Uncle Fetzer in the Virtual Reality

[elbuggo]

Is there anything here in his latest comment that is believable or correct at all? What is that? Is he here also deliberately protecting medias complicity in this 911 operation?

Jim FetzerApril 6, 2014 at 4:23 PM

obf regularly repeats claims that I have long since refuted. We know the origin of most of the photos and films of 9/11 and verify their origins for yourself.

The photos and films are taken from many locations and perspectives, some from New Jersey, others from helicopters. They all hang together the right way to be authentic images of the same enduring event.

We have them present; then they are gone–in about 10 seconds apiece. Now there are enormous clouds of very find dust, not previously present, where the Twin
Towers were largely converted into millions of cubic yards of very find dust.

The USGS dust samples confirm that this was a nuclear event. ofb offers the bizarre suggestion that neither the videos nor the dust samples can be trusted, even though the contradict the official account.

He has no idea what happened on 9/11 and would have us discard some of the most important evidence on the ground that they are faked (for which he offers no evidence at all) or came from the government.

Why in the world would anyone fake videos that show the official account of their collapse cannot be correct? And why fake dust samples that prove it was a nuclear event? This is convoluted thinking from a man who does not deserve to be taken seriously.

http://radiofetzer.blogspot.no/2014/03/fs-from-eu.html

Again, he is creating a sheep cyclone – will waste time and energy and never get anywhere:

[Author]

Posts