Corona main › Forums › Suspicious Media Events › Monster Truck Accident
Tagged: apeldoorn, assault, attack, monster truck, queen's day 2009
- This topic has 55 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 1 month ago by
rgos.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2014 at 6:39 am #48257
rgos
ParticipantFakeologist expertise needed.
http://nos.nl/video/703780-monstertruck-rijdt-in-op-publiek-schokkende-beelden.html
Is it real or is it fake?
Looks quite real.
But then there is this:
And this, our favourite striped attire:
And do I spot a hint of Duper’s Delight?
October 2, 2014 at 7:01 am #48260rgos
ParticipantAnd this almost seals it. The website of the organizer of the event:
http://sterevenementen.nl/automotor.htm
Star Events. Smell the hoax.
October 2, 2014 at 7:35 am #48309rgos
ParticipantHow could I have missed this one: Haaksbergen. Haak is Dutch for ‘hook’.
October 2, 2014 at 7:56 am #48311rgos
ParticipantPrior art in Mexico:
October 2, 2014 at 8:05 am #48314rgos
ParticipantWatch the image wobble. The software probably has the same glitches Simon Shack has already analyzed in the case of the Shuttle launches.
This event was in Hilversum, the Dutch media capital. Come on guys, update that software suite. You can do better than that.
October 2, 2014 at 8:34 am #48361rgos
ParticipantSome times media events are too fresh to call psyOps. Start the thread here and we will move it if it becomes clear it’s a psyOp.
Any minute now, Ab.
October 2, 2014 at 9:16 pm #48918xileffilex
Participantfile under drill; nobody was injured in the production of this latest Dutch hoax; of course, not a single person is filming it from the opposite direction.
October 3, 2014 at 10:29 am #49498rgos
Participantof course, not a single person is filming it from the opposite direction.
Opposite camera angle at the 0.21 mark. Blurry footage, though.
You can just smell the psyop, but judging from the footage it is a tough call.
October 3, 2014 at 2:05 pm #49651xileffilex
ParticipantOpposite camera angle at the 0.21 mark. Blurry footage, though.
quite right, but the footage is deliberately blurred. I just love it when the camera goes haywire. To the fore in the “bystander” video material from the Boston marathon. Not even a tough call. Low budget, closed event, invited audience, only 5 deaths to create.
Has “drill” written all over it
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/23135707/__Vrees_voor_meer_doden__.htmlOctober 3, 2014 at 5:52 pm #49880xileffilex
Participantrgos – did you notice the 2013 Mexican video of a blueprint incident which the BBC helpfully linked to? Pellucid hoax. We can look forward to more Ned-Mex productions in the future.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-24422678Any sign of any autopsies being carried out? Of course not.
October 3, 2014 at 6:24 pm #49882Tom Dalpra
ParticipantGreetings guys,
Having not quite got to the English translation from that interesting looking alternative site regarding Queen Beatrix and mock sacrifice, I’ve only really looked at a few clips posted.
It would be easy enough to pull-off, you’d think? – Drive into a prepared area – People scatter screaming – Tell them 5 people died under the wheels- Put it on the television- Job done. People could take as many photographs as they wanted. What could they see?
If you can pull-off a psyOp from within a crowd it gives it built-in credibility. I see this with the football ops of Hillsborough, Ibrox, Bradford and Heysel.
People were there. They saw it. They even filmed it. But what did they see and film?
xileffilex pointed to a lack of clear-view footage. We find one film, but it’s deliberately blurred.
The set-up of the arena would mean there was limited visibility. There’d be control.So yeh, very doable. What’s the deal here though?
Why?
Well you know my motto? ”Keep it simple”.
My best take is: It’s a Health and Safety drill combining
big-trucks-crushing-people-in-the-street affirmation, juxtaposed Mr Cees Hamelink’s ‘subversive’ pro-Putin talk, as a mass subliminal. This all in line with standard policy still led by ancient ‘ritual’.Maybe
DalTampra
October 4, 2014 at 8:04 am #50622rgos
ParticipantNow we’re at it, it is also very reminiscent of this incident:
What was/is your take on that one?
October 4, 2014 at 8:40 am #50699rgos
ParticipantHadn’t noticed before, but the obvious question seems to be: what is that jib (boom camera) doing there so strategically close to the obelisk? (0.15 mark second clip)
October 4, 2014 at 9:35 am #50771rgos
ParticipantLooks like a dummy to me.
October 4, 2014 at 5:41 pm #51189xileffilex
Participantoh wow, rgos. that was one which passed me by, living on an island moored off Europe; seems like they rehearsed it in 2007 – see this flickr series
A good stunt to pull, with skilled stunt people diguised as police.
Here are the photos of the 2009 drill by Martijn Oorthuis
…hard to see if they are dummies or crisis actors. The ludicrously restricted view camera platform was clearly integral to the hoax, as too were those stepladders for the camera operators – one of which was the car’s target, along with the monument itself. The stunt-policewoman outrider plus the policeman in high-viz bib and sleeves were the triggers, co-ordinated with the position of the bus which the cyclist was leading. Why a pre-crashed car, though? But then the Woolwich planted Vauxhall was pre-crashed also. Same ideas running through all these scams.
Another top-class show from the Dutch. I take my bowler hat off to you.October 4, 2014 at 7:58 pm #51299Tom Dalpra
ParticipantCRIKEY!
This policeman(?) didn’t even seem to notice it!
Keeping focus in the ‘chaos’, perhaps?The other guy was more than aware. Was he really hit or did he just fall dramatically?
This guy failed his driving test.
There’s the Royal Bus in the background. It’s just happened and they were ready for this shot.
”The work by artist Menno Jonker resembles a box containing seven blue and white balloons, representing vulnerability, festivity and mourning”
What a load of old balls! ”Vulnerability, festivity and mourning” haha.The guy was seemingly a nothing sort of character. An average Joe. A lone actor, ”according to his parents, Tates held no ill will towards the Royal Family and had described the Queen as a “stabilizing force”.” Haha, fair enough! He just obviously had the odd whim to plough through innocent bystanders in an attempt to attack them with his car.
It can happen. Obviously!
”A few hours after the attack Queen Beatrix addressed the nation in an emotional video message.
What started out as a beautiful day has ended in a terrible tragedy that has shocked all of us. People who were standing nearby, who saw it happen on television, all those who witnessed it, must have been watching in astonishment and disbelief. We [the Royal Family] are speechless that something so terrible could have happened. My family, myself, and, I think, every person in the country feels for the victims, their families and friends, and all who have been affected by this incident.”
These things, of course, serve to ‘unite the country’ and ‘give it focus’ whilst ensuring continued ‘security’.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_attack_on_the_Dutch_Royal_Family
DalTampra
October 5, 2014 at 6:02 am #51862rgos
Participantoh wow, rgos. that was one which passed me by, living on an island moored off Europe;
In a sense, it passed me by as well. At the time you could just smell the psyop, but I still did not have my Fakeology goggles firmly attached.
It’s a bit JFK-like, isn’t it, with the bus turning around the corner?
Names and numbers flashing all over the place.
And they immediately knew who did it: Karst Tates.
(Tat-es: “Did it” in German. Our royalty, like the British, are from German origin as well)
Monument by Menno Jonker (Junker)
11 on the bus
69 on a T-shirt
38 year old suspectOctober 5, 2014 at 7:56 am #51985Tom Dalpra
ParticipantHAPPY QUEEN’S DAY
When we look at the set-up, a stunt, is obviously the most likely scenario.
The latest monster truck debacle with a vehicle running people over, serves as a jogging of that dramatic memory.The fact it’s a monster truck this time helps it get into our heads.
We see that the two incidents are part of a carefully programmed and coordinated campaign of Dutch domestic psyOpery.
DalTampra
October 5, 2014 at 8:07 am #51987rgos
ParticipantHAPPY QUEEN’S DAY
Thank you.
When we look at the set-up, a stunt, is obviously the most likely scenario.
Yes, stunt and drill. Two sides of the same coin.
October 5, 2014 at 8:11 am #51988rgos
ParticipantOr should I say:
Stunt and Drill, they go hand in hand…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.