9/11 Vicsim Report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center>'''This page is under contruction'''</center> | <center>'''This page is under contruction'''</center> | ||
<center>'''Please see the discussion page for this page'''</center> | <center>'''Please see also the discussion page for this page'''</center> | ||
{| class="wikitable" align=right | {| class="wikitable" align=right | ||
| colspan=2 align=center | <big>'''Vicsim Report'''</big> | | colspan=2 align=center | <big>'''Vicsim Report''' 9/11</big> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan=2 bgcolor=yellow | | | colspan=2 bgcolor=yellow | | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| <small>Year</small> || align=center | 2009 | | <small>Year</small> || align=center | 2009 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| <small>Authors</small> || [[User:Hoi Polloi|Hoi Polloi]], | | <small>Authors</small> || [[User:Hoi Polloi|Hoi Polloi]], Clues Forum and [[User:simonshack|Simon Shack]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan=2 align=center | '''Topics''' | | colspan=2 align=center | '''Topics''' |
Revision as of 16:15, 17 December 2017
Vicsim Report 9/11 | |
Type 1 | War Preparation |
Type 2 | Simulated Terror Attack |
Category | Technology |
Year | 2009 |
Authors | Hoi Polloi, Clues Forum and Simon Shack |
Topics | |
• 9/11 | • vicsims |
Information | |
Cluesforum | [CF 1] |
Other |
The Vicsim Report is an in depth research about the vicsims of 9/11 compiled by Hoi Polloi. Simon Shack, producer of September Clues describes it as follows: "The 80-page Vicsim Report was put together by Hoi Polloi (assisted by yours truly) during Hoi's six-month-long stay in my home back in 2009. It represents the seminal groundwork for what has developed over the years into an extensive collective investigation - enriched and refined by the fine efforts of all our dedicated forum members. Throughout these last three years of unrelenting 'vicsim' research, we have collected a vast body of converging findings which, taken together, strongly suggest that our tentative, initial postulation - i.e. that no one perished on 9/11 - was correct. To this day, we have not encountered any substantial, compelling or - much less - official refutation of our working thesis - nor have we ever been formally confronted by any verifiably legit family member of the alleged "3000" 9/11 victims."