Karen has been in the news this week, which prompted Simon to post this some time ago. There’s so much gold in the cluesforum.info archives, you really should spend your media time there.
KAREN’S HANDHELD FALLING PENIS SHOT
220;”filmed from the flight deck window” of Discovery -STS124!)
See it to believe it ! – it’s … unreal!
watch the endless 5minute-long ‘handheld pan shot’ here >>>>>> “EXTERNAL TANK HANDHELD VIDEO” :
I elect this NASA/DISNEY animation to the Oscar award of “most ravingly stoopid of all times” (moonhoax included).
“Filmed from the Space Shuttle’s flight deck window” – yeah, rrright!
If you have problems to process just how dreadfully silly and unrealistic this ‘falling penis’ shot is – remember that:
– The shuttle is supposedly travelling at 11.000 miles per hour – or whatever…( btw, its rockets officially burn “11.000” pounds of fuel per second. )
– The tank is supposedly falling away from (and behind) the shuttle – towards the ground…
– Nonetheless, Karen (supposedly) not only captures it smoothly – during an over 5-minute-long pan shot, but she somehow gradually zooms in on it, masterfully – to keep the falling penis from diminishing in size in the lens-view! Wonder woman!
Still don’t get the point? Ok, so have you ever been sitting by an airplane window, looking out, and seeing another plane zooming by in the opposite direction of your flight? Well, I have – and I can tell you that it takes only a few seconds before I can’t see it anymore. Now, imagine a tank attached to your flight which gets jettisoned BEHIND your aircraft. And this time, you are travelling at Mach 5 or more. What chances for you and your camera to film a steady, five-minute-video of its descent?
Let me tell you: ZERO chances. None, nada, zilch. The truth here is that NASA has been psy-opping all of us for years with the help of DISNEY/HOLLYWOOD imagery. That’s what.
And as you see in the gif loop above, some frames of the tank images sometimes ‘glitch’ or ‘shear’…
IN THIS WAY:__________________________________OR IN THIS WAY
Now, don’t let anyone tell you these are normal/typical video artifacts. Because they are not. Instead, they bear a striking resemblance to other faked video material – such as the dreadful imagery we were offered – for instance – on 9/11.