Beatles/Sir Faul/Paul

Be the 1st to vote.

Clare’s obfuscation around is legendary, but she’s a little more Cl(e)are when it comes to her research. Around 1:11:00 of this broadcast, she lays out the 9/11 dates surrounding the whole switcheroo.

I am not convinced Paul would have to be killed. Like and the 9/11 vicsims, I don’t see the necessity. People disappear or keep quiet quite nicely with a regular stipend. Other than the Sergeant Pepper gory-death-cult 0;clues”, there’s really no evidence at all that anyone died. The murder/death is a red herring from the real point, that is to say the wholesale manipulation of media and personalities to control a population.




17 thoughts on “Beatles/Sir Faul/Paul

  1. richard benedict

    Blue Moon, can you elaborate on your suspicions of Micheal A, Hoffman? I too have been suspicious of him even since I began following him in the early 1990’s when he was in New York. Incidentally, look up the contract Brian Epstein had with the Beatles. Clause G said that Epstein could employ people to act as members of the Beatles, The original Beatles were replaced beginning in 1964, with doubles being switched back and fort until 1966, when the originals disappeared all together. Here are the original Beatles.

    1. Blue Moon

      Hoffman’s pathological racism is bad enough, but for me he drowns what scholarship he presents in hoary literary tropes- I believe the doctrine “Revelation of the Method” is his original, crafted from the kookery of madman James Shelby Downard- He’s also into the Khazarian hypothesis (which needs a great deal more research than the closet anti-Semites in the alt history scene are giving it) He has JFK actually being killed which supports his King/Kill narrative- (Superficially compelling as the Masonic symbolism spin is, I’m starting to smell a deep mass grave of rabbits underneath it) Finally, there is his association with the MSM touted “revisionist historian” David Irving and, of course, his support from Alex Jones- That’s enough for me…

    1. Tom Dalpra

      This is just plain silly. They’re the same guys. That the hidden hand was there, is taken as read, but I think this is at best, daft and at worst, deliberately stupid.

      1. Tom Dalpra

        I knew Maureen Starkey before she died of cancer in 1994.
        I used to hang out with her in Soho into the early hours drinking with her and her daughter Lee.

        Maureen was married to Ringo from 1965 until 1975. She had a real story to tell.
        I sat asking questions and listening intently to that sweet lady.

        You can believe what you want. I know what I think.

  2. Clare Kuehn

    Sadly, the thoughts above do not consider the reality of the psychology of grieving artists or the direct evidence for either replacement or death. Now, it is true that we do not have purely direct evidence of death; we do have many items planted to mourn in public (“clues”) while not acknowledging the situation (cover-up) at the same time, and we have John’s drawing, which is the most direct grisly and accurate and privately done and tenderly done and baleful thing of all. We also can reason that if Paul had been sent off “with a stipend” or something, per one person above, one would imagine him sipping mai tais somewhere, and the level of grief would not be so palpable in the others.

    And yes, the reality included a necessity of wearing false ears as well; these are easy to spot once one bothers carefully looking. Some have rectangular flaps over the cheek near the ear, maybe for when scars were fresh; some don’t, and have consistent deep shadowline through the tragus and lower ear in all angles of light, because they are sitting on top of the real skin.

    However, the most important thing to realize is the actual switch first. The forensic report is by two persons, both verifiable in other places as being doctors who have worked on cases of political significance, such as re-investigating Mussolini’s death.

    We also have the photos themselves which they used. As such, we can say:

    1. The mouths at rest are different widths.
    2. The teeth are different for a specific medical reason, which precludes normal orthodontic work as a solution (Paul’s were due to a small palate, since all teeth were slightly off-spaced, which shows in some photos and angles better, when lighting was conducive).
    3. The outer ears are radically different shapes in cartilage.

    AND one can see the difference, hear the difference in the two men if one is careful. (Actually, as a child I already saw it, but didn’t realize what the explanation was: “Paul” looked so different in most of the shots in MMT movie that I assumed the movie was made years later than the concert tours or something, but of course it wasn’t.)

    Adorno, etc., and the Crowley connection through the intel scene are a separate issue and linked to the story but not the basic interest from the forensics point of view.

    The person above who talks of how the Adorno claim to connections with the Beatles is entirely spurious is right, though Adorno himself is an interesting professor who has a squeaky clean history but was a German commie-connected man who always got plumb positions around the world and was likely tied to different intel utopia propaganda dreamers who developed into “public Mind Control” offshoots of different kinds by the 1960s, such as infiltrating music scenes and drug scenes and so on. Same with the Crowleyite stuff: it was in the scene in London, just as it was in the Laurel Canyon scene, along with all sorts of debaucheries, some quite sick, some more excessive than truly sick or evil. Sir Paul is into Crowley, and Crowley’s OTO is a mixed bag of enlightenment “free will” prayer “magic(k)” and darker ideas.

    But most of the “weirdness” in the Beatles stuff was because Paul was replaced because, by all grieving indications and commonsense logic, he died.……

  3. aralsea

    Yes, I believe its the same Paul McCartney. But he is a part of the culture weapon called The Beatle’s.
    The PID stuff is conspiracy candy just like building 7 and the grassy kno11.

  4. Tom

    Being from England and having grown up in a rock’n’roll band, I’m very ‘close’ to The Beatles. The drummer of a band I was with for ten years was McCartneys so-called ‘ marketing manager’ for that time. I’ve seen McCartney rehearsing. Maybe I’m too close to it, but listening to Kuhn talking about fake ears with Fetzer is not my idea of sane listening.

    In a world where we’ve come to understand the complete contrivance of so much, we have to question everything. I may be too close to this one, but the idea that McCartney was replaced in 1966 appears false to me. I’ve watched many hours of Paul McCartney over the years and always found him an engaging and intelligent interviewee ( sp!). His memories of the very early days appear totally credible to me and he’s always taken care to share various rare details.

    I’m not buying the replacement Paul idea at all. I think, however, the idea that they were controlled and used, should be obvious to us. The hidden hand in their music courtesy of Tavistock? Okay, that’s credible. The 12:8 atonal stuff put in around the time Epstein passed… the ( contrived?_ acid era…the 9/11 reference on Sgt Pepper? Wow…But, I’m not buying the idea that he was replaced with a doppelganger.

    False ears?

    Andrew Johnson likes the Italian ‘study’ of McCartney…and obfuscators Kuhn and Fetzer too…

    Is it a cover for the real story perhaps.

    Mysterious ‘death’ often implanted, with the built-in ‘benefit’ of scaring people away from really looking…

    What I do know is, that the man who calls himself Paul McCartney was a nice bloke to work for and he loved a joint.

  5. PeterShea

    isn’t it funny how Aldous Huxley of ‘a brave new world’ fame also ‘died’ on Nov.22nd 1963!?
    he was a tavistock man, alongside psychiatrist dr. Richard asher, the father of (original) paul
    McCartney’s girlfriend, jane asher.

    1. Blue Moon

      Peter-That link is quite a load and will take some time to assess- I will say up front I am highly suspicious of Michael A Hoffman- Asher has sometimes been offered as Paul’s handler during the Beatlemania period, and like Epstein and Jacobs, died before his time, somewhere around the time the PID myth was getting traction in the states and the Beatles were pretty much over- Lots of candy to munch on with the Fab Four-

  6. Blue Moon

    [Ab/et al- I posted this before but long after the post it was replying to so I don’t know if anyone saw it- If its reposting is slowing down traffic and needs to be removed, I wholeheartedly understand- I have heard Clare before on the PID beat but have not listened to this current posting (It may be an old show I have listened to) As you can see, for once I have a rather conservative position vis a vis fakery regarding this particular psy-op (Though psy-opish The Beatles certainly were)]

    I’ve been suspicious of this Adorno/Beatles take for some time- The only source for this angle is this “Doctor” Coleman- I do believe that the Beatles were a manufactured product and were tied intimately to the JFK psy-op- A few points:
    NBC on 11/18/63 ran a feature on the Beatles on the national news followed by CBS on the morning of 11/22/63- Jack Parr, the guy who preceded Johnny Carson on the Tonight Show, had clips of the Beatles shown to a more adult audience on 1/3/64 to prepare parents for their kid’s reaction once they arrived- Finally, Ed Sullivan had them on live on 2/9/64 and the audience responded as expected- What’s interesting to note in these news spots is the emphasis on teenage girls and their reactions- This, I maintain, is a classic example of patterned response placement , indicating to the vast audience of girls in America what the appropriate reaction should be- Teenage boys would then take the cue and adapt to this new male role model-
    This kind of patterning had happened a decade and a half prior to the Beatles’ arrival- Young Frank Sinatra had emerged after the war from Hoboken saloons to rise to the national spotlight- Bobbysoxers, the term for teenage girls at the time, were filmed for the newsreels, screaming for Frankie’s attention on stage and on the street- It was revealed years later that those screaming girls were paid to demonstrate their devotion so the cameras could sell this new sensation to a herd of like- minded girls- The boys would have no choice but to adapt to this new role model-
    The timing of the Beatles arrival was no coincidence- The biggest post-JFK distraction was the “British Invasion” that took over the music charts (Collaterally, this dampened, somewhat, the new infusion of black artists stationed on the charts) and then pop culture in all directions- When attacking a generation, you start with smiles to draw them in- Certainly the frowns were severe on the faces of American youth when JFK was taken out- It was a clean hand-off, like a relay race, from Walter Cronkite’s announcement of JFK’s demise to Ed Sullivan and The Beatles-
    As to the four mop tops themselves- The Beatles derived their name from a style of bands that they were but one example of- Beat Bands were all the rage; generally three guitars and a drummer- The most noteworthy Liverpool band at the time was Rory Storm and the Hurricanes with Ringo Starr on drums- Ringo was thought to be the best drummer in town and when real money selected the Beatles out of the morass of challengers, Ringo was purloined in ’62 to replace Pete Best-
    This sponsorship of The Beatles above all others might lead the narrative down several rabbit holes- My take is that these guys were vetted and were more than willing to trade in their jeans and leather jackets and quit trying to channel Eddie Cochran et al, (The rural country derived Elvis style of R&R) in exchange for a more urban and urbane form of R&R that would play well in cities and in the suburbs (and keep them from having to get real jobs)- That would require feminizing the band- Form-fitting identical suits, high-heeled footwear (Beatle boots which were made specifically for the band) longer hair with prominent bangs- Gone, too, were the wilder antics, the risqué repartee’, the “dirty” style of singing that the rockabilly types would engage in on slower, blues-derived numbers- Instead, tight, efficient, up tempo ditties punctuated in unison by a low bow from the waist as supplication to the fans-
    The real story of Brian Epstein is hard to piece together- The myths seem firmly entrenched- He stumbled upon them unattended and took them to the top- It’s interesting to note that not too long after the Beatles gave up touring, Epstein allegedly passed away under mysterious circumstances- A year later, their lawyer, David Jacobs also died- From concert sensations to studio musicians, this complete restructuring of the Beatle project over a two year span lines up with the transition from wholesome family entertainment to drug addled depravity of the youth culture in general-
    I believe the Beatles had a certain amount of guile, and a little talent- It has never been denied that George Martin was largely responsible for their records being listenable- It has never been denied that Martin would bring in other musicians from time to time to redo certain instrumental tracks- It’s never been denied that Martin scored whole musical passages, the most famous being the string quartet that backs Paul on Eleanor Rigby-The deliberate use of personal pro nouns in the titles and lyrics has never been denied- You/Me/We/Us/ She /He… were used to draw a personal connection between individual fans and the group- You know, programming! If the Adorno theory had any remote corollary it would be that Martin was the guiding hand for the music, not some oddball from parts east who had marching orders from a think tank like Tavistock- EMI, Martin’s employer, had direct ties to the military and were pioneers in radar and electronic sound devices with military application- If there is an intelligence entry way into the Beatles directly, I believe it is through George Martin-
    Could two yokels from a port town crank out masterpiece after masterpiece? Well, yes-ish, if a two minute and change pop song can be a masterpiece- I worked for years cranking out one photo-realistic-ish painting after another, selling hundreds of these small “masterpieces” to rich people who are by nature extremely stingy, unless prestige is on offer- Once an artist of any stripe creates a reusable template for his technique, he can crank out stuff like a machine- Paul, especially, made quite a bit of noise about just such song making protocols- He’d joke to Lennon at breakfast, “C’mon, let’s write a swimming pool”- alluding to the fact that their songs would buy them anything they wanted- I can relate to such cynicism- Believe me, at one point I had had it with painting gleaming glass effects and faint reflections off window panes, the technique that really moved my product, but the money was just too good to stop turning artistic tricks like that- At some point you stop worrying about art and just want to pay your bills with this “God given talent”-To this day, Paul, if that really is him, can’t stop hustling the audience- It’s just what he does-
    My convoluted conclusion is this: The Beatles were real people- They were selected and were quite happy to play along- They had grownups make their recordings, which they had a hand in- They were packaged and sold with cross continental and corporate coordination for a desired effect: Get people away from JFK and lead the youth out of effective social/political engagement and down a path of degradation- Yikes!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.