Daily Archives: November 26, 2013

Dan Rather: CBS liar in chief

Be the 1st to vote.

Simon’s post further exposing the JFK hoax and Dan Rather got me thinking.

Dan Rather started his career being center stage and instrumental in selling the JFK hoax.

Next, watch American sweetheart TV anchorman DAN RATHER – as he relates what he knows of the(yet unreleased) Zapruder clip, only three days after the JFK drama. Enjoy! (and ask yourself if Dan Rather resembles in any way that Mike Walter of USA Today who is featured in my September Clues, relating how “he saw an American Airlines airliner hitting the Pentagon”…)

via JFK Zapruder: a proven fake • Cluesforum.info.

He then went on to being chief pitchman of the 9/11 hoax:

A few years later, he was fired for “speaking the truth” on Bush’s “military record”

So Dan gets away with telling the two biggest lies of the last 50 years, but is fired for reporting on a relatively minor or irrelevant (also manufactured?) event?

One might think there was a good reason for getting rid of Dan (he finally got a conscious and decided to spill the beans on the great deceptions?), but I doubt it.

I think it was simply a distraction, or another false event, illustrating the fake power struggle between government and media.

There is no power struggle. The two work hand and glove together; both are the two columns (I I) that support the ruling elite, the chessmasters (as Armunn so aptly named).

His final broadcast, in which once again, he invokes his biggest, and proudest, deception: 9/11…

…containing this priceless falsehood: “to my fellow journalists, in places where reporting the truth means risking all”.

The only positive thing about the decline of network TV anchors with the rise of the internet is this: at least Americans won’t be letting the deceivers into their living room on a daily basis any more. Their time has past. What a run they had, though, leading the deception for so long.




No tags for this post.

The sun never lies

Be the 1st to vote.

Drawing attention to the Zapruder film by re-releasing it as HD may not have been the best idea if they wanted to keep the myth alive. Not with Simon’s eagle fakery eyes.

Here’s the whole post:


I don’t think this will come as ‘shocking news’ to any readers of this forum – but I thought it was about time to conclusively expose the fakeness of the Zapruder clip, once and for all – in an incontrovertible manner and beyond appeal. Half a century of public belief in that piece of phony ‘footage’ is, in my mind, an amazing achievement by whoever put together the Zapruder fraud – so let’s be gentlemanly and recognize that those Zapruder fakers did a pretty good job, after all. We may only wonder why they chose a Russian jew, Abraham Zapruder, to play the role of the alleged “amateur videographer” who purportedly shot this short clip – which has fooled the world for 50-odd years…

As always, I’ll keep it simple – and will present only two animated gifs extracted from the Zapruder clip. The two of them are, in fact, all we need to establish the artificial nature of these universally (in)famous 27 seconds of ‘footage’.

By the end of the clip, we see the limousine passing between a foreground lamp post – and a backdrop which features a row of parked cars – and a skinny running man. But forget that odd-looking running man for now. What we need to focus on is that foreground lamp post, and how it remains perfectly aligned with the cabin of that pick-up van parked many yards behind it. This, in spite of the ‘cameraman’ performing a panning shot, which means he is moving his camera from left to right, as he follows the limousine. This total absence of parallax motion (between the foreground lamp post and the backdrop pick-up van) will simply not happen in the real world, and betrays / demonstrates the limits of 1960’s imagery compositing technology, which of course couldn’t properly simulate real world, 3-D environments: 

source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cZCHE… 

THE IMPOSSIBLE SHADOWS (the conclusive proof) 
If the sun in Dealey Plaza that day was in the upper right corner of the cameraman’s view (as ALL the shadows of bystanders and trees in the initial part of the clip clearly suggest), then these shadows should be consistent throughout the 27 second clip. The dead giveaway proving – beyond any shadow of doubt – that the ‘Zapruder film’ is fake comes in the very last part of the clip, where we see two individuals projecting shadows totally inconsistent with those seen in the initial part of the clip. The sun NEVER lies :

(Please do copy and diffuse the above animated gif far and wide. I claim NO copyrights to it!)

And this is my final take on the Zapruder clip: There is ONLY ONE rational explanation for these two individuals to cast entirely different shadows than those cast by the other people featured in this imagery: the Zapruder clip is a fake. It’s case closed. The long-debated Zapruder clip is a fraud – and there is no reason to believe that “parts of it” is real. It is a fraud from start to finish.

JFK was, most likely, never actually killed – but just removed from the scene to generate a global trauma amongst the world population which, a few years later, were to be fooled once again with the fairy tale of the Apollo program – and its six, successive & successful “moon landings” – an outlandish feat which JFK, with his charismatic speeches, had prepared everyone’s belief systems to accept. To be sure, MOST people of this planet bought into the alleged Apollo moon landings – and even today, a great many folks still believe in them. Let us never forget that it was JFK who paved the way to the public acceptance of the very silly moon landing hoaxes.

JFK Zapruder: a proven fake • Cluesforum.info.

Hoaxbusters on JFK

Be the 1st to vote.

Chris talks about JFK.

Myself, Jan Erik and Markus discuss the hubbub surrounding the John F. Kennedy persona 50 years and 3 days ago to analyse it from the Media Fakery angle.

We also discuss the power structure and “The Third Wave” by Alvin Toffler,



Origins of Conspiracy Theory

Be the 1st to vote.

This term didn’t appear by accident – it was contrived to help corral critical thinkers into a pen they may not have wanted to be associated with. John and Tom discuss a Cass Sunstein document on the topic.


On this edition of The Realist Report, we’ll be joined once again by Tom in Connecticut. Tom and I will be discussing Cass Sunstein’s 2008 public policy paper entitled “Conspiracy Theories” and other issues relating to psychological and information warfare.

via John Friend’s Blog: Search results for cass.