Simon gets right to the brass tacks on what main motive is ultimately behind this wildly deficient story and all its idiotic alternative branches.
Just guessing (and hoping) – but I think what Pug finds ‘interesting’ in that idiotic Jim Stone(-head) article is, well, its sheer idiotic nature. I cannot help but feel that one of the prime motives for the Nutwork to relentlessly keep concocting silly stories such as this latest, “mysterious passenger-plane disappearance” (chock-full of what I like to call ‘conspiracy candies’ / or, red herrings if you will) – is to ridicule and discredit ALL independent researchers (such as ourselves) – in the eyes of the public / the masses.
Think about it: at this time, there can hardly be a higher priority for the Nutwork to keep reinforcing the (already long-‘popularized’) notion that “you cannot trust ANYTHING that you read on the internet”. Thus, they feel a need to flood the web with asinine conspiracy theories such as this Jim Stone article – actually published on BEFORE IT’S NEWS.com which (PLEASE NOTE) mixes UFO garbage with “fake photoshopping” clues…
Extracts:
Case Closed: HIJACKED by AWACS
“ONE THING, and it looks like a UFO (as some have speculated) only it’s attached to a boeing jet – the antenna on a U.S. Air Force AWACS plane. The fact that this missing jet vanished from civilian radar yet remained visible on more robust military radars proves well enough for me that this indeed was an AWACS hijacking, just like we saw on 9/11 where AWACS planes were seen on video observing if not controlling the crashes into the twin towers.”
(…)
“In this scenario, we now have: The plane did a u-turn and flew the other way for a now admitted full hour. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Obvious fake photoshopping of “terrorists”. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Cell phones still ringing, which would only be possible with a safe landing. THAT supports the Awacs story
Missing black boxes. THAT supports the Awacs story (the plane is obviously intact).”
(…)
“If the plane is now “found” in pieces it will mean “they” gave up on the B.S. story line and decided to ditch it somewhere rather than use it on the Petronas towers or the Sears tower.”
beforeitsnews.com/alternative/… … edium=feedI’m afraid that we should expect a long string of ridiculous “private internet investigators” to emerge in the future – with the specific mission of poisoning the well of sensible / rational research performed on sites such as ours. The
only hijacking going on here – is that of the people’s ability to discern the wheat from the chaff. “Ace Baker” and “Dallas Goldbug”, to name but two, are prime examples of this ongoing Nutwork strategy.
www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic….
Most commonly asked question asked by non aware people asking me about this hoax is “but why would they do it?” always evokes this clip from my memory bank
