Daily Archives: October 24, 2013

The flying penis

Be the 1st to vote.

Karen has been in the news this week, which prompted Simon to post this some time ago. There’s so much gold in the cluesforum.info archives, you really should spend your media time there.


“”filmed from the flight deck window” of Discovery -STS124!)


See it to believe it ! – it’s … unreal!

watch the endless 5minute-long ‘handheld pan shot’ here >>>>>> “EXTERNAL TANK HANDHELD VIDEO” :

I elect this NASA/DISNEY animation to the Oscar award of “most ravingly stoopid of all times” (moonhoax included).

“Filmed from the Space Shuttle’s flight deck window” – yeah, rrright!

If you have problems to process just how dreadfully silly and unrealistic this ‘falling penis’ shot is – remember that:

– The shuttle is supposedly travelling at 11.000 miles per hour – or whatever…( btw, its rockets officially burn “11.000” pounds of fuel per second. )

– The tank is supposedly falling away from (and behind) the shuttle – towards the ground…

– Nonetheless, Karen (supposedly) not only captures it smoothly – during an over 5-minute-long pan shot, but she somehow gradually zooms in on it, masterfully – to keep the falling penis from diminishing in size in the lens-view! Wonder woman!

Still don’t get the point? Ok, so have you ever been sitting by an airplane window, looking out, and seeing another plane zooming by in the opposite direction of your flight? Well, I have – and I can tell you that it takes only a few seconds before I can’t see it anymore. Now, imagine a tank attached to your flight which gets jettisoned BEHIND your aircraft. And this time, you are travelling at Mach 5 or more. What chances for you and your camera to film a steady, five-minute-video of its descent?

Let me tell you: ZERO chances. None, nada, zilch. The truth here is that NASA has been psy-opping all of us for years with the help of DISNEY/HOLLYWOOD imagery. That’s what.

And as you see in the gif loop above, some frames of the tank images sometimes ‘glitch’ or ‘shear’…

IN THIS WAY:__________________________________OR IN THIS WAY

Now, don’t let anyone tell you these are normal/typical video artifacts. Because they are not. Instead, they bear a striking resemblance to other faked video material – such as the dreadful imagery we were offered – for instance – on 9/11.

via ENDEAVOUR – and the spaced-out NASA efforts • Cluesforum.info.

No tags for this post.

What happened to news photographers?

Be the 1st to vote.
click to enlarge

click to enlarge

No need for sim-photographers, or fauxtographers these days. The fakers are using FACEBOOK as their photo fakers of choice. Perhaps this is the only way to legally have the pictures unaccountable or inexplainable to any law or authority.

Other things to look for in photos when looking for fakery:

  • fuzzy images
  • washed out images
  • backlighting, often faked, to explain overexposed images
  • straight lines defining irregular shapes, like heads or bodies
  • people put in impossible positions (ie. appearing to float)
  • shadows going different directions
  • FACEBOOK, Youtube, Instagram, Twitter credited for image – may as well be anonymous
  • pictures in a story credited to a (sim)reporter. It appears many papers are using one or two reporters for all their works of fiction. Perhaps the reporters aren’t even humans (I try and avoid using the word person now)

If you have more tips, leave them below in the comments. Being a fakeologist makes reading the news so much more interesting.

Shocked Ottawa woman gives birth at home, not realizing she was pregnant | National Post.

No tags for this post.