Why badly fake the MH370 flight at all?

Be the 1st to vote.

Simon gets right to the brass tacks on what main motive is ultimately behind this wildly deficient story and all its idiotic alternative branches.

Just guessing (and hoping) – but I think what Pug finds ‘interesting’ in that idiotic Jim Stone(-head) article is, well, its sheer idiotic nature. I cannot help but feel that one of the prime motives for the Nutwork to relentlessly keep concocting silly stories such as this latest, 0;mysterious passenger-plane disappearance” (chock-full of what I like to call ‘conspiracy candies’ / or, red herrings if you will) – is to ridicule and discredit ALL independent researchers (such as ourselves) – in the eyes of the public / the masses.

Think about it: at this time, there can hardly be a higher priority for the Nutwork to keep reinforcing the (already long-‘popularized’) notion that “you cannot trust ANYTHING that you read on the internet”. Thus, they feel a need to flood the web with asinine conspiracy theories such as this Jim Stone article – actually published on BEFORE IT’S NEWS.com which (PLEASE NOTE) mixes UFO garbage with “fake photoshopping” clues…


Case Closed: HIJACKED by AWACS
“ONE THING, and it looks like a UFO (as some have speculated) only it’s attached to a boeing jet – the antenna on a U.S. Air Force AWACS plane. The fact that this missing jet vanished from civilian radar yet remained visible on more robust military radars proves well enough for me that this indeed was an AWACS hijacking, just like we saw on where AWACS planes were seen on video observing if not controlling the crashes into the twin towers.”
“In this scenario, we now have: The plane did a u-turn and flew the other way for a now admitted full hour. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Obvious fake photoshopping of “terrorists”. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Cell phones still ringing, which would only be possible with a safe landing. THAT supports the Awacs story
Missing black boxes. THAT supports the Awacs story (the plane is obviously intact).”
“If the plane is now “found” in pieces it will mean “they” gave up on the B.S. story line and decided to ditch it somewhere rather than use it on the Petronas towers or the Sears tower.”
beforeitsnews.com/alternative/… … edium=feed

I’m afraid that we should expect a long string of ridiculous “private internet investigators” to emerge in the future – with the specific mission of poisoning the well of sensible / rational research performed on sites such as ours. The

only hijacking going on here – is that of the people’s ability to discern the wheat from the chaff. “Ace Baker” and “Dallas Goldbug”, to name but two, are prime examples of this ongoing Nutwork strategy.


Most commonly asked question asked by non aware people asking me about this hoax is “but why would they do it?” always evokes this clip from my memory bank

4 thoughts on “Why badly fake the MH370 flight at all?

  1. rickpotvin

    Ab & fans– Why am I one of the very few posting comments out of hundreds of listeners?

    2. Methane gas bubbles can sink ships and planes and pull them to the bottom of the sea. The conflicting stories might be the result of the airline industry trying to keep this fact under wraps.

    More on this at my forum here.

    1. Tom

      Methane can spoil a beautiful moment, like a sinking plane. I’m thinking of course, of the fart ejected whilst receiving oral sex.

      On a serious note, fair point Rick. There’s hardly a buzz around here about it. Personally I haven’t really looked at it, at all. I seem to have absorbed it by osmosis perhaps, let it seep into my system. For a change.

      My take right now is that it’s a complete fake and there’s a whole load of bullshit being thrown at it. Talking details right now might be ‘arguing the toss’.

      Simon Shack was on the chat the other night and Tim put up this post from clues, as well as a couple of other interesting ones. It seems like a glut of ludicrous theories have been chucked at this one from the start in a kind of Dallas Goldbum effort at obfuscation. It seems fashionable. Maybe just come out with a whole load of counter-intuitive crap from the start. That’ll keep it weird and create an environment of distrust in alternative theories.

      This, and ‘it’s completely fake’ was where I was at. When I saw you’d suggested ‘it may not be fake after all’ I was intrigued.

      I tried to follow the link regarding the methane gas and the airlines wanting to suppress this information.
      I’m tired and I couldn’t find it.

      So again, good Sir, I haven’t looked at it. It smells like shit to me though. The methane. Now remember, I’ve passed wind while a beautiful girl has been giving me a blow job. If you smell shit, it doesn’t always mean it’s bad. HONEST!

      I’m open to anything.

      However, as it stands, the airlines can try and suppress their methane as much as they want, but there’s no doubt here that they’re full of shit.

      NOTE: Having seen your subsequent post, I see we have common ground now 🙂

  2. rickpotvin

    If you read through Jim Stone’s piece, there’s much more there than nutwork defamation of fakologists. This may not be fake afterall.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.