Remember the formula for disaster media events. Problem, reaction, solution. The solution sometimes take time to be revealed, but looks like we have the solution formulation quite quickly.
The explosions in Quebec caused by a derailed train carrying oil will fuel the debate over whether pipelines are a more palatable way to move petroleum products compared to railways, which have been picking up business as pipeline projects face stiff opposition.
In other words the pipeline is good for the people. Since we have to get the oil from A to B somehow, agitate them to rally around no trains through town, and instead use pipelines.
So we have fear and money as the main drivers once more. Scare the people, reward them with new infrastructure, and then enrich a corporation on the other end of the financial tug of war (in this case, the east-west pipeline vs rail).that drove the psyOp in the first place.
PsyOps must always be multi-purpose. To create such a big event requires a high level of coordination, so the payoff must be enough to satisfy all end users to make it worthwhile.
So the question needs to be asked again: are psyOps (where no-one dies but are reported as dying) a moral or legitimate way to move the population towards a corporate/government point of view? Is this corporatism when the intelligence/government apparatus is used to further corporate good? Is corporate good the same as the common good? Is corporatism fascism? (Mussolini said so).
Personally, I don’t mind one way or the other how fuel moves. We need it, it’s the only form of stable on demand power known to man. We need power.
I just have a problem how those that rule over us are lying all the time to get what they want, and I leave me no way of knowing what’s really happening thanks to their constant deception.If people remain unaware of the method, it will only get worse. Is that what the sheeple want?