Good to be sane

Be the 1st to vote.

Dr. Barrett may be controlled or gatekeeping, but he does publish the occasional interesting article.

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

via PressTV – New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile.

h/t Banazir

No tags for this post.

2 thoughts on “Good to be sane

  1. khammadkhammad

    My two favorite quotes from the article:

    “… a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.”

    And the more hopeful,

    “…the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out.”

    Interestingly, there is a website that claims PressTV is really an Iranian propaganda tool.

    cartesianproduct.wordpress.com…

    Although this website is trying to debunk PressTV’s take on Wood and Douglas’s legitimate article, they, in fact, support it with their odd logic.

    Here is a quote from the anti-PressTV website:

    “Judge for yourself as to who is really involved in a conspiracy here – the propaganda station of a regime that deals with internal dissent by accusing enemies of “sorcery” or the governments of countries where politicians have to win votes and persuade people in societies with free media before they get power.”

    Funny thing is, PressTV website still has their comments open on this article. I just made one.

    The anti-PressTV website has the comments closed. Hmmm. What sounds more conspiratorial? Allowing open comments, or stifling them?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.