JFK’s secret society

Be the 1st to vote.

Our friend Chris breaks down the speech. JFK, an actor, was clearly trying to distract people away from the fact that he himself was part of the secret society that he was warning against.

6 thoughts on “JFK’s secret society

  1. lux

    I’m so glad you posted this, Ab. This is quite important, I think.

    The so called alternative media is constantly citing this speech as a testament to JFK’s good and anti-secret-society intentions when, in fact, just the opposite is true.

    The complete transcript of the speech is here:

    In this speech JFK clearly states:
    “This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President—two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.”

    1. ab Post author

      Lux, you’re welcome. Thanks to Chris. Maybe he can come on tonite and discuss. You’re most welcome too, btw.

      The Nutwork or Free Jewsuitsons or whoever is ultimately sticking it to us always seem to like to reveal their plans in plain site. Now that “plain site” may be in code or doublespeak, but it is still enough to satisfy their rules of engagement. It also must be a way to comply with the law. I’ve said many times that they hoaxes/psyops/media events all probably conform within the laws (that they make and exploit every loophole they create). It’s just another complex deception.

      1. JoeyZ


        Just think, I listened to “Dr. appeal to authority Fetzer” for almost
        ten years, bought two of his books on the subject (in 2007), never
        getting anywhere near the truth on this speech 🙁

        Indeed, Jim Fetzer, and his merry band of fellow Pied Pipers/ Gate-Keepers
        are sent to us to make sure we spend eternity chained to the wall of a cave
        perceiving shadows cast upon it – But, in Dr. Fetzer’s case the shadows
        would turn out to be… “HOLOGRAMS!”

    2. ArmunnRigh

      Indeed, however, the speech does mention “secret procedings” from a “system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations”. On the surface it referred to the opposer of the time, but it’s no different from Bush’s or Obama’s speeches about how the threat of the “terrorists” will require some of the freedoms to be put into challenge – all of them were in league with the “enemy” (which is also a fiction, albeit seeming very realistic).

      The real enemy is never one or the other side of a dichotomy, but among the third parties who wrote the script.

  2. JoeyZ

    Chris K,

    Thank you for taking me to school on this most heralded speech .
    For the last nine years, the “so called” truth community has lead us/ME
    to believe that JFK was “calling-out” the great shadow-elite/ government.
    So, THEY, silenced him! But, THIS, like almost all things in life turn out
    to be 180 degrees of what we are lead to believe. Again, thanks for giving
    me new eyes to see with on this one!

    My only lament is that this revolutionary video only had 45 views in 24

    As far as future videos on a related subject e.g.. anomalies in the ZAP
    film take one more look at it. Check out the skinny dude in the infield
    dressed in black, doing what appears to be a highly acrobatic maneuver.
    Hitting the deck… getting into a seated position. But in actuality, he is
    standing up! The background in this section of the film is moving in reverse.
    While the foreground, JFK and gang, are progressing forward. The other
    figures on the infield exhibit numerous perspective distortion anomalies.
    These other figures appear on closer inspection to be wandering aimlessly
    like zombies. Bluntly, there are layering issues and obviously –


  3. ArmunnRigh

    JFK’s “secret societies” speech is basically the same as this one.


    While in the movie “Network”, the presenter character exposes his own TV profession to the people watching TV, in the reality movie of JFK, the president character exposes his own power affiliations to the people who still believe that a president is naturally elected by them and has no secret influences.

    The contradiction is the same: both audiences reinforce the issue being exposed by giving it their time, credit and creedence and both characters depend on the very thing they are exposing.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.