Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yes, Johnny, he’s just a character in a script.
To unite the whole world’s population under the mission of humanity exploring the universe, together, in harmony (Star Trek plot) or to unite the whole world’s population against an outisde threat, like an alien invasion (War of the Worlds plot).
He’s a character in the first, but we may well see these characters going towards the second one and mixing elements.
Hi Armun,<br>
‘fraid I don’t have any personal contact to totalrecall- just love his site because of its well-presented content. But you’ve inspired me to go right over there now and ask him.<br>
Btw it was a joy to listen to the last RAW. You and Ana and the other participants, as well as the amazing Ab, have made such a difference to my life (thank you Ab!).Yes, maybe you can also try to contact him in the other forum you mentioned 🙂
Thank you for your words! It’s always a great feeling to realize we’re not alone.
I know Ab is looking to get a hold of this Wild Heretic author for a show. Maybe you can help him get through to him, Carole?
For my part, JohnnyClues, it’s quite all right and just a misunderstanding that I won’t give another thought about. I’m glad we got to clarify where we stand over skype.
Fruitful discussion is a powerful weapon to have on our side!
Ah yes, Blue Moon, the Argentina theory.
I think of it more as a distraction, as I would see a “deserted” island in the Pacific as much more isolated and therefore suitable spot, but it does seem that South America served as a haven, even if temporary, to many of the actors of recent history.
Oh, I see what you mean.
He would have doubles, maybe some even easily detectable, to give the impression of real power from the actor / character to his more immediate circles. Yes, I see and it makes sense.
Unless he really did something wrong that would betray “the plan”, I don’t think he even died. It wouldn’t be much of an incentive compared to spending the rest of your life drinking piñacoladas 😛
i’m not concerned about revealing fakery or proving a particular event is faked. it happens everyday, apparently everywhere. to me, it is a fact of life.
i already know it exists: but just how prevalent is it? i rely, in part, on signatures like occultic numbers to help me answer that question. i don’t have time to develop a case for an evidentiary hearing. instead, i’ll listen to karl rove. i won’t study their reality “judiciously, as you will”; i’ll go ahead and take advantage of our “history’s actors” pride by recognizing their silly signatures.
Yeah, I see your point. In my case, I already know the signatures will be there in every fakery so I’d prefer to identify the psyops themselves – even to extrapolate on the intent behind them – while in your case, smj, you prefer to identify the signatures in the fakery that was already revealed as such.
It seems quite positive, as the differences in personality and vocation between the members are the most valuable resource of any society. In the end, both will lead to the same end and enrich the research.
I did not intend, and I really hope he didn’t take it that way (again the ambiguity of text over a more personal contact), to discourage JohnnyClues from his research. Honestly I did want to see if I could understand the numbers being shown – as I had tried many times earlier from other authors on other presentations and at least partially failed to.
Still, asking questions and discussing seems to be the point of a forum, as it checks and rechecks the work and promotes a better understanding of the aspects that make up the overall picture.Whoa, Johnny, in text messaging, like forum posts, there is no tone of voice much less facial expression, so it is ambiguous as to intent, but that’s a pretty intense response from you. No need to be so apologetic.
Damn, as far as I’m concerned, you should have heard or read my thoughts when I was intensely into something like a bloodhound!
My question was truly honest “want-to-know” as I really don’t know much about numerology. I do know that in numerology adding numbers is part of the process (like determining one’s number by adding the number values of one’s name letters, for example), but still I do get the impression it overcomplicates things to determine whether a story is fake through number analysis. What may also do is to entangle oneself into an abstract web that can never be factually proven. Yes, numbers are a big thing for them. Yes, they love to use them. Yes, you may even be spot on at your analysis. Is their existence alone something that factually proves that a news piece is fake? No.
An alternative to numerology analysis, which is too much time and energy consumming without producing proof of enough quality, would be to analyse the story itself. What are the facts being told? Let’s enumerate them. What are the places they took place in? Can we get maps or blueprints of these places to, for example, determine where terminal 1, 2 and 3 are located? Where in the building did the police enter? Where exactly was the shooter according to the story? Etc.
One simple way to reveal a fakery without requiring the energy draining numbers crunching is for example:
To me, this kind of simple analysis is far more productive than numerology – even if one’s analysis is right. Why? Because we already know the perpetrator so all that needs to be done is to find contradictions or holes in the story to reveal a fakery. We don’t need to get exhausted finding their signature.
And by all means, Johnny, it is very possible that they hide these numbers in these things although I think the scriptwriters are not “that far into the cult” and really not very creative, it’s just that I think there are easier and more productive ways to determine “guilt” other than to waste our energies and resources into numerology – unless it’s not energy draining for you and it’s actually uplifting.
I’m not smarter than any of the people here – I too went and may still fall into dead-end rabbit holes, but I’m just more conservative when choosing where to apply my energy and time.
BTW, I added you now on skype, so feel free to chat there as well, should you want!
The real powers are NEVER seen- That is the oldest axiom in the political playbook
Absolutely true, but Hitler was never part of the real powers, so there would be no reason to have several actors for the same character – it would introduce too many unpredictable elements. Still, I don’t have enough details to agree or disagree, so can you present more on this proposal?
I can’t find a powered gyroscope to prove earth doesn’t rotate.
Would you elaborate?
JUNO – A Very Occultic Journey
Juno was launched on August 5, 2011, on a five-year cruise to Jupiter, arriving around July 4, 2016. The spacecraft will orbit Jupiter 33 times during one Earth year.
In August 2016, the spacecraft will perform an orbit insertion burn to slow the spacecraft enough to allow capture into an 11day polar orbit.
The Juno mission is set to conclude in October 2017, after completing 33 orbits around Jupiter, when the probe will be de-orbited to crash into Jupiter so as to avoid any possibility of it impacting its moons.
Launch timeline
Juno’s interplanetary trajectory; tick marks at 30-day intervals.<br>
The Atlas V (AV-029) Russian-designed RD-180 main engine, powered by kerosene and liquid oxygen, was started and underwent checkout 3.8 seconds prior to the ignition of five strap-on solid rocket boosters (SRBs).Following SRB burnout, approximately 1 minute 33 seconds into the flight, two of the spent boosters fell away from the vehicle followed 1.5 seconds later by the remaining three. When heating levels had dropped below predetermined limits, the payload fairing that protected Juno during transit through the thickest part of the atmosphere separated, about 3 minutes 24 seconds into the flight.
The Atlas V main engine cut off 4 minutes 26 seconds after liftoff. 16 seconds later, the Centaur second stage ignited and burned for approximately 6 minutes, putting the satellite into an initial parking orbit.
The vehicle coasted for approximately 30 minutes, and then the Centaur was re-ignited for a second firing of 9 minutes, putting the spacecraft on an Earth escape trajectory.
Prior to separation the Centaur stage used onboard reaction engines to spin Juno up to 1.4 RPM. About 54 minutes after launch, the spacecraft separated from the Centaur and began to extend its solar panels.
Following the full deployment and locking of the solar panels, Juno’s batteries began to recharge. Successful deployment of the solar panels reduced Juno’s spin rate by two-thirds. The probe is spun to ensure stability during the voyage and so that all instruments on the probe are able to observe Jupiter.
The $1.1 billion Juno mission
Both this and your previous Juno video reveal with simplicity and clarity their usage of numbers and also other mythological concepts important to their cultish mindset. This is the simplicity I talk about. Ok, granted, it will not always be this clear-cut, but I can’t imagine it being so complexly hidden as presented in the 30+ part video posted by Ab earlier this week.
Although this is a crystal clear fakery, absolutely evident, can you please explain your highlighted numbers in the article images? At least an overview.
I have watched, like mentioned on the raw call, the full length numerology video, but can’t help to think that it makes it too complicated even for the scriptwriters who are, in my opinion, no smarter than your average tax collector.
So, if you could, Johnny, please just explain succintly the numbers highlighted I would much appreciate it.
Note that I’m pretty sure that the usage of numbers that are sacred to them exist in these psyops, and also certainly in a sequence that makes sense to ther cult, but I doubt that they would hide the numbers in complicated formulas with additions and subtractions.
Thanks!
You must be logged in to post a comment.