[Herge Degrelle]

@”That’s really impressive research imo. I just ignore the crap about mini nukes and other fantasies like that in that documentary. The part about stabilizing the live 9/11 video causing the movement of the “plane” to become jittery is really hardcore evidence if Ace Baker did the analysis correctly. It’s impossible that it’s a real plane in the live 9/11 video from the news helicopter.”

“Impressive” does not mean accurate and hardly any research he did was original, just plagiarized from Simon Shack and made much more flashy by spending money on production. You could say his directorial skills are good but that’s about it and to the purpose of outright gatekeeping. Collin “Ace” claims the whole thing was done during the 17 second delay co-ordinationed with a “Live” helicopter shot of the buildings and hence the “nose-out.” This is completely unnecessary and a risk not even worth taking for the sake of having a “live” event, since they know they have such control of not only the media but also the intelligence agencies and the judges and courts that no one could bust them on a previously manufactured film shown as “live” that wasn’t really live.

Therefore, since doing a “mission impossible” operation is completely unnecessary, it follows that they have put the “nose-out” shot in there ON PURPOSE as a rabbit trail for people to chase. Simon Shack and a few other No-Planers were honest chasers of this trail, Ace Baker is certainly NOT, he came in to lead the chase into a dead end or at least put a significant number of chasers off the scent of non-plane fakery and the VicSims information. I know because I was one of those chasers he kept off the non-plane fakery and VicSims trail for a good year or so. The proof for this is that he denies and refuses to look into both non-plane fakery and the VicSims, just like Fetzer, which given his level of knowledge cannot be blamed on ignorance.

So the “Nose-Out” shot is no more “a mistake” than the faster-than-gravity fall of building seven or the fake top-down demolitions for Judy Wood to come out and explain and lead people on onto dead-ends and more time-wasters there. It is bait for deliberate gatekeeping shepherd/leaders.

This gatekeeping is done NOT because they’re NOT busted but because THEY CANNOT BE BUSTED and they know it! They certainly DO NOT CARE if you bust them since with a few busted items of proven “Big Lie,” such as fake video or two and the absurd and outrageous lie that buildings can be demolished due to jet-fuel fire, and you already could convict them using:

falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

False in one particular, false in everything.

This principle of Roman law is still respected and has been appropriated by other disciplines. The concept is that [b]if a witness has been shown to lie in one particular respect in a case, he is not to be trusted in anything else he says.[/b] This is why it is important for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court: [b]it discredits the rest of their testimony.[/b] The object behind the principle is [b]to reject questionable testimony (even if it might be true) before accepting falsehood into evidence.[/b]

The legal principles of interrogating witnesses have been drawn into the task of evaluating historical sources. Just as a witness in court can be impeached by being shown to have lied, an historical source likewise loses much of its authority if its author can be shown to have deliberately falsified something–how can we trust an author concerning fact X when we know him to have lied about fact Y? Such an author may corroborate something a better witness says, but has forfeited our trust where he speaks without corroboration.

So, too, a manuscript bearing copies of ancient works is called a witness: not to a crime, obviously, nor to a contract, nor to historical facts, but rather to an earlier version of its text. Many of the same principles have been drawn into this field as well. A manuscript which contains many errors or bad readings (for example, a simpler phrase replacing a more difficult one which the scribe did not understand, or frequent spelling blunders) cannot be trusted without corroboration from an independent manuscript (i.e., one which is neither its copy nor its descendent).

http://everything2.com/title/falsus+in+uno%252C+falsus+in+omnibus

They absolutely knew when they set up the 9-11 PsyOp that it wouldn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to BUST IT WIDE OPEN as a fraud but that nobody would be able to do a damn thing about it since they control the media, the intelligence agencies and the courts. This ABSOLUTE IRON GRIP CONTROL of all the major levers of power in not just the USA but through the worldwide usurucracy slavery network of the IMF, World Bank & Bank of International Settlements in 155 nations on earth, assures them complete confidence to toy with the public like labs rats.

Spingola Speaks 10 / 01 / 2012

Deanna Spingola interviews Stephen Goodson, a former (non-executive) Director of the South African Reserve Bank.

During the main part of this interview Goodson informs us that:

“By the turn of the 20th century there were 16 central banks, all except 2 in Europe:

England
Sweden
Denmark
Holland
Belgium
France
Spain
Portugal
Italy
Austria
Germany
Serbia
Romania
Bulgaria
Japan
Indonesia Java

After world war II the numbers expanded phenomenally.

The primary reason for world war I was to destroy the State Bank of the Russian empire. The secondary reasons were to break up the other empires – the Austro-Hungarian, German & Ottoman – into smaller states so that they could exploit them more efficiently through central banks and last but not least: the theft of Palestine.

So after WWI there was this huge expansion of central banks.

At the conference of Genoa in 1922, attended by the governors of the various central banks and the heads of state, Montague Norman, the governor of the Bank of England and a freemason, insisted that central banks should be independent of their governments.

In other words, they would be acting solely on behalf of private banking interests, not the state.

All these central banks were also being established at the same time as the establishment of the Bank of International Settlements in Basel which is the central bank of the central banks.

The Bank of International Settlements does not pay any tax. It is above and beyond the law, immune from any regulation or oversight and, of course, its ultimate control lies with the House of Rothschild through its investments in various central and private banks.

The purpose of WWII was to destroy the State Bank of Germany, the State Bank of Japan and the State Bank of Italy, followed by the dissolution of the European colonial empires and again to allow another huge proliferation of central banks, so that today we have 155 central banks!”

Their main problem, therefore, certainly wasn’t to do a “perfect” job of the PsyOp false-flag so that nobody could bust it as a fraud. Their problem is NOT to keep the fact that they told GIGANTIC lies multiple times that they can in no way, shape or form back up hidden, but to keep the knowledge of the main HOW of the big lie (media-fakery) from reaching the understanding of enough people for critical mass to develope, so that they can consolidate power even more, at which point, they can do whatever they want with no fear whatsoever of a revolution. This is because the majority of people can never get over the psychological block of the “Big Lie” technique.

Hitler identified this technique as the “BIG LIE” technique which his opponents, the Jews, were using against the German people. After Germany’s barbaric destruction by the usurocracy/NWO of that time allied with the most murderous regime in history: Stalinist Russia, which Rothschild agent Jacob Schiff of Kuhn-Loeb through Trotsky-Bronstein had put in power in the first place, there has been a massive black-propaganda effort to convince the entire world that Hitler was “advocating the Big Lie,” and most of all, to keep people from reading “Mein Kampf” themselves and finding out the truth. Since most people barely read any books at all except those they need to get their college indoctrination degrees and their slave-job in the “Brave New World,” they are tricked into fearing the “Notsees” and not seeing who Hitler was referring to:

“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle–which is quite true in itself–that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.” ~ Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf

Let’s repeat the most important part again, in case anyone is still confused:

“Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying ”

The “traces” of the “grossly impudent lie” are a bygone conclusion. It is not the traces they’re afraid of but of NOT LYING BIG ENOUGH to overcome this psychologcal barrier

@”In short, a shaky camera movement will make the whole image shaky. It’s impossible to have a real plane move smoothly against a shaky background. The helicopter shot is definitely a video composition with a fake plane, regardless of whether the background too is faked or not.”

It’s a layering job but it wasn’t done “live” as Alexander Collinsky Ass-Baker claims.

Also, since you have looked into it and do NOT believe the victims were real and that there WAS plenty of non-plane fakery, such as this

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2374833#p2374833

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=501&p=2387870&hilit=king+kong+man#p2387870

then you should not be praising this charlatan Ass-Baker (who ignores both the VicSims and all or most non-plane fakery) for baking your ass for you. lol

[Herge Degrelle]

“All that is important is that each group or individual should construct the plane of immanence on which they lead their life and carry on their business. Without these conditions you obviously do lack something, but you lack precisely the conditions that make a desire possible. Organizations of forms – formations of subjects – incapacitate desire: they subject it to law and introduce lack into it. If you tie someone up and say to him, ‘express yourself, friend,’ the most that he will be able to say is that he doesn’t want to be tied up. The only spontaneity in desire is doubtless of that kind: to not want to be oppressed, exploited, enslaved, or subjugated. But no desire has ever been created with non-wishes.” ~ Gilles Deleuze – Dialogues II: 96.

[Herge Degrelle]

Not talking about Utopia here, just a society where ARTIFICIALLY created strife and suffering is discouraged and minimized. Your washer, dryer, refrigerator, computer, TV, radio, phone, air-conditioning unit, heater and all the rest of the cheaply available modern conveniences of civilization are PROOF that a higher state of painlessness is possible. These products represent true wealth that only a voluntary co-operation of many creative people (each on their own level of inequality in division of labor) can produce.

Technology can rarely be shown to have been originally created as some “top-down” project to control people. Creative minds and parasitic minds don’t think alike and therefore their modes of behavior usually do not cross-over into each other in any major way. Parasites are parasites because they have perfected methods of tricking the creative and plundering them. They offer to finance the creative through usury counterfeiting and then co-opt the products to their own ends in their most advanced form. They can also pull people they did not finance into their web by weaponizing some false narratives and pushing it en-masse, such as “patriotism” and “duty.” This way, in times of war or “emergency,” many scientists and inventors go where their heroic image is buttered and hand over the means of their own eventual enslavement to their enemies whom they perceive as leaders.

“The most effective consolation in every misfortune and every affliction is to observe others who are more unfortunate than we: and everyone can do this. But what does that say for the condition of the whole ?

History shows us the life of nations and finds nothing to narrate but wars and tumults; the peaceful years appear only as occasional brief pauses and interludes. In just the same way the life of the individual is a constant struggle, and not merely a metaphorical one against want or boredom, but also an actual struggle against other people. He discovers adversaries everywhere, lives in continual conflict and dies with sword in hand.”

“Not the least of the torments which plague our existence is the constant pressure of time, which never lets us so much as draw breath but pursues us all like a taskmaster with a whip. It ceases to persecute only him it has delivered over to boredom.”

“And yet, just as our body would burst asunder if the pressure of the atmosphere were removed from it, so would the arrogance of men expand, if not to the point of bursting then to that of the most unbridled folly, indeed madness, if the pressure of want, toil, calamity and frustration were removed from their life. One can even say that we require at all times a certain quantity of care or sorrow or want, as a ship requires ballast, in order to keep on a straight course.

Work, worry, toil and trouble are indeed the lot of almost all men their whole life long. And yet if every desire were satisfied as soon as it arose how would men occupy their lives, how would they pass the time? Imagine this race transported to Utopia where everything grows of its own accord and turkeys fly around ready-roasted, where lovers find one another without any delay and keep one another without any difficulty: in such a place some men would die of boredom or hang themselves, some would fight and kill one another, and thus they would create for themselves more suffering than nature inflicts on them as it is. Thus for a race such as this, no stage, no form of existence is suitable other than the one it already possesses.”

~ Arthur Schopenhauer

• “Only by forgetting this primitive world of metaphor can one live with any repose, security, and consistency: only by means of the petrification and coagulation of a mass of images which originally streamed from the primal faculty of human imagination like a fiery liquid, only in the invincible faith that this sun, this window, this table is a truth in itself, in short, only by forgetting that he himself is an artistically creating subject, does man live with any repose, security, and consistency. If but for an instant he could escape from the prison walls of this faith, his “self consciousness” would be immediately destroyed. It is even a difficult thing for him to admit to himself that the insect or the bird perceives an entirely different world from the one that man does, and that the question of which of these perceptions of the world is the more correct one is quite meaningless, for this would have to have been decided previously in accordance with the criterion of the correct perception, which means, in accordance with a criterion which is not available.”

• “Between two absolutely different spheres, as between subject and object, there is no causality, no correctness, and no expression; there is, at most, an aesthetic relation: I mean, a suggestive transference, a stammering translation into a completely foreign tongue — for which there is required, in any case, a freely inventive intermediate sphere and mediating force. ‘Appearance’ is a word that contains many temptations, which is why I avoid it as much as possible. For it is not true that the essence of things ‘appears’ in the empirical world. A painter without hands who wished to express in song the picture before his mind would, by means of this substitution of spheres, still reveal more about the essence of things than does the empirical world. Even the relationship of a nerve stimulus to the generated image is not a necessary one. But when the same image has been generated millions of times and has been handed down for many generations and finally appears on the same occasion every time for all mankind, then it acquires at last the same meaning for men it would have if it were the sole necessary image and if the relationship of the original nerve stimulus to the generated image were a strictly causal one. In the same manner, an eternally repeated dream would certainly be felt and judged to be reality. But the hardening and congealing of a metaphor guarantees absolutely nothing concerning its necessity and exclusive justification.”

• “If each us had a different kind of sense perception — if we could only perceive things now as a bird, now as a worm, now as a plant, or if one of us saw a stimulus as red, another as blue, while a third even heard the same stimulus as a sound — then no one would speak of such a regularity of nature, rather, nature would be grasped only as a creation which is subjective in the highest degree. After all, what is a law of nature as such for us? We are not acquainted with it in itself, but only with its effects, which means in its relation to other laws of nature — which, in turn, are known to us only as sums of relations. Therefore all these relations always refer again to others and are thoroughly incomprehensible to us in their essence.”

“The drive toward the formation of metaphors is the fundamental human drive, which one cannot for a single instant dispense with in thought, for one would thereby dispense with man himself. This drive is not truly vanquished and scarcely subdued by the fact that a regular and rigid new world is constructed as its prison from its own ephemeral products, the concepts. It seeks a new realm and another channel for its activity, and it finds this in myth and in art generally. This drive continually confuses the conceptual categories and cells by bringing forward new transferences, metaphors, and metonymies. It continually manifests an ardent desire to refashion the world which presents itself to waking man, so that it will be as colorful, irregular, lacking in results and coherence, charming, and eternally new as the world of dreams. Indeed, it is only by means of the rigid and regular web of concepts that the waking man clearly sees that he is awake; and it is precisely because of this that he sometimes thinks that he must be dreaming when this web of concepts is torn by art.”

~ Fredrich Nietzsche, “On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense” (1873)

[Herge Degrelle]

It was sarcasm submerged in the chasm. Of course the Jews had it in for Fischer. That goes without saying.

No one is saying that “parasitic behavior” itself would disappear completely from human interactions if all the Jews living today suddenly decided out-of-the-clear-blue-sky, and in opposition to thousands of years of genetic-inbreeding and predisposition, to stop their cherished practice of usury advocated in their old testament, Torah and Talmud, stop fucking with people and figuring out more devious ways to fuck with people, and emigrate to Birobidzhan, the separate homeland given to them in Russia (but refused by the Zionist pricks who wanted go fuck over the Palestinians for 7 decades straight instead)

http://www.jailingopinions.com/birobidjan.htm

and concentrate on making cars or something. Kind of like the Germans they hate so much and whose Mercedes, BMW’s and Porsches they almost all drive in Hollywood and elsewhere, as soon as they stack up enough shekels. Why is it that Jews consider themselves the “chosen people” and better than everybody else and yet can’t make a single decent car or any other product worth a shit? I mean, can’t they even make a Jew version of an Italian car that breaks down all the time like FixItAgainTony, so they can then rip-off any non-Jew customers on parts and labor? lol

The problem with parasites is that they have to dealt with by FORCE. There is no other way and it is 100% your right to defend yourself by physical force, although, of course, they have made the defense of health and morality itself illegal to suit themselves. They don’t understand any other language and you will certainly have to expel the parasite from your body if it will not leave on its own and let you be BEFORE you can even hope to regain a healthy equilibrium and fix the laws of society. This would entail an order of thing where parasitic win-lose-dialectic behavior is discouraged and its opposite, the win-win dialectic of civilization and all true morality (that which gives more-from-all and more-for-all simultaneously, but never in equal proportion, in keeping with natural inequalities yet sacrificing none in the process, and requiring only the bearing of responsibilities for free choices and actions). The win-win dialectic can only be born of the eternally vigilant defense by PRIMAL FORCE of the non-aggression principle at its root at all costs.

That’s why Ezra Pound called Fascism “the surgical knife of Fascism.” It was a revolutionary movement organized to perform surgery on the dying patient of European civilization. The cancer was Jewish-created-and-promoted communism. Fascism of the old school of Mussolini’s, Hitler’s and Franco’s was not “surgery as a way of life,” as is always implied by non-stop black-propaganda against it for the past 68 years, but rather the restoration of IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO SURGERY should it be required, without having to go through any parliamentary bullshit and the usual deliberately instituted “democracy racket” of degenerate liberalism. Besides when Hitler got two-thirds majority in the German parliament, he was granted automatic dictatorial powers to operate through the “enabling act.” Didn’t take long for a dying Germany to prosper again did it, once they cut the cancer of usury out? Only two years! In fact, they had so much work by then that not only did they have full employment and no inflation but had to hire foreign labor.

[Herge Degrelle]

That’s right, those naughty super-evil Jezooits and their ever scheming Black Pope put Fischer up to it. They first made him a world famous champion through no merit of his own by ‘cheating’ behind closed-doors and then got him to bash Jews with vehemence and blame them for stealing close to ten-million dollars worth of his belongings in the USA. That’s exactly how it happened !! Anything to frame those poor, innocent Jews and the multi-trillionaire banking dynasties who just want to be left alone to practice their harmless usury on billions of people.

lol

Chess legend Bobby Fischer’s open letter to the Encyclopedia Judaica demanding that his name be taken out because, despite his genetic background, he had never been a Jew or subscribed to the Torah/Talmud criminal codes of Judaism.

http://k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/1hqlb97ig7/fischer_letter_4.jpg

“AN OPEN LETTER
FROM:
BOBBY FISCHER
THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPION
TO:
ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA

P.O. Box 50307
Pasadena, CA 91105
June 28, 1984

The Editors
ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA JERUSALEM
The Macmillan Company
866 Third Avenue
New York City, NY 10022

Gentlemen:

Knowing what I do about Judaism, I was naturally
distressed to see that you erroneously featured me
as a Jew in ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA. Please do not make
this mistake again in any future editions of your
voluminous, pseudo-authoritative publication. I am not
today, nor have I ever been a Jew, and as a matter of
fact, I am uncircumcised.

I suggest rather than fraudulently misrepresenting me
to be a Jew, and dishonestly abusing my name and
reputation as a kind of advertising gimmick to improve
the image of your religion (Judaism), you try to
promote your religion on its own merits–if indeed it
has any!

In closing, I trust that I am not being unrealistically
optimistic, in thanking you in advance for your
anticipated cooperation in this matter.

Truly yours,

Bobby Fischer,
The World Chess Champion

c: Keter Publishing House
Jerusalem Ltd.”

http://concen.org/forum/thread-45256.html

[Herge Degrelle]

Nietzsche on the “Jesus” PsyOp:

“The Jews… have entrenched themselves within all the provisos under which a people can survive intact, or has been allowed to survive. Out of their own consciousness they have evolved a set of ideas in opposition to all natural conditions of living, one by one they have taken religion, culture, morality, history, and psychology, and converted them irreparably into a contradiction of their natural meaning.

We meet with the same phenomenon elsewhere, but all disjointed, a mere copy, for the Christian church lacks all claim to originality as compared with the ‘holy race’…

Because of their capacity for distortion, the Jews are the most fateful people in human history. In the course of their operations they have hoodwinked mankind so much that, even to this day, the Christian can feel anti-Semitic without realizing that he himself is the logical consequence of Judaism.

In my ‘Genealogy of Morals’, I give the first psychological explanation of the distinction between a noble morality and a morality of resentment; the latter being merely a negation of the former and this latter is the Jewish-Christian morality through and through!

In order to be able to say no to life on the up-grade, to success, power, and beauty, and self-affirmation on earth, it was necessary for the instinct of resentment, or for the genius of resentment, to discover another world, one from which that affirmation of life could be regarded as evil and reprehensible.

Psychologically considered, the Jews are a people very hard to suppress, who when they had to face impossible surroundings, deliberately selected the part of decadence, and made their choice with a profound worldly wisdom in order to preserve themselves intact. I do not mean that the Jews were overcome by decadence, but that they saw in it a method by which they could assert themselves against the world.

The Jews are the opposite of decadent, they have simply been obliged to take on the part, so much so that with an incredible degree of histrionic genius, they have managed to place themselves in control of all decadent movements in order to make themselves stronger than the assertive forces of life.

The kind of man who seeks power under Judaism or Christianity uses decadence as no more than a means to an end. This kind of fellow has a real interest in making people sick, and in upsetting the ideas of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ ‘true’ and ‘false’ in a way which is dangerous to life and a slander against this world in which we live…

Here we are among Jews… the elevation of deceit in attitude and phrase to the status of an art – is not any accident due to the exceptional talents of any one individual. It is a racial matter. In the formulation of Christianity, the art of concocting holy lies, which is the essence of Jewishness, after many centuries of earnest apprenticeship and practice in Judea, has reached technical perfection…

Little super-Jews, fit only for the madhouse, reversed all values to suit themselves… Paul, the Jew, the eternal and perfect Jew, Paul the genius, realized that, by means of the small sectarian Christian movement which had broken away from Judaism, a world conflagration could be kindled. He realized that, by means of ‘God on the Cross’ everything underhand, seditious, and a product of rebellious intrigues within the empire, might be welded together into one immense power. ‘For salvation is of the Jews’.”

~ from “The Anti-Christ” by Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)

[Herge Degrelle]

‘Satanists’?

😉

They were Jews.

One look at the kosher sources for this article should be enough to crumple it and throw it in the garbage with the gefilte fish.

And who’s this ‘Richard Evans’ that wrote the article ? Any relation to this Richard Evans:

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/index.html

Henry Makow is a Jewish limited hangout shill and not a very good one at that. Everything this guy does will be to obfuscate the fact that it was not ‘Satanists,’ but the Jews and their millennia old usurocracy kicked out of 100’s of countries and territories, that the Germans also successfully defended themselves against in the 1930’s and it was because of this successful defense that their entire country prospered like never before in its history and never again since, once again, within 3 years. And it was ALL of Judea that collectively declared war on them in 1933, a couple of months after Adolf was freely voted in and given dictatorial powers through the enabling act (2/3 majority in parliament) to take care of business against their criminal enterprises crippling Germany.

Just recently this guy got another limited hangout clown, a guy by the name of Anthony Migchels, given the assignment to slowly build himself a reputation as Mr-Anti-Austrian-Economics amongst the Alex-Jones dissidents, on his team to finally pull out his shill card by claiming the German economic success under Hitler was a myth. And surprise, surprise, wasn’t it cute when Migchel’s main source was also Jewish.

Spingola Speaks 09-24-2013 – Guest: Rodney Martin rebuts Anthony Migchels’ article, The Myth of Hitler as Monetary Reformer posted by Dr. Henry Makow

Now, the last thing I am is an involuntary collectivist, so I’m not a big fan of Rodney Martin’s one-track-minded White Nationalist NSDAP worship and democracy-racketism either (RM agenda-shills on the media fakery issue and parted with John Friend in his WN organization because of this), but on this issue he was a hell of a lot more honest about history than Mig-shills, who from this point on, deserves the ridicule thrown his way, unless he changes his opinion to coincide with the facts Martin presented and repents for his shillery.

Somewhere in the balance betweeen etiquette and free-speech is where the engine of true civilization finds its fuel :

“Politeness, n. The most acceptable hypocrisy.” — Ambrose Bierce (1842 – 1914), The Devil’s Dictionary

“Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.” — Eric Hoffer (1902 – 1983)

“And we should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least once. And we should call every truth false which was not accompanied by at least one laugh.” ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

P.S. Why no preview button ?

[Author]

Posts