Drawing attention to the Zapruder film by re-releasing it as HD may not have been the best idea if they wanted to keep the myth alive. Not with Simon’s eagle fakery eyes.
Here’s the whole post:
CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF ZAPRUDER FAKERY
I don’t think this will come as ‘shocking news’ to any readers of this forum – but I thought it was about time to conclusively expose the fakeness of the Zapruder clip, once and for all – in an incontrovertible manner and beyond appeal. Half a century of public belief in that piece of phony ‘footage’ is, in my mind, an amazing achievement by whoever put together the Zapruder fraud – so let’s be gentlemanly and recognize that those Zapruder fakers did a pretty good job, after all. We may only wonder why they chose a Russian jew, Abraham Zapruder, to play the role of the alleged “amateur videographer” who purportedly shot this short clip – which has fooled the world for 50-odd years…
As always, I’ll keep it simple – and will present only two animated gifs extracted from the Zapruder clip. The two of them are, in fact, all we need to establish the artificial nature of these universally (in)famous 27 seconds of ‘footage’.
THE “2D CARTOON SCENERY”:
By the end of the clip, we see the limousine passing between a foreground lamp post – and a backdrop which features a row of parked cars – and a skinny running man. But forget that odd-looking running man for now. What we need to focus on is that foreground lamp post, and how it remains perfectly aligned with the cabin of that pick-up van parked many yards behind it. This, in spite of the ‘cameraman’ performing a panning shot, which means he is moving his camera from left to right, as he follows the limousine. This total absence of parallax motion (between the foreground lamp post and the backdrop pick-up van) will simply not happen in the real world, and betrays / demonstrates the limits of 1960’s imagery compositing technology, which of course couldn’t properly simulate real world, 3-D environments:
THE IMPOSSIBLE SHADOWS (the conclusive proof)
If the sun in Dealey Plaza that day was in the upper right corner of the cameraman’s view (as ALL the shadows of bystanders and trees in the initial part of the clip clearly suggest), then these shadows should be consistent throughout the 27 second clip. The dead giveaway proving – beyond any shadow of doubt – that the ‘Zapruder film’ is fake comes in the very last part of the clip, where we see two individuals projecting shadows totally inconsistent with those seen in the initial part of the clip. The sun NEVER lies :
(Please do copy and diffuse the above animated gif far and wide. I claim NO copyrights to it!)
And this is my final take on the Zapruder clip: There is ONLY ONE rational explanation for these two individuals to cast entirely different shadows than those cast by the other people featured in this imagery: the Zapruder clip is a fake. It’s case closed. The long-debated Zapruder clip is a fraud – and there is no reason to believe that “parts of it” is real. It is a fraud from start to finish.
JFK was, most likely, never actually killed – but just removed from the scene to generate a global trauma amongst the world population which, a few years later, were to be fooled once again with the fairy tale of the Apollo program – and its six, successive & successful “moon landings” – an outlandish feat which JFK, with his charismatic speeches, had prepared everyone’s belief systems to accept. To be sure, MOST people of this planet bought into the alleged Apollo moon landings – and even today, a great many folks still believe in them. Let us never forget that it was JFK who paved the way to the public acceptance of the very silly moon landing hoaxes.