JFK 11/22/63 + 50

Be the 1st to vote.

This is a post to catch all JFK talk and links, as the big anniversary approaches.

I will move Blue Moon’s excellent comments on the topic over here tomorrow.

I will restate my position on JFK: I believe this was the first made-for-TV psyop. I believe JFK was a populist figure designed to attract and excite the younger generation to politics, with the express purpose to let them down and manipulate them into accepting a darker force that was required to restore law and order and war. The whole tragic event was scripted and acted, constructed to conform with the law, from before Kennedy even appeared in the public eye.

This means that it is unlikely he was killed, and that anyone else was injured or killed. Like any Hollywool actor, he played a part and went “home” at the end of the day.

The myriad of rabbit trails were put in place to deceive and keep researchers busy for 100 years, diverting them from the primary deception that the whole event and concept was fabricated by the intelligence and psywar communities.

It is the success of this deception that the moon hoax and 9/11 were based on, as well as all the smaller hoaxes and psyops in between.

27 thoughts on “JFK 11/22/63 + 50

  1. Jack33

    According to Wiki, the island of Skorpios had zero inhabitants as of 1980. It seems the island has experienced a population explosion of sorts over the past 30 years with a reported population of 1 in 1991, 2 in 2001and 5 in 2011.

    Maybe I’m not familiar with how Billionaires ‘roll’, but if you view the island from Google Earth you’ll notice no fewer that 12 very sizable structures(mansions) spred out in various location through out the Island. There also appears to be a heli port, and small air strip, a tennis court, a basket ball court, and what looks like a putting green and sand trap.

    Seems like a lot of developement for a place that’s gone from having no perminant residents in 1980 to five in 2011, and is only used as a personal private vacation getaway for family and friends

  2. richard benedict

    I have studied both the JFK and Manson stories to death and always marveled at how both have sort of an elastic quality to them and a never ending list of coincidences, etc, When I first heard the fakery angle everything fell instantly into place for both of them. Of course, that explains it. As Fetzer would say, it is the hypothesis that evidence best confers. I thought you all would like to know that if you read Prouty’s book , JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, in chapter 3 he goes into detail on how the CIA would fake terrorist incidents well into the 1980’s. He said they even went so far as to stage “battles” between U.S. and N.V.A. forces for high level Pentagon dignitaries, (I believe it was McNamara) as well. Prouty’s admission in its context is truly telling, especially when you consider the revelation from the Cold War that showed the intelligence communities used the media to telegraph messages. (See the movie A Beautiful Mind, which shows this)

    In John Dean’s hard cover edition of Blind Ambition, in Chapter 7, “Breaking Point” p. 213, as the Watergate problems threaten, Dean non nonchalantly and matter of factly states that, to avoid exposure and prosecution, the president could contact a non-descript general and use a little used and remote Air Force Base to sneak Dean and his family out of the country. The disappearance being explained as Dean dying in an accident “accident” = fake.
    I thought you may like to know this. Thanks again AB for what you do.

  3. richard benedict

    I have studied both the JFK and Manson stories to death and always marveled at how both have sort of an elastic quality to them and a never ending list of coincidences, etc, When I first heard the fakery angle everything fell instantly into place for both of them. Of course, that explains it. As Fetzer would say, it is the hypothesis that evidence best confers. I thought you all would like to know that if you read Prouty’s book , JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, in chapter 3 he goes into detail on how the CIA would fake terrorist incidents well into the 1980’s. He said they even went so far as to stage “battles” between U.S. and N.V.A. forces for high level Pentagon dignitaries, (I believe it was McNamara) as well. Prouty’s admission in its context is truly telling, especially when you consider thhe revealtion from the Cold War that showed the intelligence communities used the media to telegraph messages. (See the movie A Beautiful Mind, which shows this)

    In John Dean’s hard cover edition of Blind Ambition, in Chapter 7, “Breaking Point” p. 213, as the Watergate problems threaten, Dean non nonchalantly and matter of factly states that, to avoid exposure and prosecution, the President could contact a non-descript general and use a little used and remote Air Force Base to sneak Dean and his family out of the country. The disappearance being explained as Dean dying in an accident “accident” = fake.
    I thought you may like to know this. Thanks again AB for what you do.

  4. Banazîr Galbasi

    JFK was supposedly buried at Arlington Cemetery across the street from the Pentagon. Funny story just two weeks before he was allegedly murdered he paid a visit to Arlington and commented how peaceful it was and essentially picked out a plot where he’d like to ‘live the rest of his life’ (!).

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7k6Ky…

    I can’t find the scene from the documentary where it explains this but here is the whole thing:

    kickass.to/smithsonian-arlingt…

    Worth checking out because there are probably lot of empty caskets there, 9/11 victims etc.
    As a side note there was a 1999 movie called Arlington Road about a suspected terrorist neighbor. Any connection? Not sure.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlingto…

  5. Blue Moon

    One last comment on JFK and then I’ll give it a rest- As Ab reminds regularly, all of these psy-ops are worked within the parameters of the law- As far as I know, there is no law against abdicating the office of the president without warning or comment- Faking your own death is also not a crime, as long as any taxes or monies owed get paid as a result of the sudden non-existence of the individual who has “died”- Firing blanks is not a crime as long as there is no obvious attempt to harm someone while doing so- I seriously doubt that there was any law in 1963 Texas that prohibited discharging blanks- Lying is not a crime as long as you are not under oath- Lying on television or reporting news without qualifying that it is fiction is not a crime- No laws were broken on 11/22/63 in Dealy Plaza- I would like to know who paid for the lavish funeral- I’m certain no economic fraud was committed by illegal use of taxpayer dollars- The Kennedy clan was apparently rich enough that they could pick up the tab to steer clear of such concerns- The scrum in the Dallas jail parking garage with Oswald and Ruby was clearly theater, but I wonder if equity waivers were signed along with confidentiality agreements just to keep the paper work in order should anyone actually catch on- It’s quite likely that every cop, reporter and gangster/intelligence asset in that garage attended the same Masonic lodge and silence was guaranteed- Resting….

      1. Blue Moon

        Yeah, Ollie is a stone cold perp- His CV reads so Army Intel it ain’t funny- Wall Street father, raised Episcopalian (the denomination of choice for back east Bush the First-level bad guys), one year of Yale to be trained in spookery and then off to French speaking Viet Nam to “teach”- God knows what kind of chicanery he was involved in out there- I seriously doubt he saw combat (like Hitler, his backstory seems to have a few stretchers) unless it was to film the aftermath of skirmishes, staged or otherwise- He likely contributed directly to the oft repeated description: “Viet Nam, the First Televised War”- In Hollywool he specializes in writing psycho-criminal potboilers (Scarface/Midnight Express) and later graduates to director with counter-culture apologetics (Platoon/Born on the Fourth of July/The Doors) false histories (JFK/Nixon) and a morally ambivalent paen to capitalist predators like his old man with “Wall Street”, which is pure poopaganda that implies that the “free” market is fine as a concept, but only when morally fit people play by the rules- Of course morally fit people don’t want anything to do with sucking the public’s blood- That system was designed by parasites for their own nourishment- Sorry for the screed but I was a film major and I am disgusted with our home grown cinema-

        1. ab Post author

          I have always fallen for Hollywool stuff – and loved Wall Street. Even bought it. Blue Moon you’re an interesting cat – be great to interview you for the broadcast. Hit me up on Skype so we can chat if you want.

  6. tsisageya

    I’m thinking we should stop it with JFK. I’m thinking we should, instead, try to understand how this country was made. This country was made through thievery, violence/war/genocide, and all the subsequent bullshit. We all stand on stolen ground. WE WANT. WE TAKE. WE CHEAT YOU. WE KILL YOU. Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.

    The language is pretty plain even if you don’t know history. Take a look at Gaza and see the same thing happening. Don’t get me started.

    1. ArmunnRigh

      «This country was made through thievery, violence/war/genocide, and all the subsequent bullshit. We all stand on stolen ground. WE WANT. WE TAKE. WE CHEAT YOU. WE KILL YOU.»

      Was it? Or was that a documental psy-op?

      Not stating either way – just having my legitimate doubts.

  7. lux

    Have a look at this photo supposedly showing JFK & Jackie, etc in the limo in Dallas:
    upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia…

    It is featured on the wiki “JFK Assassination” page. It also got very wide media circulation at the time of the “assassination” including Life magazine, many newspapers, etc. But, look at how fake it appears. Obviously a crude cut & paste composite. It must have taken quite a lot of careful work to create.

    Now ask yourself, if JFK was really there in Dallas why go to all this trouble to create such an obviously fake photo?

    The other news photos and movie footage of him in Dallas could have been taken any time and may not have even been taken in Dallas.

    I suspect that at least a portion of the Zapruder film (or possibly all of it) was shot well before the “assassination” day and later manipulated as needed and that JFK never went to Dallas that day. He was likely already long gone to his hideaway when the blanks were fired in Dealey Plaza. The limo could have easily contained a double plus Jackie and the others. The crowd was too far away to notice and would never have been the wiser.

    1. ArmunnRigh

      Really fake…

      Also, the so-called Zapruder film that aired on TV more than a decade later was provenly either completely fake or, at the very least, altered, as you indicated:

      The Great Zapruder Film Hoax

      Note that the author of this analysis believes that the event happened but that the Zapruder film was tampered with before being aired more than 10 years later. Nevertheless, his video analysis is very useful.

  8. Gabriel

    I am done with voting as well. The last person I voted for was Ron Paul and that was just as I was becoming aware. I now know Ron Paul is just another actor. Prior to that I always voted republican/Tea Party and what a waste of my life spending time on that. I will find another way to change this reality.

  9. lux

    BTW, this is a very minor point but I would put the JFK assassination as Major TV Psy-op #3 rather than #1. The first two being Sputnik and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Both of these scared the shit out of America at the time.

    There were also some other major TV media operations mesmerizing the USA during the late-50s-early-60s period, namely the Francis Gary Powers event aka Nikita Khrushchev aka the Cold War aka the Communist Conspiracy and, of course, Elvis.

  10. lux

    I suggest that anyone interested in this subject to search YouTube for “shooting Lee Harvey Oswald” and watch the old TV newsreels that supposedly show the killing of Oswald. It’s easy today to see how fake that whole thing was — not a drop of blood anywhere yet he was supposedly fatally shot in the abdomen. No blood on Oswald, on his hands, on the floor where he fell, on the people who caught him as he fell, on the stretcher that took him to the ambulance, etc. etc. It’s quite humorous actually and it shows how fake this whole JFK psy-op was.

  11. ArmunnRigh

    As I’ve stated in another comment previously, in the age of TV, documental psyops were not good enough anymore. If in the strict feudal systems of the past any psyop would really only need to fool a very little minority that were in charge, the implementation of democracy (which, for them, was the door opener for the destruction of the kingdoms of the past in order to unite the world under a unified culture), had its price: now the people would also have to be indoctrinated into their desired worldview.

    Audiovisual fakery would then have to become the norm and JFK’s assassination, perhaps, it’s first great worldwide test. Although the holocaust maybe was the first psyop involving fake images, it was not an event that would be staged in public and in realtime. All the images and myths of the holocaust were fabricated afterwards and the event itself was supposed to have happened in secret. JFK’s killing was public from the get-go.

    Indeed, it was the template for all the psyops later perpetrated that used public spaces and audiovisual media.

  12. Blue Moon

    JFK in a NUTshell: I believe the events in Dealy Plaza were staged, with blood squibs and blank cartridge shells and stage makeup and actors- Composite films were made from multiple camera angles and a conspiracy industry was born- The tale is told with technology understood by the public at that time: Home movies, Polaroid snap shots and black&white newsreel film stock-
    Dramatis personae:
    Shooters (who were not real murderers because they were firing blanks and therefore not hesitant about this ruse that they only knew their part of)-
    Cameramen (not the press cameramen) to record the “fact” of the president’s murder in all its gory ektachrome nastiness-
    Riders in the limo would have to know enough of the script, but not all-
    Trusted veteran military film-effects experts-
    The cast and crew of this murder mystery probably numbered less than two dozen and all were trusted to hold their tongues (And who would believe them, anyway? This stage show was not possible for the public to conceive of back then- Some concepts can’t fit certain historical epochs-Like heliocentrism, for example, was once thought crazy talk- [cough]-)
    No one else present, be they press, politicians, cops, secret service or witnesses, needed to know anything- As soon as that car tore ass down the street, the rest of the event was press releases- No doctors, no military men calling the shots in the ER, no nurses, no blood stained Jackie walking around in a pink daze- A team of well vetted, need to know, information carriers gave the PR people scripts and the press ate it up- Malcolm Kilduf, the assistant press secretary was told to announce the president was dead- He did so, certainly believing it was true- And so it went out to the wire services and over the television airwaves-
    Why stage it and not just create films on a back lot? Innocent witnesses back up the certainty of what they think they saw with the press releases that the president was shot dead- The two forces conjoin and that’s now what they “Know” they saw: President shot dead!- Now, why multiple shooters? To reinforce the “fact” that JFK was dead, knowing the Lone Nut scenario was designed to fail- So, the FBI lied about Oswald, as Hoover was instructed to do, and instead of a lone nut there was a conspiracy- That reinforces the “fact” that the president is dead, even if there was a feeble attempt at a cover-up- Now, everyone is scrutinizing the cover-up and not looking to verify that anyone was actually killed-
    A Threat Demonstration: The phrase “Revelation of the Method” should be retired in my opinion, humble tho’ it may be- What Dealy Plaza’s Grand Guignol theater piece was designed to do was threaten the public with a show of force- A threat has no resonance if you don’t know who is making the threat and why- That’s why I call it a “threat demonstration”- It’s not as grandiloquent as “Revelation of the Message” (cue sinister organ music) but its closer to the nature of the animalistic drive of these perps- The incremental exposure of the threat’s context is designed to let the truth out slowly enough without cueing a public revolt- Mission accomplished- The war economy needs to demonstrate threats periodically so as to sustain itself- 911 was one such threat, and then some- WAR WAR WAR!!! War porn is an even better term-

  13. Herge Degrelle

    In the case of JFK, the fakery was done on film with gory effects not allowed in most movies at that time but which became common by the late sixties and early 70’s. It was done on actual background film shot of a differently accomplished but similar murder and overlaid to show the shooting to be of different origin and have the brains blow out dramatically. So only Jackie and a few others would have to believe the fake video which they would take for real to replace their own somewhat different reality of what happened. They may have also had enough fake blood set up to spurt out to complement any real blood to scare Jackie away for the few minutes they needed to get the body away in an emergency situation. Some or even most of the non-Jackie people would have to be in on it but not her. The Zapruder 26 seconds would define the narrative later.

    Of course, if Jackie was in on it and just fooled her kids and family, then it would be even easier to do it but in that case she would have to have been in-on-it from before the marriage and that’s a hell of long time for an undercover agent to work. Either way, JFK himself is dead meat.

    In the case of 9-11, the fakery was done mostly on digital video with actors and only crude but “good-enough” approximations of the background scenery that most people do not realize is fake. Any real images they mixed in or used to base their fakery on was shot ahead of time and not on the scene. The real event on the scene was little more than the demolition of 9 buildings in a militarily blocked off area, probably behind smoke obscurants and where no one was allowed or even electronically able to photograph the demolitions.

    1. smj

      so your saying the jfk event was a real hit b/c jfk went off the rez?

      i have a hard time believing that that could even be an option for a completely manufactured stage prop.

  14. Herge Degrelle

    @”With my 911 goggles on, the encounter now appears to have been a final preparation for JFK to be tucked away on Ari’s unapproachable island fortress”

    lol

    What is this ? Conspiracy fantasy hour ? Did they tuck away Elvis’s post-Vegas drug-addicted lard-ass there too to keep them company ? How about Johnny Lenin to sing the 1970s post-hippie version of the communist internationale “Imagine” ? How about the “Reverend” Bang-two-hookers-at-a-time-behind-his-wife’s-back Martin Luther Plagiarist King ? A black “non-violent” revolutionary with a well-known KGB J-tribe communist handler called Stanley Levison named after a famous anti-semite ? Who would think of such a thing ? Could it be the same people that named Obama one letter away from Osama ? Hey !! Maybe they want it to be a “multi-cultural” island fortress of stressless Bolshy U-TOP-PEE-YEAH ? Peeing on the peons from higher altitudes ? Sounds like fun !!

    rense.com/general48/fraud.htm

    MLK’s supposed autopsy over here:

    www.autopsyfiles.org/

    To jump from the more-or-less proven 2970 “VicSims” of 9-11 (a lot of backlash to deal with from 2970 grieving families, no addresses on the only 249 death certificates, only 446 names on the SSDI by last count on Sept. 12, 2010 www.salem-news.com/articles/se… , this added to all the proof of simulated identities in the rest of the VicSims research) to the conclusion of saying, yeah, JFK and RFK, 2 brothers from a wealthy (estimated net worth of 850 million dollars) but long-ways-from-billionaire-much-less-trillionaire-bankster-elite family built on bootlegging liquor during prohibition would be hard to whack and deal with is unwarranted to say the least, whether or not the Zapruder film and all the rest of the footage of the “event” is fake.

    What so hard about whacking two multi-millionaires and getting away with it and then whacking the son of one of them and his wife 36 years later (1999) in a simple sabotaged airplane to make the reverse of 63 and add up to 9 ? Did JFK Jr. want both his wife and sister-in-law with him on the secret “Island Fortress” of plastic-surgery miracles ?

    carolyn-carolynbessettekennedy…

    Can the strongest team of lawyers and criminal investigators ever assembled on the planet given even an astronomical multi-million dollar budget to find out Kennedy’s “real killers” come up with any informatoin that the higher-up billionaires and trillionaires didn’t want to come out ? Of course not ~ ! And what if they could “prove” it too ? How would they charge the killers with conspiracy and murder who own the judges and courts that the lawyers would have to go through to charge them ?

    The answer to the question: why would they fake the films if they whacked the guy in public is

    1) They whacked the guy in front of an unknowing public but they didn’t manage to do it in as dramatic a fashion as they needed plus they wanted no evidence of who whacked him, so they faked films later to drive the fear-mongering drama home

    2) They had some expert shooter whack the guy in public but knew that whacking the guy in public and showing authentic film would never be as dramatic as they wanted or be able to be pinned on the patsy they wanted and set-up all the conspiracy rabbit-trails they wanted people to chase for 40 years , so they faked the films ahead of time and then pretended to have received it later through dramatic negotiations, chance, etc.

    3) They poisoned the guy and timed it for him to croak in front of an unknowing public with some fake blood splattered about and pretended to whack him with guns by shooting a few guns off target.

    4) They had the car go through the parade to their designated area and whacked him there away from the crowd with only a few people (including Jackie) knowing how he got whacked. Faked the movies for public and conspiritard “whodunnit” consumption. This scenario would have to assume Jackie in-on-it to the point of not exposing the fake film of the event as a false document of what really happened.

    The problem with the scenario of they faked the whole thing is that it would presuppose

    1) Jackie and JFK both being in on it and agreeing to separate after the event and for JFK to never see his kids or the rest of his family and friends again or never as himself. This is ridiculous. He would never agree to this unless they were never his family or friends to begin with which is quite an absurd length to go to in order to fake an event as easy as whacking one friggin’ wealthy multi-millionaire’s son and pinning it on a patsy. Same thing applies to RFK.

    2) It would presuppose the entire crowd being extras on a set in-on-it also who were either paid to act the parts and keep quite knowing if they talked they risked getting whacked and the comfortable life from their ill-gotten money. This second scenario would not be possible unless the first one, a completely pointless and unnecessary absurdity, was a reality. In the case of 9-11, NONE of the families were real or known before 9-11. In the case of JFK, they were some of the most visible people on the media.

    So, it’s obvious that entertaining “JFK was never killed” scenarios presupposes far too many absurd scenarios to make any logical sense while simply killing him and faking film to pin it on a patsy accomplishes the coup-d’etat and the blame away from the perps simply and effectively. No method acting needed by Jackie or anyone else and no method acting needed from JFK’s kids either.

    www.bing.com/images/search?q=j…

    img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007…

    Whacking the son of an anti-seemite who exposed Israel’s nuke program (whether or not you believe nukes-as-weapons are real) ? It must be them Black Poping Jezooits and those “Knights of Malta” setting up the Jews again !! What ‘evil genius’ they must have, these race of reptilian aliens !

    lol

    supereagle69.com/blog2/wp-cont…

    According to Harvey Klemmer, who served as one of Kennedy’s embassy aides, Kennedy habitually referred to Jews as “kikes or sheenies”. Kennedy allegedly told Klemmer that “[some] individual Jews are all right, Harvey, but as a race they stink. They spoil everything they touch.”[34] When Klemmer returned from a trip to Germany and reported the pattern of vandalism and assaults on Jews by Nazis, Kennedy responded, “Well, they brought it on themselves.”

    Whacking 2970 different people, on the other hand, presents 2970 potential big headaches and 2970 potential big headaches add up to far more than 1 huge headache from a wealthy family who front stooges for the elite, stooges excpected to play there part or be WHACKED off the stage, not threatened with silly “vacations” in far off fantasy “Islands.”

    1. ab Post author

      1) Jackie and JFK both being in on it and agreeing to separate after the event and for JFK to never see his kids or the rest of his family and friends again or never as himself. This is ridiculous. He would never agree to this unless they were never his family or friends to begin with which is quite an absurd length to go to in order to fake an event as easy as whacking one friggin’ wealthy multi-millionaire’s son and pinning it on a patsy. Same thing applies to RFK.

      Sorry, I don’t think it’s ridiculous. These people know what they’re getting into just like any Hollywool actor. They are paid a salary to do a job and they do it. It’s not absurd either to think the other family members could have been actors, but unlikely. Witness protection programs exist and work well I’m sure, so doing it for a high profile individual is just an extra layer of complication. Blue Moon’s theory is just as believable as any other I’ve imagined.

      2) It would presuppose the entire crowd being extras on a set in-on-it also who were either paid to act the parts and keep quite knowing if they talked they risked getting whacked and the comfortable life from their ill-gotten money. This second scenario would not be possible unless the first one, a completely pointless and unnecessary absurdity, was a reality. In the case of 9-11, NONE of the families were real or known before 9-11. In the case of JFK, they were some of the most visible people on the media.

      I doubt there were many if any eyewitnesses close enough on the shooting stretch. Anyone else would just see a commotion and hear noise. If someone did see something that didn’t square with the Zapruder film, then who are they going to tell?

      So, it’s obvious that entertaining “JFK was never killed” scenarios presupposes far too many absurd scenarios to make any logical sense while simply killing him and faking film to pin it on a patsy accomplishes the coup-d’etat and the blame away from the perps simply and effectively. No method acting needed by Jackie or anyone else and no method acting needed from JFK’s kids either.

      It’s not obvious to me. The parallels to 9/11 are many. Back in 1963 the lack of awareness to media fakery and the nature of government was probably running near 100%. Now it’s probably around 75%. Therefore anything done by authority would happen without question. It’s only now, 50 years later, that we can see the deception and question it more easily.

      Sometimes I think we’ll need a mass shooting every day for a month to make people aware. Once every 6 weeks isn’t working so far.

  15. Blue Moon

    Nixon was just as manufactured- He got out of the Navy (ONI?) after WWII and by ’46 was a congressman (He’d answered an ad in a California newspaper run by some GOP money men, looking for political recruits- They made him from the ground up) Reagan was the same way- He was an FBI informant and was best friends with Errol Flynn, a confirmed Nazi asset before and during the war- Dutch pitched for major corporations while making crap like “Bedtime For Bonzo” and by the sixties was properly positioned by his sponsors and acting coaches to become a future president-
    Speaking of phony baloney presidents, I think I know where JFK went after his “assassination”- You aren’t far off on Patagonia, Ab- In October of ’63, apparently Jackie spent a week with Aristotle Onassis on his yacht and at his private island, Skorpios, in the Ionian Sea (Onassis was apparently banging Lee Radzwill, Jackie’s sister)- The legend has always been that Ari and JFK were deadly rivals and Jackie was either being seduced or was being given a warning to take back to her husband- With my 911 goggles on, the encounter now appears to have been a final preparation for JFK to be tucked away on Ari’s unapproachable island fortress- In ’68, RFK is “killed” and Jackie marries Onassis- This gives a cover for why Jackie and the kids, Caroline and Jr., spend time on Skorpios (with their real father)- By the mid-seventies, Onassis is dead and the immediate family of JFK is secured in New York where they become icons of New York culture: Jr. playing at being a lawyer and roller skating to work shirtless (Good Grief!)- Jackie plays at being a book editor at Viking and Doubleday- Caroline marries a mystery man, a protégé of Buckminster Fuller, and by then I’ll wager JFK’s bone degeneration, Addison’s disease, probably finished him off- Where Bobby went is yet to be determined- The “historical” record indicates that Bobby and Ari really were hated enemies, but doesn’t that sound just like the cover story you’d expect-

    1. ab Post author

      Sounds like a good story to me. Since politicians are just actors, it’s really reduced my interest in any aspect of their lives. I won’t invest any thought or any emotion into their lives. I won’t even vote for them now! Quite the turn of events for my way of looking at things.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.