The “Holocaust” as a PSYOP?

Be the 1st to vote.

This is a third rail topic, by design. If you’ve studied any revisionist history, the question John asks is certainly valid.

I’ll even add one more dimension to the psyOp soup: is the whole Jesuit/Jew debate a carefully constructed dialectic psyOp? Once more, those that frame and control the debate pit two sides against each other, while the controllers, who may be neither or both, pull the strings?

There was no Jewish “Holocaust” during WWII: the National Socialists simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, but had no intentions or plans to “exterminate” or “genocide” the European Jewry. However, the Soviets and her Western allies (the US and UK primarily), who were under the control of international Jewish Communists and plutocrats, certainly did seek the destruction of the German nation (which they themselves openly admitted), and implemented specific policies aimed at accomplishing this goal both during and after the war. Truth be told, the German and other nationalist-minded European peoples who allied with Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist government did in fact experience a very real genocide during and after WWII, not the Jews of Europe.

via John Friend’s Blog: The “Holocaust” as a PSYOP.

No tags for this post.

23 thoughts on “The “Holocaust” as a PSYOP?

  1. Herge Degrelle

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/1zqi4e4…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/9u9hi06…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/8sos53y…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/csz3aay…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/75po718…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/c4q201r…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/084206e…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/x4ryd3n…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/il1jn4e…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/iqgc99s…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/fiuy859…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/8270z1z…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/v7d5054…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/g06t08y…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/aokj1mg…

    k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/uh76cxn…

    And that’s just the beginning folks.

    The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur R. Butz (2003 Revised Edition):

    vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/Ho…

    David Irving and the “Aktion Reinhardt Camps” by Jürgen Graf

    inconvenienthistory.com/archiv…

  2. or e bil

    Here’s a story about a human-skin lampshade.

    “That this particular lampshade is human seems incontrovertible. Back in 2006 it was tested by the same DNA lab the FBI chose to identify the 11,000 body parts left after 9-11. And that lab determined that the lampshade was indeed “of human origin.”

    tvblogs.nationalgeographic.com…

    It would be tough to believe one story without the other, right?

    B-b-but how did this human lampshade thing become an old urban legend? The evidence was obviously shown at Nuremberg by a very well known attorney. An attorney whose son would eventually become a U.S. Senator and the CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America.

  3. Aaron Johnson

    I think the whole Holocaust topic is interesting. I don’t know too many details about it but based on what I’ve heard I believe it was a psyop. I wish I could hear from people who were there when it happened.

  4. aralsea

    If you watch Judgement at Nuremburg (!961 version), all the prosecution has to do is show the films of the liberated camps (US army footage) and it’s case closed. Maxmillan Shell does a superb job in trying to defend his clients after the films are shown but is obviously defeated.

    Watch this clip www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpIb61…

  5. tsisageya

    John Friend is a David Duke fan. I called him on it one day, and he banned me, or something. He’s got nothing for me.

    Hello all assholes.

      1. John

        What does “white supremacist” even mean? How exactly is Dr. Duke a “white supremacist”? I think you have been programmed by the mass media and educational establishment. And you are supposed to be up to speed on PSYOPS?! You’re still falling for this crap with your “white supremacism” BS! Come on man!

        Caring about the White race does not make you a “white supremacist”. Being honest and openly talking about racial issues does not make you a “racist” or a “hater” or a “supremacist” or a “bigot” – grow up. And Ab, I don’t know if you’re referring to Dr. Duke as controlled opposition, or me as controlled opposition, or both of us – but I can assure you, Dr. Duke is the real deal. I can also assure you I am the real deal – I’m not bullshitting anyone. I am using my real name and sticking my neck out there to expose the real criminals who are deceiving and programming the vast majority of the world’s population. The Jesuits do not control the media, the US government, the international banking industry, Hollywood, the educational establishment, etc. – the Jews do, and they openly brag about it in their own newspapers and books. Jewish intellectuals (read: psychopaths) and propagandists have studied human psychology and have systematically implemented deceptive propaganda techniques and PSYOPS to control humanity – it’s that simple guys.

      2. Herge Degrelle

        It’s not just Duke and White Nationalists that find it necessary to criticize or ‘bash’ Jews. Lots of people have ‘bashed’ Jews throughout history and will continue to do so, as long as Jews act the way they do towards non-Jews. Jews have been kicked out of more countries and territories than any other group of people.

        www.biblebelievers.org.au/expe…

        www.sunray22b.net/expulsions.h…

        Let’s let Theodor Herzl, one of the founders of Zionism clarify things for us:

        “The Jewish question of anti-semitism exists everywhere Jews live in perceptible numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by the Jews in the course of their migrations. We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our presence produces persecution. This is the case in every country and will remain so even in those highly civilized nations like France, until the Jewish question finds a solution on the political basis.” — Theodor Herzl – The Jewish State, 1896

        Notice that he says ‘we naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our presence produces persecution.’ Isn’t that odd ? Why would the presence of Jews in a place where they’re not persecuted, where no one even has anything against them, produce persecution ? It couldn’t be because how they behave, could it ?

        Jews are persecuted and ‘bashed’ because criminal behavior should be persecuted and ‘bashed.’ There are always individuals who do not follow the behavior of the mob that butters their bread, but these are the exception, not the rule. Jews, as a group, from the Rothschild head-usurers on down, have engaged in more criminality, especially and mostly against non-Jews, than any other organized collective in the history of the world.

        Their collective is organized by both race and religion, allowing Jews to play the race card or the religion card whenever it serves their interests.

        For example, in the following video, during a discussion about ‘black history month,’ Mike Wallace responds to Morgan Freeman’s specifically calling him a ‘white man’ by playing the race card and saying he’s ‘Jewish,’ meaning he’s not white or he’s genetically distinct from white Europeans :

        www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtY…

        Wallace could have easily done the same if Christians were being criticized by also saying he’s ‘Jewish,’ this time meaning he’s a different religion.

        Most Jews are genetically distinct from European whites and hence the reason they have their own race-specific hereditary disorders which are also further different among the Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Mizrahi lines (but much closer to and mixed in with each other than they are to European genes):

        www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=cont…

        www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=cont…

        www.jewishgenetics.org/?q=cont…

        www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/…

        The Jews that are not predominantly of Ashkenazi, Sephardic or Mizrahi heritage and convert to Judaism are a tiny minority. If your mother is a Jew, you are considered Jewish by halakah law. That’s why Alex Jones’ wife being half-Jewish from her mother’s side, makes AJ’s kids eligible for citizenship in racist, Marxist Israel:

        archive.org/details/TheLifeOfA…

        archive.org/details/MyFarewell…

        web.archive.org/web/2011061201…

        However, there are many Jews that look similar to white Europeans. This is because modern Jews are Middle Easterners with some European genetic admixture, 30% on average. Some Jews have more admixture, some have less. This is because Jews have gradually interbred with Europeans over the past 2,300 years.

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_…

        If someone freely chooses to be a ‘racist,’ based an interpretation of reality you don’t agree with, that’s none of your business, as long as you can also freely choose not to deal with him. If you consider ‘racism’ or putting a high priority on the health and propagation of people of your own genetic background and those closer to it than those farther away from it, an unpardonable sin, then, you are free to go commit ‘unpardonable’ sins completely ignorant of any racial differences between people that lived continents apart for centuries millennia in the opposite direction.

        But, on the other hand, you might not like fat people and freely choose to avoid them and never have to risk some Jew-indoctrinated robot calling you a ‘Porkist’ or a ‘Fatist.’ That would be your right also and none of anybody’s business who likes hanging around fat people and considers your behavior ‘supremacist.’

        The problem starts only when force (or the indirect force of fraud) is initiated against individuals to impose your choices and your likes-dislikes, hates-loves, morality-immorality on others.

        “In the U.S. cotton states, after the war . . . the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

        The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm — like Joseph.

        In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics — but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants — but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event . . . I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000, I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics.” ~ Mark Twain – “Concerning the Jews,” Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899

        “Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single gluttonous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.

        This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ….” — Mikhail Bakunin

        Source: Michael Bakunin, 1871, Personliche Beziehungen zu Marx. In: Gesammelte Werke. Band 3. Berlin 1924. P. 204-216.

        dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_…

        1. Herge Degrelle

          Without free choice, there is no such thing as morality (more-of-all and more-for-all simultaneously, the win-win dialectic of civilization as opposed to win-lose dialectic of the jungle). You cannot force your morality on others, even if it’s a ‘good’ morality. The simple act of having to ‘force’ it already makes it invalid.

          “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’, because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” “No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.” ~ Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816

          “If diversity is so wonderful, why does it have to be enforced at gunpoint ? ” – anonymous

          “It is a notorious fact that the morality of society as a whole is in inverse ratio to its size; for the greater the aggregation of individuals, the more the individual factors are blotted out, and with them morality, which rests entirely on the moral sense of the individual and the freedom necessary for this. Hence, every man is, in a certain sense, unconsciously a worse man when he is in society than when acting alone; for he is carried by society and to that extent relieved of his individual responsibility. . . . Any large company composed of wholly admirable persons has the morality and intelligence of an unwieldy, stupid, and violent animal. The bigger the organization, the more unavoidable is its immorality and blind stupidity. Society, by automatically stressing all the collective qualities in its individual representatives, puts a premium on mediocrity, on everything that settles down to vegetate in an easy, irresponsible way. Individuality will inevitably be driven to the wall. This process begins in school, continues at the university, and rules all departments in which the State has a hand. In a small social body, the individuality of its members is better safeguarded; and the greater is their relative freedom and the possibility of conscious responsibility. Without freedom there can be no morality.” ~ Carl Jung (from The Relations Between the Ego and the Unconscious, p.169)

    1. John

      I have a lot of respect for Dr. David Duke after reading his book “My Awakening” (which I’m sure YOU haven’t read) and I do follow his website and listen to a lot of his radio programs on Rense Radio Network. He is SPOT ON with his commentary on virtually all of the subjects he talks about. So yeah, I am a Dr. Duke fan – what of it? The man has been fighting for truth and justice in the REAL WORLD using his REAL NAME (unlike you and most people commenting here, including the owner of this website) naming the REAL CRIMINALS and making no bones about it. I have never banned anyone on my website – I moderate the comments and if I blocked some of your comments it was probably for good reason.

  6. tsisageya

    Why do you keep harping on the “HOLOCAUST” in the guise of something else?

    Do you even know what “HOLOCAUST” means and according to whom?

  7. rickpotvin

    Yeah, this is worth looking into in my opinion. I’m surprised you’ve opened that topic up– but pleased about it.

    Right now, I’m becoming increasingly bothered by the fact that I can’t find any entity that will prove earth rotates by using a triple gimballed powered gyroscope over 6 hrs. Notes here…
    www.network54.com/Forum/153202……can+be+proven+or+disproven+using+a+gyroscope.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.