- This topic has 44 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Somewhere on this site, a couple of years ago, I had written the following (can’t find exactly where now):
Stories are the foundation of human behavior. In that, we seem to diverge completely from the rest of life.
This does not necessarily mean that the stories the human mind needs to function are a negative thing. Stories are the signposts that guide thought. Without them, humans wouldn’t exist. Sometimes we may be led to believe that it would be best if we didn’t… but then who would acknowledge our inexistence?Once upon a time, apparently, our stories however seemed to have not been written even though writing had been invented. To our current way of thinking this may seem a very imbecile falacy, as an account that is not written can easily be subject to alteration. This didn’t seem to bother much our ancestors, if this assumption is true. In fact, I propose that this made perfect sense for a different kind of mindset, perhaps the mindset of a different kind of human animal.
A story works always as a guiding background so that mental concepts that have already been learnt and digested are not required to be thought about and rediscovered every time they are pertinent to the context. If a certain fruit is found good for eating, then the background stories will reflect that, removing the need for a arduous, repetitive and unproductive assesment every time one finds it. It would seem, to the current mindset, very pertinent to write these stories, making a more or less permanent record that would serve as an unaltered reference for future generations. However, an unwritten story has an ability that surpasses its written counterpart: it is able to evolve. A written story is stagnant. A written story is therefore prone to become sacred and to, with that sacredness, become more important than the context, as it does not remain fixed in what it was originaly meant for.
Stories that are not written but that are trasmitted verbally have exactly that ability to adapt to changing contexts without necessarily losing the inherent knowledge which they were created to preserve. The fruit may now also be good to make juice, not just eating. An unwritten story has the ability to transmute to accomodate this new knowledge without the sacredness of a cumulative script.This is a completely different mindset, one that is now even alien to our context. We really do require written stories if we are to preserve, at least, what truth is not from the attack our minds have been under. We need a record of the lies. Still, they have been writing stories for much longer than we have. They have always dealt with the irrelevance of irrelevant but sacred texts, that override the importance of the context or the people whom were supposed to benefit from whatever knowledge it was supposed to convey. They have even learned a long time ago how to write fiction into the text stories to guide human behavior. We are new at this and we are, I like to think, as pure as our ancestors were once when they were telling relevant stories that would evolve alongside the context without ever writing them down. We are inexperienced and often gullible at it. Additionally, there may even come a time when we will have to throw our records away and face the danger of losing such precious knowledge, lest it become another sacred text and we become them. Now is not the time at all and that is not my point.
They have enhanced their written stories to a higher level. They are now moving pictures with sound: video. They tell us much more than a thousand words and guide us far quicker and more imposingly. It is, up to current times, the most effective method for them to preserve and divulge written sacred stories to guide the behavior of growing numbers of people. There is no need now for them to send a missionary to invest years trying to convert people into whichever story was required for their goals, a simple video clip can do all that in a few minutes or seconds.
Don’t take me wrong, it is not the technology of writing or video making that I’m putting at stake here, it is yet making the question of what we in the future, should there be one free from insanity, will consider worthy of storing. What knowledge will we need that will not be subject to context changes in a natural development of our daily lives together? Will whatever we store from this mind war enable the return of the same insanity we face today?
I have no answer. As I’ve said before:
That’s the true challenge of fakeology – as it is not a mere matter of checking if media events are staged (if the “priests” are telling the truth), it is a matter of slicing reality to eliminate as many untruths as possible. That destroys the cushion-stories. What then? What lies beyond when we have discovered everything truth is not?
What lies beyond is an unknown, as it should be. Absolute security is a false, insane, concept. We will not know how the context will change in this hypothetical sane future… but we might as well reflect upon what we want to bring along with us that may not always be relevant or adequate for whatever context we will find ourselves in.
As I watched Ab’s latest video recommendation, I realised that it would be pertinent to bring these thoughts forward again, after two years have passed us all by. What really moved me was the obvious but overlooked matter of the evil mindset needed to participate actively in the ongoing psyops and fake events, that have a REAL effect on everybody’s life.
«They use the best in us against ourselves» is a tragically cruel quote. Yes, we’d naturally prefer to get by, avoid conflict and respect each other’s boundaries, but only as long as we’re all willing to defend ourselves. In another post I had mentioned the inescapable importance of the warrior figure (archetype even), as being not only the physical guardian of the society he belongs to, but also being the point of reference for his society’s culture. The true warrior IS what he defends, he embodies it, and therefore he is strong, implacable and secure in his defense of its values – against foreign AND domestic enemies. The best way to take down a society’s defenses is to therefore make its warriors lose faith in it, make them doubt its right to continue to exist. No society or culture is ever perfect, of course, so there are always ways to look upon one and find the flaws that can be used to try to convince the warriors among us that it’s not worth protecting. With them losing motivation, the invaders will then bring their fanatics, with sword AND pen, to convince the capitulating warriors of a replacement society to protect – under the disguise of it being in his and his people’s best interests.
The point here is that although on a smaller, natural scale it is essential to be merciful and generous, in order to build the kind of familiar society we, humans, feel comfortable in, on a much larger scale and under the attack we’ve been under, there is no room for the application of those values towards any identified attacker. We, those who are able to feel the difference between good and evil, are humans, they, the willing participants in the attack, are not – regardless of how hard it is for us to admit it. The society that wants to survive must be able to do two things at a given point in their existence:
1) Fight off at least one invasion attempt by a hostile, even if elusive, culture.
2) Keep its core values after the fight is over and won, having therefore not only the flexibility to switch between combat and growth modes effectively, but also true faith in itself.
Only one culture truly accomplished these two goals successfully: the one currently invading us. It fights with determined, even fanatical people, and is able to safeguard their own from harm, ensuring that their values are kept safe.
We however, under the effect of concepts such as “good person” and “peace” have been unable to even put up a proper resistance.In my opinion (because I have learned as much in my own life experience), hope is the enemy of action. Still, the situation isn’t hopeless, we must have warriors still fighting against the invaders and this is where all these revelations come from. It is true that we navigate a sea of fakery to fish out the truths, but the truths are being thrown at us alongside the bombardments of the enemy. The question then is: those warriors who are fighting against the invaders, are they fighting for us, though?
Wow, nice build, from ‘the story’ in and of itself, to an attempt at grasping current reality (good luck!).
The written: The good thing about ‘written’, or really the superiority of the written, which can include scripts written for film/video.. is that thoughts can be thoroughly thought out as opposed to being lost or fuddled in the spontaneity or ‘heat’ of a ‘chat’. Although this is debatable to me now as I write this.. as debate or chat can stimulate unknowns that may provide a leap forward, or a leap some where that writing may not? Anyway many variables therein/herein.. But all communication is good of course; preferably, of some damn substance’ though, right? And, ‘with some truth’, or at least a damn good attempt at it … beyond the pale, of course ..where it hides.
Warriors: “..come out and play” … (had to, it’s the coffee.. i.e., movie reference). Yeah, “warriors” huh! Where? ..You seem to be one … Best wishes.
I think true warriors eventually rise in any given society, may take a few generations! ..Then of course ‘the evil ones’ simultaneously rise to the challenge … are always ready for this, resorting to total hell and devastation as needed (i.e., war).
(Some undeniable oppression helps/knowledge of we are thoroughly kept from through media sorcery and various other methods: the frog in the boiling pot…the frogs offspring more conditioned to the boiling pot, totally oblivious to a beautiful pond their ancestors once knew)
Yeah, seems our warriors are limited to keyboards these days.. ‘Virtuality’. ..S#!ts not even real anymore. One life online and another in reality. If we could see a scoreboard I’d guess the score would be, ‘Us’: 0, ‘Them’: Infinity. ..Hey, this is what we do though, fight the good fight, right? (However we can) I do anyway, and it’s intuitive, spiritual.. don’t need the written for it really*. In fact we here could write better.. than all that I know of available to us/to guide or inspire us anyway … as Jesus’ apostles/followers must have been hacking out in their days, in opposition to the Roman Empire’s evils.. or so the story goes. ..A story no doubt redacted, sent through a blender, edited by Satan.. before being stamped for approval by … ?! – – – The Roman empire! ..of course.
* Children are born with it, happy, content inside from somewhere.. with a healthy fear of everything, they have to be trained to participate in our madness.
* Audio attached to this reply.
Black Dog soundcloud.com/blackdogsongs
Yeah, I am convinced that the written text, being static, has the danger of becoming sacred and disconnected from an evolving reality, context. It also requires a priesthood that dedicates their existence to keeping the original interpretation or meaning of the text, creating “experts”.
Oral tradition as a means to preserve knowledge, on the other hand, requires that each and every one of us is, to some extent a curator and also a story teller. This implies that each of us would have to truly understand the story and its context, making it easy for it to adapt to the evolution of the context. What was useful during a certain period of time and context, may not be so during another. This flexibility allows useful stories and information to be preserved with care, yes, but not as a mouldy, rotting dead relative we used to love and that we’re preserving with a lot of perfume and formaldehyde. The story would then be as alive as we (“we” as in the group which it belongs to) are, it would walk with us, grow with us.
True warriors are those who can understand their people’s stories so profoundly, that they’re willing to not only live by them, but also protect the set of values that accompanies them and therefore defines the society the stories belong to. The advent of the soldier, as opposed to the warrior as I define it, was the cruelest blow to this inner righteous protective instinct we all have.
Nice mix, by the way 🙂
The written capable of (or in danger of) being sacred? Why not (be sacred)? Or rather certain writings/documents (e.g., mine..). To which, amendments can be made as needed to keep them connected to current changing reality (if need be/or reality need not change, if ever ideal!? Or if reality changes for the better from now, then still sacred as lessons or documentation, from the past ).. not sure how oral can suffer any less than written from all the ways our history has? Or whatever story has. The root of the problem is the same as it is for everything else: the higher ups, deliberately setting the course for thousands of years now. Infiltrating all effective movements and their written (i.e., rewritting the script/or inspired documents). All truth is more valuable than gold, written or otherwise.
Recently ‘their’ own constitutions they even transgress … as their true agenda becomes more evident and proportionately more powerful to do such things (‘as it wilt’) and people less powerful and less capable to do anything about it! And how could they? Most people don’t even have a clue as to what’s going on … has always been going on. ‘Ignorance’, mostly due to generations upon generations of baited compromise. Tricked! Most seem easily tricked, and of course, without access to truth about anything, virtually ‘chained to a wall in a dark cave all their life’ how could they not be? ..And these craftsman work over generations. They must be to a point of megalomania by now. ..And we divided, unorganized, isolated, alienated, to say the least; They extremely united with super organization and organizations ..to an extent we can not even fathom ..We, unaware to ‘what’ extent they even conspire … there is probably more of ‘them’ that will read this than any … (I can’t even use the word “us”. What us?).
On a more positive note, I’ve never really attempted to write anything sacred, have you? Maybe we should? Telling it like it really is…if we could ever get enough of it figured out that is. It would be written from a slaves perspective, of course. What slave has ever had such a voice? The here and now slavery we are under must be acknowledged! This new brand, with it’s middle-class buffer (slaves themselves) and all it’s thoroughly programmed adherents, from it’s top super wealthy frontmen to it’s exploited billions, all to willing to please their masters. So dependent on government and corporation, ‘invisible bonds’, slavery nonetheless.
——-
So; Is there any good writings out there? Has the combination of censorship and commercialism left us with everything being total bullshit … and people like us just delivering one failed attempt after the other in trying to explain anything!?
But, you conjecture ‘an evolving reality’ being the problem.. I lean more towards the simple absence of anybody knowing anything beyond what they’ve been allowed to know more the problem. Or the good stuff censored and just not there, ‘unavailable’, ‘no results’, ‘blocked’, ‘banned’.
Anyway, the written should at the least be a good reference, or documentation.. where short of ‘priests’ the reader could decipher. But your case is justified in that, what is ‘current’ seems to be all that I crave currently ..which I can not find, never finding, just accumilating, contemplating, listening, and oh so lacking.. a quagmire really… It seems the more I know the less I feel I know. And; What information out there is not just reactionary to the hidden ones’ puppets?.. With their faux religions, governments, institutions, ideologies and so on? As though a whole element in all this is simply not there! ‘The games we have to play while simultaneously seeing through them.. all the while having to deal with an overwhelming majority of oblvious people, to include the ones closest to us.’
Note: How at the end of the new testament (Christian bible) is some reference to, do not add or take away from this here testament.. which is good and fine except through interpretation it has only helped instill the ‘be all end all’ ethos the fundamentalists adhere so blindly to.. blocking all truths forward (or questioning the accuracy of the bible). Yes, not ‘evolving’. No questioning in the church to this day (or ever), as all and any answers are in ‘the book’.. which conveniently directs it’s readers to ‘trust’ and ‘not question’ their government(s) or leaders. Yes, disconnected!
“Priests” “experts”.. sure, bring them on! We could do no harm.. The word (any word or words true) should not suffer from any such intermediary interpretation but rather the root of the problem has always been from the highest order up (human, I think). We’ve grown so used to our intermediaries being of a detestable nature (a facade; middle/front men who truly are the most programmed) … since time immemorial. How far back do we have to go to when things were real!? Prehistory I guess. Back to a time when you could feel the truth in the ‘wiseman’ or ‘elder’ to with which you were interwoven into the whole experience. Not apart in a pew, or in front of your television (or a computer), or under the power of some ‘authority’, but in the now, with the now.
Note: We are dealing with puppetry. Hundreds and thousands of years of it. As true peoples and cultures have all but been wiped off the face of the earth.
All this romanticism for naught?.. “For what tribe are we now (?) … these failed tribes. ..I surrender my sanity, kill me now! ..It is written, ‘To live is to die’.. or die to live/who can know the difference, who can live this life? Never knowing the truth ..Losing a life for fear of a death.. We snake along this path, hideous creatures we’ve become. Since tribe was lost and commodity we’ve become.” (sorry got off track there with some prose).
Are you describing the internet in your second paragraph? Or are you bitten with a similar bug as I, maybe of a similar astrological leaning? (Libra myself, or “Snake, Dog (9th) moon”)
Astrology does possibly have a bearing on things:
http://www.chinesetools.eu/tools/chinesecalendar/
..or are you simply what one would call a dreamer (as I often am.. when I’m not hating everything). Dream on! Maybe in Antarctica or beyond we could be out of cellphone range and entertain an oral tradition into some utopian future. Otherwise at this point, it seems we’re all screwed! ..But we do have the internet (whoopee!) – ‘unintelligible murmur’.
Yes, ‘The Dreamer’ verses the dark reality and it’s placated millions.
‘Warrior?’ … Where to start?
We need super powers!
Thanks for the reply ArmunnRigh. Sorry if I’m a bit off.. or ‘disconnected’. Which I know I am disconnected as are most of us living in these dark times are.
‘We may be living under dark forces but we do not have to be of or with dark forces any more than necessary. And there is probably coming a time when we will have to say, “No more! I will not be subject to this any further, I draw the line here.”‘
Look how much we have sacrificed already! Dare anyone draw a line?
Black Dog soundcloud.com/blackdogsongs
The written capable of (or in danger of) being sacred? Why not (be sacred)? Or rather certain writings/documents (e.g., mine..). To which, amendments can be made as needed to keep them connected to current changing reality (if need be/or reality need not change, if ever ideal!? Or if reality changes for the better from now, then still sacred as lessons or documentation, from the past ).. not sure how oral can suffer any less than written from all the ways our history has? Or whatever story has. The root of the problem is the same as it is for everything else: the higher ups, deliberately setting the course for thousands of years now. Infiltrating all effective movements and their written (i.e., rewritting the script/or inspired documents). All truth is more valuable than gold, written or otherwise.
My meaning with that is that a written text is dead, it is not life, nor alive, but a dead mimic of something that once lived. If we, however, hold a story (or outright knowledge) as understood, with its ramifications (emotional, psychological, technical, whichever existent), then the story becomes alive, with us being not only its authors, but also its characters.
If we are setting up a theatre play, which is something completed and closed, then we follow the script to the letter, of course. We must, however, treat it only as far its contextual worth. Is that story still contextually relevant? Is it still applicable? We can and should certainly use the “dead texts from the past” as a reference, sure, but not treat them as something as alive as we are – we are organic, the text is not; still, it has been far too easy for a dead text to control organic life, and to even kill it, hasn’t it? What is more sacred, the stagnant texts or the evolving life of the authors? I have thought things as true in the past that I now know to not be so. What if those truths had been “set in stone” and regarded as absolute, sacred? The author would have far surpassed one of its creations and yet, the created stagnant text would still outlive the truly sacred organic life of the author. That is sheer madness, in my opinion. People get too invested in their inorganic truths, to let them go properly and actually value their existence here. That’s what “they” rely on: on the worship of everything that is not actually and truly alive.Recently ‘their’ own constitutions they even transgress … as their true agenda becomes more evident and proportionately more powerful to do such things (‘as it wilt’) and people less powerful and less capable to do anything about it! And how could they? Most people don’t even have a clue as to what’s going on … has always been going on. ‘Ignorance’, mostly due to generations upon generations of baited compromise. Tricked! Most seem easily tricked, and of course, without access to truth about anything, virtually ‘chained to a wall in a dark cave all their life’ how could they not be? ..And these craftsman work over generations. They must be to a point of megalomania by now. ..And we divided, unorganized, isolated, alienated, to say the least; They extremely united with super organization and organizations ..to an extent we can not even fathom ..We, unaware to ‘what’ extent they even conspire … there is probably more of ‘them’ that will read this than any … (I can’t even use the word “us”. What us?).
In my opinion, you are correct in your assessment of the state of “most people”. Ignorance is not, however, absolutely resolved by the mere “absorption” of important reference texts (with which I agree, it is important to have) – in fact, if the root cause of ignorance is not cut off, then more dead information may even worsen the problem in some cases. That root cause is non-life, that is, “truth” surpassing your actual senses, “idea(l)s” surpassing the actual living context of whatever group of people one finds oneself in. That is, in fact, the worst torture, in my view, that is inflicted upon us in the early years of our presence in the world: we are told that whatever we sense or feel, the truth is always an external entity that can never be grasped independently – basically opening the door to becoming prey to parasitism in its many forms.
“They” are united, but “they” are the worst cases of this disease too. They cannot easily retract and go back. We can shift opinions, truths and even our own context to some extent. “They” are servants, benefiting from many a perk for sure, but still far more constrained in their actual “aliveness”, if you can understand the term.
To defeat ignorance you need actual alive teaching, not only (although certainly including as reference) stagnant texts that outlived their authors own truths, in certainly most cases. Do old, sacred texts contain relevant information? Of course they do! Can they show us actual living truth? No, only we, as “storytellers”, authors, can actually do that… usually by cutting off what truth isn’t, chipping away towards an organic revelation.On a more positive note, I’ve never really attempted to write anything sacred, have you? Maybe we should? Telling it like it really is…if we could ever get enough of it figured out that is. It would be written from a slaves perspective, of course. What slave has ever had such a voice? The here and now slavery we are under must be acknowledged! This new brand, with it’s middle-class buffer (slaves themselves) and all it’s thoroughly programmed adherents, from it’s top super wealthy frontmen to it’s exploited billions, all to willing to please their masters. So dependent on government and corporation, ‘invisible bonds’, slavery nonetheless.
We can write “the tale of our plight” and certainly it would help, as a reference, to avoid mistakes in a future where the root of ignorance had been banished from existence. However, if the root cause, the seed of ignorance, is not eradicated, then it would merely become a source for another class of farmers who would realize the perks of serving “the big parasite” to set up the stead and feed on the forcibly ignorant.
So; Is there any good writings out there? Has the combination of censorship and commercialism left us with everything being total bullshit … and people like us just delivering one failed attempt after the other in trying to explain anything!?
But, you conjecture ‘an evolving reality’ being the problem.. I lean more towards the simple absence of anybody knowing anything beyond what they’ve been allowed to know more the problem. Or the good stuff censored and just not there, ‘unavailable’, ‘no results’, ‘blocked’, ‘banned’.
Anyway, the written should at the least be a good reference, or documentation.. where short of ‘priests’ the reader could decipher. But your case is justified in that, what is ‘current’ seems to be all that I crave currently ..which I can not find, never finding, just accumilating, contemplating, listening, and oh so lacking.. a quagmire really… It seems the more I know the less I feel I know. And; What information out there is not just reactionary to the hidden ones’ puppets?.. With their faux religions, governments, institutions, ideologies and so on? As though a whole element in all this is simply not there! ‘The games we have to play while simultaneously seeing through them.. all the while having to deal with an overwhelming majority of oblvious people, to include the ones closest to us.’
Good writing is not a problem, nor is it so an “evolving reality”, that wasn’t my point. Organic life moves through ever changing conditions and contexts, as it is supposed to do. The solution for organic life can never be to force stagnant environments! The environment shapes organic life, exactly because life has that unstoppable, unconscious (as in not needing actual consciousness) urge to be growing whenever possible. Each challenge set by the environment, if overcome, lifts organic life to an even higher degree of existence/experience – but then can a sick unbalanced body accompany a more experienced mind? Of course not, “Mens sana in corpore sano”, hence the absolute necessity and actual reliance upon transvestite medicine – «Diagnose the disease early!», they keep shouting us fearfully, while eating anything but food, expecting us in the torture chambers where they are literally waiting to carve us up for whatever excuse they can come up with.
So, yes, as I’ve said, the texts are an important reference point to the organic, living, mind and body. All the priests, expert scientists, doctors and the like do, wittingly or unwittingly, is to distribute, regurgitated “truth” and apply all measures necessary to maintain what would otherwise be an organic life being, as a mere food source.Note: We are dealing with puppetry. Hundreds and thousands of years of it. As true peoples and cultures have all but been wiped off the face of the earth.
All this romanticism for naught?.. “For what tribe are we now (?) … these failed tribes. ..I surrender my sanity, kill me now! ..It is written, ‘To live is to die’.. or die to live/who can know the difference, who can live this life? Never knowing the truth ..Losing a life for fear of a death.. We snake along this path, hideous creatures we’ve become. Since tribe was lost and commodity we’ve become.” (sorry got off track there with some prose).
Well, as far as we know, all true peoples and cultures have been wiped out, but who tells us that information? Who tells us that we “as a species” are masters of our environment, while at the same time tells us that we are an insignificant speck in the universal dust, while then say that we are relevant enough, after all, to cause the complete and utter death of the place we live in? This absurd “double-speak” may also be applied to hide peoples and cultures existing in places we don’t know about, only because the “Empire” has not been able to reach them… who knows? «If “we” didn’t conquer, it doesn’t exist and if it exists, “we” will conquer it» is the mentality, isn’t it?
We can only go as far as our sphere of influence, but we can certainly preserve and worship life, to the extent of the limitations imposed on us. Life cannot and will never be found in books, even though they can be excellent tools to promote actual life. A knife can be used for murder, a knife can be used to feed – not the knife’s fault, for sure, but the focus of its wielder.Are you describing the internet in your second paragraph? Or are you bitten with a similar bug as I, maybe of a similar astrological leaning? (Libra myself, or “Snake, Dog (9th) moon”)
Astrology does possibly have a bearing on things:
No, not the internet, but a possible organic living way of storing and using knowledge.
Note: Pisces in my case.
..or are you simply what one would call a dreamer (as I often am.. when I’m not hating everything). Dream on! Maybe in Antarctica or beyond we could be out of cellphone range and entertain an oral tradition into some utopian future. Otherwise at this point, it seems we’re all screwed! ..But we do have the internet (whoopee!) – ‘unintelligible murmur’.
Yes, ‘The Dreamer’ verses the dark reality and it’s placated millions.
‘Warrior?’ … Where to start?
We need super powers!
I don’t know if “dreamer” would apply. I observe that the world will change, but change to what? The “Empire” has had so many faces why wouldn’t it be able to change to another? I guess it all depends on those who will actually build the “new world” – will they carry with them the parasite? Will they have the mental seed to rebuild the farm again? If not, then I think that organic life is the only possible consequence. Don’t you find it funny and ironic, for instance, that we are using inorganic life (computer, internet, electrical power, etc) to discuss organic life?
A warrior, in the sense of how I see it, is a safe-keeper of the living values of a culture, of a people, of a tribe. These values are never “set in stone” and sacred, but still sacred in the way they can be applied to the actual organic life of the people. The warrior fights in their defense, because he embodies what he defends – he is the tribe, therefore his fight is one of sheer survival.
Thanks for the reply ArmunnRigh. Sorry if I’m a bit off.. or ‘disconnected’. Which I know I am disconnected as are most of us living in these dark times are.
‘We may be living under dark forces but we do not have to be of or with dark forces any more than necessary. And there is probably coming a time when we will have to say, “No more! I will not be subject to this any further, I draw the line here.”‘
Look how much we have sacrificed already! Dare anyone draw a line?
“We must realize how dumb we are to get anywhere ..So much we have to throw out. They contest and rule us with lies. Truth is the only light one should ever follow.” – Black Dog (Jan. 17, 2016)
And thank you for keeping the discussion alive as well. If the time comes, one need only to make sure of one’s motivations. There will be certainly false scenarios for the pressure to be eased, as easily as opening a steam valve… but I guess those who should will know the difference.
You are quite right in your own quote: only by the realization of our ignorant state and of the root cause for that ignorance, will one be able to chip away through the false to discern what truth might be like.
The Big Parasite … the big cheese, illuminati.. high orders of the masons, jesuits, jews, muslims, christians, luciferians, satanists.. and so on.. like Carlin said, one big party and you’re not invited!
ArmunnRigh wrote: “Don’t you find it funny and ironic, for instance, that we are using inorganic life (computer, internet, electrical power, etc) to discuss organic life?”
Yes, I miss life, nature.. and people. This electronic secondary existence is getting insane, we need to push it to a head or realize how it’s dead and then question WTF we are doing? Previous to the internet I had the occassional book but since the internet, yes, ironically I realize how these books available are questionable as well.. although not creating EMF’s and whatever health dangers and other surveilance dangers these electronics may be.
Another conundrum.. the pros and cons of this.
‘We’ll let you find all the answers.. as we build a cage all around you.. you’ll know but it will be irrelevant as we tag you and simultaneously reduce your reality to absurd stories no one will believe..’ like airplanes saturating the sky with cloud-like substances.. too big to consider, I guess, as people go about their debt slave existences oblivious to anything else, under total man-made delusions.
– S – O – S –
Not sure what the story is, but I know there’s a story here somewhere.. something about a spell we’re all under. ..And as you have conjected with this post here, words alone may not break this spell … and electronic words maybe even less so. So how does one break this spell?
When I was younger, I think knowing less, I knew more.
You are correct, It must be alive, in the now, organic. A love letter in and of itself will not win a heart. Thanks for the post and replies though.. to at least know someone is alive and human out there. Greetings, from this virtual space capsule lost in space (and now time)… floating seemingly endlessly in a sea of what appears to be nothing. And I, content to receive the slightest transmission.. a beep … a hello from any kind stranger.
“Hello, yes I am encapsulated floating elsewhere as well, there are many of us, each to our own capsule, apart, we do not know where we are or where we are going but we are glad to hear from you …”
—
ArmunnRigh wrote: “..can a sick unbalanced body accompany a more experienced mind? Of course not, “Mens sana in corpore sano”, hence the absolute necessity and actual reliance upon transvestite medicine – «Diagnose the disease early!», they keep shouting us fearfully, while eating anything but food, expecting us in the torture chambers where they are literally waiting to carve us up for whatever excuse they can come up with.”
Understood from above: Yes! Dare anyone trust any institution! It may take your life and underlyingly may be intentionally malevolent. In all manner of deceit. Keep your health as much as possible! Pay more now for good food or pay later! Read: Good Calorie, Bad Calorie by Gary Taubes.
Not understood from above: “Mens sana in corpore sano” and the term “transvestite medicine”. I’m guessing the latin looking phrase is reaffirmation of the rest of the paragraph and ‘transvestite medicine’ is synonymous or derogatory of ‘mainstream’ medicine? – Although transvestite refers to sex/gender in my dictionary/culture:
“trans·ves·tite n
somebody who dresses like opposite sex: somebody who adopts the dress and often the behavior of the opposite sex
[Early 20th century. < German Transvestit “cross-dresser” < Latin vestire “clothe, dress” (see vest)]”So I’ll guess, in your culture transvestite has a broader meaning/context which can include any circumstance opposite of what it appears. Such as a malevolent ‘dark’ institution, not the least bit interested in what’s best for everyone.. dressing it’s corporatized well paid unquestioning brainwashed dupes up in costumes puppeting them as benevolent do-gooders out for everyone’s best interest!
—
http://www.chinesetools.eu/tools/chinesecalendar/
Pisces:
Is your birthdate in the second month (“2”) of your Chinese year from the calendar linked above? And what’s your Chinese year? Or if that’s too personal I understand.. A little whack hobby I indulge, that sure seems to carry some weight. Twelve signs, one’s self (1) with opposite (6), semi-opposites (3 and 9) and like kinds (4 and 8); add your moon sign and it goes deeper. Second moon of a Chinese year would be Pisces which correlates to the Rabbit per Chinese, a.k.a. ‘The Cat’ in some asian references. I don’t go much deeper than that … but if you know your birth time as well, it’s just one click on the internet to find out what your western signs are … sun, moon, planets? I am Gemini rising, Libra sun and mercury, and Scorpio moon, venus, mars and neptune … bizzare, I know … who knows what that means/what’s out there/up there/and how that may be effecting us and things..
Black Dog soundcloud.com/blackdogsongs
The Big Parasite … the big cheese, illuminati.. high orders of the masons, jesuits, jews, muslims, christians, luciferians, satanists.. and so on.. like Carlin said, one big party and you’re not invited!
Parasitism is the orgy we’ve been feeding. On one level, one such as the Marquis de Sade described in his “120 days of Sodom”, in which a Duke, a Bishop, a Judge and a Banker lock themselves up for five months in a castle with prostitutes and members of the “plebe”, to abuse and torture for pleasure and vitality. On another level, there’s the unseen parasite, the one lurking in the back of the mind of Man, feeding upon the emotions itself cannot feel, due to its inorganic state.
ArmunnRigh wrote: “Don’t you find it funny and ironic, for instance, that we are using inorganic life (computer, internet, electrical power, etc) to discuss organic life?”
Yes, I miss life, nature.. and people. This electronic secondary existence is getting insane, we need to push it to a head or realize how it’s dead and then question WTF we are doing? Previous to the internet I had the occassional book but since the internet, yes, ironically I realize how these books available are questionable as well.. although not creating EMF’s and whatever health dangers and other surveilance dangers these electronics may be.
Another conundrum.. the pros and cons of this.
Yes, there is nothing like direct contact. That’s where the world religion comes from, from the Latin “religare” to reconnect – to what? Well life is a good start, be surrounded by life and lie still. Going back to enjoying the simple things, isn’t it? A bird, the wind, a tree with all the life that goes on in it. I find that you can enjoy much more of both worlds if you are able to go between one (the natural) and the other (the electronic) at will. The most interesting, I find, is that people are actually far more open and sincere behind the anonymity of an avatar, username and keyboard, once you actually reach out as a human contact.
‘We’ll let you find all the answers.. as we build a cage all around you.. you’ll know but it will be irrelevant as we tag you and simultaneously reduce your reality to absurd stories no one will believe..’ like airplanes saturating the sky with cloud-like substances.. too big to consider, I guess, as people go about their debt slave existences oblivious to anything else, under total man-made delusions.
– S – O – S –
Years ago, I would probably talk to you about hope. Now? No. I realised personally how hope is the deepest harness. I didn’t know, but Wanda told me one of these days that when Prometheus opened Pandora’s box, in the myth, the last thing to remain in the box, after all the evil and pestilence came out, was… hope. Hope was lurking stagnant among evil – a friend to it? A companion? A partner? Hope often allows evil, because it doesn’t allow for “personal deaths”, the letting go of the obsolete, the allowing for our own change. Hope prevents that in most cases.
I don’t know if there’s an English equivalent, but in Portuguese, we have a saying that translates more or less like this:«When you’re drowning, it is often best not to struggle and allow yourself to reach the bottom, to then kick it and then be able to come back up.»
Not sure what the story is, but I know there’s a story here somewhere.. something about a spell we’re all under. ..And as you have conjected with this post here, words alone may not break this spell … and electronic words maybe even less so. So how does one break this spell?
When I was younger, I think knowing less, I knew more.
Precisely! The story, what is it? Aren’t we writing it as well? 😉
Unwittingly, we are the pens the storytellers use to write the story so far… will it have a grand finale or will it be a boring anti-climax? I guess the ink could run dry as well…You are correct, It must be alive, in the now, organic. A love letter in and of itself will not win a heart. Thanks for the post and replies though.. to at least know someone is alive and human out there. Greetings, from this virtual space capsule lost in space (and now time)… floating seemingly endlessly in a sea of what appears to be nothing. And I, content to receive the slightest transmission.. a beep … a hello from any kind stranger.
“Hello, yes I am encapsulated floating elsewhere as well, there are many of us, each to our own capsule, apart, we do not know where we are or where we are going but we are glad to hear from you …”
Isn’t that a lonely imagery sold by NASA and their predecessors? We all live in a lonely capsule, adrift in the cold darkness of space… but is that truly where we live? Is that truly the nature of our existence or merely the setting for their story to be played out?
I think transmissions are received as they are sent, man; send them honestly and authentically and you get it likewise. Greetings indeed, but not from a lonely undead torture chamber, but from a living being living in a living world!—
ArmunnRigh wrote: “..can a sick unbalanced body accompany a more experienced mind? Of course not, “Mens sana in corpore sano”, hence the absolute necessity and actual reliance upon transvestite medicine – «Diagnose the disease early!», they keep shouting us fearfully, while eating anything but food, expecting us in the torture chambers where they are literally waiting to carve us up for whatever excuse they can come up with.”
Understood from above: Yes! Dare anyone trust any institution! It may take your life and underlyingly may be intentionally malevolent. In all manner of deceit. Keep your health as much as possible! Pay more now for good food or pay later! Read: Good Calorie, Bad Calorie by Gary Taubes.
Not understood from above: “Mens sana in corpore sano” and the term “transvestite medicine”. I’m guessing the latin looking phrase is reaffirmation of the rest of the paragraph and ‘transvestite medicine’ is synonymous or derogatory of ‘mainstream’ medicine? – Although transvestite refers to sex/gender in my dictionary/culture:
“trans·ves·tite n
somebody who dresses like opposite sex: somebody who adopts the dress and often the behavior of the opposite sex
[Early 20th century. < German Transvestit “cross-dresser” < Latin vestire “clothe, dress” (see vest)]”So I’ll guess, in your culture transvestite has a broader meaning/context which can include any circumstance opposite of what it appears. Such as a malevolent ‘dark’ institution, not the least bit interested in what’s best for everyone.. dressing it’s corporatized well paid unquestioning brainwashed dupes up in costumes puppeting them as benevolent do-gooders out for everyone’s best interest!
“Mens sana in corpore sano”, means “Sane mind in a sane body”. It is from a poem by a Roman poet named Juvenal:
« You should pray for a healthy mind in a healthy body.
Ask for a stout heart that has no fear of death,
and deems length of days the least of Nature’s gifts
that can endure any kind of toil,
that knows neither wrath nor desire and thinks
the woes and hard labors of Hercules better than
the loves and banquets and downy cushions of Sardanapalus.
What I commend to you, you can give to yourself;
For assuredly, the only road to a life of peace is virtue. »🙂
—
http://www.chinesetools.eu/tools/chinesecalendar/
Pisces:
Is your birthdate in the second month (“2”) of your Chinese year from the calendar linked above? And what’s your Chinese year? Or if that’s too personal I understand.. A little whack hobby I indulge, that sure seems to carry some weight. Twelve signs, one’s self (1) with opposite (6), semi-opposites (3 and 9) and like kinds (4 and 8); add your moon sign and it goes deeper. Second moon of a Chinese year would be Pisces which correlates to the Rabbit per Chinese, a.k.a. ‘The Cat’ in some asian references. I don’t go much deeper than that … but if you know your birth time as well, it’s just one click on the internet to find out what your western signs are … sun, moon, planets? I am Gemini rising, Libra sun and mercury, and Scorpio moon, venus, mars and neptune … bizzare, I know … who knows what that means/what’s out there/up there/and how that may be effecting us and things..
I have dabbled in “western” astrology before and know my planet positions, yes. I don’t pay much attention recently. Never checked Chinese astrology, though.
Oh and I realised I forgot to address your doubt about the usage of the word “transvestite”. Yes, in Portuguese, “travesti” is used also to described something disguised as something else that is opposite, so not only used in the context of gender.
Talking about stories, Armunn, have you come across the claims made by the new chronologists who dispute the contents and dating of events narrated in our history books?
When we speak of Romulus and Remus, are we speaking of flesh and blood people? Does this statue make them seem more or less real? Was the statue made in the time officially quoted or was it made later? is it a fake? What is a fake? Does it matter? Who cares? Are Romulus and Remus real platonically? Is that the only reality that matters? Can we really grasp anything abstract outside of a narrative?Whatever reality is, it's not that.
Talking about stories, Armunn, have you come across the claims made by the new chronologists who dispute the contents and dating of events narrated in our history books?
When we speak of Romulus and Remus, are we speaking of flesh and blood people? Does this statue make them seem more or less real? Was the statue made in the time officially quoted or was it made later? is it a fake? What is a fake? Does it matter? Who cares? Are Romulus and Remus real platonically? Is that the only reality that matters? Can we really grasp anything abstract outside of a narrative?I have skimmed through those claims, but never really dug into them. I wouldn’t be surprised if such claims were verifiable, given the rest of the modus operandi.
As to your other question, group stories mustn’t be confused with History. History is factual, it is a mere dead record of what happened and should only be corrected with incontestable proof of mistakes. Stories are fables, or myths, that instead of being recorded in a stale format, are adaptive to the life of the group it belongs to. For that particular example, Romulus and Remus are each and every Roman, because they are supposed to determine the initial core values of “Romanhood”. That is why we should carefully choose our myths: we live them through, because we give them actors and a stage.
I guess it all depends on the difference between history and records Of history – but we know all about that at this site;-)
Miles Mathis lays it all out in his inimitable style:
History is the autobiography of a dude named Victor – but reality still exists. The question is where!
Whatever reality is, it's not that.
I guess it all depends on the difference between history and records Of history – but we know all about that at this site;-)
Miles Mathis lays it all out in his inimitable style:
http://mileswmathis.com/history.pdfHistory is the autobiography of a dude named Victor – but reality still exists. The question is where!
Quite right, Madam Thomas! Quite right. Hence the focus and effort applied on grabbing the reins of History: to control it is to shape the reference points for the stories (fables, myths). It is using a perfectly fine tool of humanity against itself, heh?
I will certainly read that article. You have sparked my interest.
Hence the focus and effort applied on grabbing the reins of History: to control it is to shape the reference points for the stories (fables, myths).
Or could it be the other way round? The stories (fables, myths) shape the reference points for history?
We’ll have to thrash it out on an audio-chat, me-thinks:-)
Whatever reality is, it's not that.
Or could it be the other way round? The stories (fables, myths) shape the reference points for history?
We’ll have to thrash it out on an audio-chat, me-thinks:-)
Ah, the chicken and egg dilemma. Which comes first?
I am unsure an audiochat would be wise – I feel there are trolls about! No, not kidding, trolls!
But if we made that audiochat into a ROUND table type of conversation… hmmm… that might catch the trolls on the back foot (or is it FLAT foot?)
I wonder…
ArmunnRigh wrote: “On another level, there’s the unseen parasite, the one lurking in the back of the mind of Man, feeding upon the emotions itself cannot feel, due to its inorganic state.”
I find the above inconceivable, cryptic; foggy, yet interesting. Can you rewrite this in a more user friendly version; I could elaborate on it but it would be lengthy, something about the dualism (or division of a sort) between us and our minds.. opening up a whole other can of worms though. To which I don’t think anyone deserves…I think too much is aimed at the individual as the problem: i.e., the sinner, the conspiracy theororist, weirdo, non-conformist, and so on. Although, ‘the mind’ does remain on trial, or suspect, in all cases ..my case!? Ha.
ArmunnRigh wrote: “The most interesting, I find, is that people are actually far more open and sincere [than] behind the anonymity of an avatar, username and keyboard, once you actually reach out as a human contact.”
Yes, possibly, but personally I feel they are affected nonetheless.. affected by all this new stuff, changed, changing, and not for the better. But.. like a spell, ‘breakable’, and I, although aware, am under the spell myself … ..can only remember better times.
No doubt, this is just another layer of the agenda being deliberately conceived and deployed on us.. this disappearing of reality and manifesting of virtuality. ‘Devoid of nature’, or if and when one is able to access nature they are alone in it, or ‘just visiting’. As all human attention goes to the unnatural … So, one all too often finds oneself far removed from nature … And is then given (by the controllers) happy treats to pacify one’s depression/sadness, and one should be distraught devoid of nature! Animals in a zoo know what we don’t … that they are in a zoo! As well, animals in the wild know what we don’t … freedom.
Black Dog soundcloud.com/blackdogsongs
ArmunnRigh wrote: “On another level, there’s the unseen parasite, the one lurking in the back of the mind of Man, feeding upon the emotions itself cannot feel, due to its inorganic state.”
I find the above inconceivable, cryptic; foggy, yet interesting. Can you rewrite this in a more user friendly version; I could elaborate on it but it would be lengthy, something about the dualism (or division of a sort) between us and our minds.. opening up a whole other can of worms though. To which I don’t think anyone deserves…I think too much is aimed at the individual as the problem: i.e., the sinner, the conspiracy theororist, weirdo, non-conformist, and so on. Although, ‘the mind’ does remain on trial, or suspect, in all cases ..my case!? Ha.
Far better than my thousand words is perhaps to watch this scene (pay no mind to the title and description the uploader gave it, the ego takes much of the heat for what is not entirely its “fault”):
ArmunnRigh wrote: “The most interesting, I find, is that people are actually far more open and sincere [than] behind the anonymity of an avatar, username and keyboard, once you actually reach out as a human contact.”
Yes, possibly, but personally I feel they are affected nonetheless.. affected by all this new stuff, changed, changing, and not for the better. But.. like a spell, ‘breakable’, and I, although aware, am under the spell myself … ..can only remember better times.
You have included the [than] to my original sentence which changed the meaning I intended. I was trying to say that one you try to reach out to a “username”, the mask which has a real person behind it, that the response you will get, for better or worse, is far more human than in your daily contacts with people passing by on the street, or even your circle of acquaintances.
Certainly affected, as you very well point out, but in comparison, more human. This is only a natural reaction to the inexplicable (to themselves) sense of unease people have nowadays in the outside world. The “username” mask allows them to show a bit more of their real faces and behaviors, while the “real world persona” mask forces them to follow a predetermined set of normality behaviors and an “acceptable” face.No doubt, this is just another layer of the agenda being deliberately conceived and deployed on us.. this disappearing of reality and manifesting of virtuality. ‘Devoid of nature’, or if and when one is able to access nature they are alone in it, or ‘just visiting’. As all human attention goes to the unnatural … So, one all too often finds oneself far removed from nature … And is then given (by the controllers) happy treats to pacify one’s depression/sadness, and one should be distraught devoid of nature! Animals in a zoo know what we don’t … that they are in a zoo! As well, animals in the wild know what we don’t … freedom.
You are surely right on one level, but consider also that were it not for computers, internet and the like, we wouldn’t be having this exchange and, certainly, only very few of us would have been alerted to the issues of true evil, would we? At most you had preachers trying to convince you to a pact with one of the wide selection of names for the great demon-parasite – convinced of doing good, we would be merely another clueless victim. We are cut off from nature, yes, but the virtual world gives the ready the knowledge and therefore the choice (and choice is a step closer to freedom). Otherwise, only a very few of us would even know they’re cut off from nature at this point.
Evil isn’t the only force on the field, that much seems certain.
I guess it all depends on the difference between history and records Of history – but we know all about that at this site;-)
Miles Mathis lays it all out in his inimitable style:
http://mileswmathis.com/history.pdfHistory is the autobiography of a dude named Victor – but reality still exists. The question is where!
I have now just read the short article you had sent.
I have nothing to disagree with Miles Mathis’ presentation, naturally, but I think he only fails to address the obvious question of how do people get to what actually happened, since they cannot go back and watch it happen again and have to, at the most, seep through the actual records for discrepancies.
So, there again, it can be seen that the actual path that lays ahead of us (in fact, it is the path we have been already walking on) is to find what truth must be from what truth can’t be, regardless of our preferences or comforts. Or as I’ve put it in the original post:
That’s the true challenge of fakeology – as it is not a mere matter of checking if media events are staged (if the “priests” are telling the truth), it is a matter of slicing reality to eliminate as many untruths as possible. That destroys the cushion-stories. What then? What lies beyond when we have discovered everything truth is not?
it is a matter of slicing reality to eliminate as many untruths as possible.
Imagine you had the most credible, intelligent, well-meaning person in the world tell you something about what happened the previous day. I am talking about someone you personally trust.
Would you believe him?
Consider the following scenarios:
A loving father tells his daughter that Santa brought the presents under the Christmas tree.
A wife gives her husband a full description of a bankrobber, but the CCTV footage clearly shows she was mistaken. Her memory had played tricks with her due to careless and suggestive questioning by an inexperienced police officer.
Your friend studies history and writes a history book on the history of Portugal. he fact checks everything but his manuscript gets shortened by the editor and with it the subtelties of his narrative are lost. Before he can explain this turn of events to you, he dies in a car accident. You take his account as the gold standard because you don’t know what was left on the cutting floor.
….
It seems to me to be problematic to establish the “reality” of any past events beyond the “knowing” that something must have happened.
…
What is your philosophical stance on epistemology, Armunn? I now consider myself philosophically an idealist ( not like Berkeley) and see fakeology as a pathway towards this view of the world.Whatever reality is, it's not that.
In case the video in the post above can’t be seen normally, due to country restrictions, try through this link.
Imagine you had the most credible, intelligent, well-meaning person in the world tell you something about what happened the previous day. I am talking about someone you personally trust.
Would you believe him?
Consider the following scenarios:
A loving father tells his daughter that Santa brought the presents under the Christmas tree.
A wife gives her husband a full description of a bankrobber, but the CCTV footage clearly shows she was mistaken. Her memory had played tricks with her due to careless and suggestive questioning by an inexperienced police officer.
Your friend studies history and writes a history book on the history of Portugal. he fact checks everything but his manuscript gets shortened by the editor and with it the subtelties of his narrative are lost. Before he can explain this turn of events to you, he dies in a car accident. You take his account as the gold standard because you don’t know what was left on the cutting floor.
….
It seems to me to be problematic to establish the “reality” of any past events beyond the “knowing” that something must have happened.I agree with your doubts and conclusion above and can’t really understand the intended connection with my quote, I’m afraid. When I wrote «it is a matter of slicing reality to eliminate as many untruths as possible.», I included in the understanding of “untruth” any events that may be used as a foundation for whatever assertion. It is not limited, in my opinion at least, to the results of falsehood, but also to the causes.
…
What is your philosophical stance on epistemology, Armunn? I now consider myself philosophically an idealist ( not like Berkeley) and see fakeology as a pathway towards this view of the world.Well, I do realize the utmost importance of understanding idealism, of course – therefore the importance I attribute (and think is evident) to stories for the human existence. I do also consider, however, that there is a tangible and concrete existence outside the human realm that influences it and affects it. We exist before culture, ideas, thoughts… even before a notion of “I”… so does the world, whatever it is. The world needs no observers, no “experiencers” to exist, but it may exist for us to experience (that is a different matter altogether).
In summary, the unimaginable “void” that remains after one has invalidated and removed all that is not true, is the truth. Why do I say void? Exactly due to the adjective unimaginable – in human experience it is unimaginable, so it seems empty, because it seems we can only experience satisfactorily in our present state of life that which stands on falsehood. We are suffering from a collective madness, are we not? Look at the reality we help create.
Still, truth does exists to be found, I think.
How do we recognize what is unimaginable? Ah, but hasn’t truth evaded us a myriad of times before, in those moments of pure silence we tend to end so crushingly? We can’t imagine it, so we usually just keep chasing our own tails: a tendency those who enslave us use very well for their ends.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.