliate news anchor Heather Unruh held a news conference this morning to claim the actor assaulted her son in 2016 when he was 18 years old.
This former anchor, possibly retired like many females who hit the age wall (one could argue unfairly), looks like she sheds a real tear here:
(a clip of her reporting on the Boston Bombing hoax is near the end)
…but fails to find any moisture in the constant dabbing here:
Her story, similar to this one, of her son being traumatized and running home to grandma’s, is quite unbelievable.
How an 18 year old cannot handle himself and acts like a small child in an adult situation makes one wonder if he exists at all.
Trying to figure out the true point(s) of the massive media campaign to bring down Hellyweird producers and actors is difficult.
Know for sure that when the media must call upon its own to make the story/case, that you are probably witnessing an elaborate psyOp where there is far more to the story.
h/t noagenda show
I admit to still watching Casey. He and his (not admitted to) team do some amazing videos. One thing I noticed that almost every NYC video he does includes the new One World Trade Center, even if it’s just a flash.
Clearly he’s being used to appeal to a whole new audience to sell psyOps. Sadly, he’s good at it.
Still hasn’t topped our 9 hour FAC.
Thanks, everyone. Please let us know what you think of our latest monstrosity of an audio … an unprecedented 7 hours of CluesForum meditations, including four new hours with a very special past guest! Issue 23: Hi, ‘Does Rocketry Work in the Vacuum?’
Simon has great posts.
As I woke up this morning, this old musing of mine was trotting in my head: “exactly what type of folks are recruited for these staged shooting events.”? So I decided to spend an hour or so seeing if I could learn some more about this ‘headshot’ Braden Matejka chap – the “miraculous Las Vegas survivor”.
London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere • Re: Las Vegas Harvest 91 concert mass shooting, 2/10/17 www.cluesforum.info…