Conspiracy narrative

The term conspiracy narrative describes the Fakeological hypothesis that the manifestation of conspiracy theories within the discours of Military Psychological Operations is not a naturally occuring effect triggered by a PsyOp but a professionally designed and managed integral, structural and strategic constituent of Military PsyOps.
The Military Intelligence Apparatus has at their command the necessary infrastructure, technology, resources and funds, to guarantee the maintenance of conspiracy narratives over decades, as the example of the JFK assassination and the PsyOp 9/11 show us.

Objectives

Conspiracy narratives
1. prevent, inhibit, prohibit the identification of what really happens, who did it, what the motivations were, what the aims are;
2. expand the impact of the PsyOp within society by producing material goods, amusement articles, music, films, etc., entertainment, etc. based on the content of the conspiracy narratives;
3. transform institutions or parts of such, e.g. laws, rights, arts, educational curricula, etc.;
4. establish new, better conditions for the Dispositif of Power as a result of the PsyOp. E.g. symbolic or territorial privileges, concentration of legislative or executive powers, culminating in the State of Exception and the totalitarian rule after the PsyOp 9/11.

Informal types of conspiracy narratives

Event

Event conspiracy narratives aim to disinform, deceive, manipulate and alter the public perception about a Military Psychological operation which appears as an event or a series of connected events. Examples: JFK assassination, 9/11, Apollo program.

Discours

Discours conspiracy narratives aim to dominate, shift, alter or exchange the characteristics of the discours in a particular field of knowledge, social life, private life, work, etc. Examples: Space travel, serial killers, Transgender Agenda.