Thrashing at Mami’s

Be the 1st to vote.

I’m not afraid to post criticism, let alone a lambasting. This blog/audiocast is nothing more than one man’s journey through a world of . As a blog, it probably wouldn’t get noticed much, but the added dimension of audio seems to bring a great deal of attention, for which I am not always grateful. Audio was added as more of experiment with computer talk radio. I’ve listened to talk radio since I bought my first radio, and always wanted to try my hand at it.

I get quite the thrashing over at Mami‘s – where Delcroix posts the show. Either I’ve completely missed the obviousness of the jews’ total control over the world or my skepticism has hit quite the nerve with their crowd. Why would one person’s opinion cause such derision? Why would anyone care? How are they so sure that they’re right? Never once have I said or meant that I know who is in control. I can listen all day to their posted media, but I still am not convinced that their clear enemy is in charge.

While I am not convinced those saying  Jesuits or Jesuit-trained are in charge either, as past guest Robin Fisher has mentioned, I find the lack of discussion of this group puzzling and suspicious.

English: Roundel of the Sovereign Military Ord...

English: Roundel of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (Photo credit: )

There isn’t that much information on SMOM or some of the secret associations that most leading community and world leaders seem to be associated with, including 0;the jews”.  I do think that the Nutwork (a phrase I think Simon coined on is the best way to describe the  group of psychopaths that goes out of its way to remain deceptive and hidden.

Until I am convinced otherwise, I’ll stick with my theory that the of control and who runs things is and will remain as deceptive as the psyOp hoaxes that they promote — no matter how much (mami’s) shit I have to take.

As an aside, how many fakeologists were turned off or on with the last broadcast? I did get a few negative emails about the direction of the conversation, saying most prefer discussing the fake events than those who may be behind them.






Enhanced by Zemanta

11 thoughts on “Thrashing at Mami’s

  1. rickpotvin

    It was simple photo fakery analysis at Clues along with Ab’s “clean break” from “who did 9/11” (or what groups or cultures) that was the appeal of the Simon and Ab angles for me. Logic and photographic reality are not bound by who exceeds them. It’s pure reasoning without culture. Reason is not culture bound, it’s universal. The clues/fakology approach represents a higher universal reality. The rap song “You can’t tuch this” comes to mind. Nobody can touch it– in other words, it’s an approach beyond reproach. The ONLY possible critique MUST meet the clues/fakology approach on it’s own level of merit. A ghostly jet going into the building like a cartoon, or a collapse-sequence from top to bottom leaving nothing but paper– these are pure visual physics cartoons without any requirement for identifying anyone at all. I spent a good year in Judy Wood Land and then found for the first time in my life– a revelation of nuclear power as dumpload systems to keep gas/coal generators running overnight — that made physics sense. In a burst of revelation, it was as if I had a positronic brain whose connections went through a cascade instantly transforming my outlook… an AHA! experience. It look longer for me to cascade through the shuttle program but I’m there now– on the side of the hoax. It doesn’t matter as much to me who perpetrates the hoax as much as having the mind expanding experience of realizing the hoax– like seeing in 3D for the first time. By sharing that experience, exposing the perps whoever they are would seemingly take care of itself without further effort.

  2. smj

    they probably don’t know what to make of you. to people who have been completely swept up in a single narrative for so long you must seem quite the epistemological coup de main.

    1. ab Post author

      My French expressions are bad…please translate, although I get the idea.
      Pretty sure many listeners have similar views as me…if not, speak up people!

      1. smj

        coup de main: a sudden action undertaken to surprise an enemy.

        you blind-sided the poor devils at mami’s collective by getting directly to the epistemological heart of the matter. you rendered their fundamental narrative irrelevant by asking a simple question– just how deep does the dupery run?.

        that probably stings a little since they have been so publicly all in on ‘ it’s the jewz’.

        the thing is you are not doing it out of spite. you’re not calling them nazis or suggesting that they are repressed shylocks. they are confused (that is if they are sincere); they have no effective rebuttal. there is no place for their type of fundamentalism in this very uncertain world.

        as for who’s really running shit. this serf doesn’t have enough data to even have a clue. i suppose in theory there could be as few as one or two people atop this giant pile of bullshit we call civilization. would the terms ‘jew’ or ‘gentile’ even apply at such rarefied levels of the hustle?

        1. ab Post author

          Thanks. This explanation helps me greatly. I don’t bother accusing them of being shills or just completely convinced due to the material laid out for them — I really don’t know and it frankly doesn’t matter either. Their malice at those that disagree with them, however, isn’t helpful and is itself suspicious.

  3. Blue Moon

    Sounds like a lot of belly aching at The ‘Shit- All the closet Joos over there are acting like closeted gays- The bashers are always the loudest with the anti-fill in the blank caterwauling to keep from accepting themselves as who they really are- Some people need an impregnable paradigmatic corral to keep it together because of some self-loathing aspect of their personality (self-loathing is actually a well- worn familiar of Jewish identity)- Aside from themselves and their family, I wonder if any of these hidden Hasidim have ever met any real Jewish persons or, honestly, any of those devious, manipulating, hook-beaked Molochs with sacks of gold in their pockets and vials of infant blood around their necks? Doubtful given that this cartoon version of a Jew existed only in the feeble imaginations of the four stooges: Hitler/Himmler/Goering & Goebbels- (And the Tsars, of course…)

  4. Tom

    Mami’s Shit…oh dear…I can’t read from there for long, I get a headache. The blacks and greens…ugh.

    Someone said you were like Dallas Goldbum abster. Congrats! haha what a joke. Pathetic and funny.

    I was quite surprised some months back when you’d just posted some guys’ blog with thoughts on ‘The Joos Done it’.…

    I read it, thought it made some sane balanced points and was quite surprised to see that several people had voted their extreme dislike of it. Funny, I read it as a rational, sane, piece. It was hardly provocative. It fingered ”The Jews” if you like. It completely accepted the ”Jewish hand”, whilst making some good points like ‘it wasn’t all the Jews that did it’.

    To one of the detractors, the piece read as if it said ”The Jews Didn’t Do It”. That was kammad’s objection – he took the time to explain to me on the thread. I like kammad. I like the intelligent things he says in general. He contributes positivity in general…but on this gentle (it seemed to me) post, he felt moved to call it ”very poor”…

    Wanda…now there’s a gal. She’s excellent to talk to. She has knowledge and passion. I like her as well. I learn things from her sometimes.

    I do wonder though what people’s motivation is in their studies. Are they driven to find their truth by a certain amount of anti-religious fervour? They are sincere in their anti Jewishness. The thing is, it’s a load of old meaningless bollocks really isn’t it? Religion and all that.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.