ep103-Allan Weisbecker

Be the 1st to vote.

Showtime: Sunday, May 4, 2014 15:00 EDT

I talk with Allan about his latest movie Water Time

Download

Allan’s Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/user/911TruthF…

Allan’s website: www.banditobooks.com/

Michael Mann

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_…

Walter – a world class photographer

Truth Castle

fakeologist.com/2013/11/02/tru…

 

No tags for this post.

11 thoughts on “ep103-Allan Weisbecker

  1. Pingback: ep142-Fakeologist Radio Raw | Fakeologist.com

  2. Pingback: ep112-Unreal | Fakeologist.com

  3. smj

    there is a clumsy caricature of a shylock running about. his name is ken. he is the hoaxers’ bagman.

    he is a busy fellow. he’s known as the pay czar by the monied class. he made sure those pesky bankers didn’t take too much bonus money. that is, after they had strong-armed congress to the tune of 700 billion.

    besides his pay czar role, he ran the bp fund, the hokie fund, the penn state settlement, the batman fund, the boston bombing fund, the sandy hook fund. he also helped to determine the market value of the zapruder fake film and he also dabbles in some holohoax legislation.

    this fearless fraudster was once the chief-of-staff for the lion(son of a bitch) of the senate.

    here’s ted and ken at the jfk library- the jfk library from the boston bombings. www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWk92y…

    the fuckin’ kennedys are an acting troupe. they are the first family of fakery. the scope of their bullshit can only be rivalled by the nehru-gandhis.

  4. UNreal


    very interesting part of the interview on the JFK “assassination”

    in my personal view there are some aspects that are quite significant that would point to a fake incident and that is less discussed.
    -if we look back at Lincoln’s assassination we are placed in the the same circumstance of a crowded space, in Lincoln’s case a dark theater and in Kennedy’s place in bright daylight in front of people. from a magicians standpoint the JFK act is harder as there are eyes to see, whereas for Lincoln it was only ears to hear.
    -both assassinations are reinforced by a huge crowd as to ascertain the “realness” of the event. this is what the magician would term the “pledge”; an ordinary event no-one can question.

    in both JFK & Lincoln’s case the next phase debuts with a very real sound-effect. the reason behind this i suspect is the fact that we are directly moved to our most primitive instincts by such trauma: no reflection just action.

    -when the stage is set, the ordinary is turned into something extraordinary the “Turn” is on and we are overwhelmed by what is set upon us.

    normally, after the “turn” is on, a stage magician would head for the “wow” factor and bring JFK or Lincoln back in return for huge applauds,,,

    the trick of the psyOp in my view is the non inclusion of “the Prestige”,,,

    “Every great magic trick consists of three parts or acts. The first part is called “The Pledge”. The magician shows you something ordinary: a deck of cards, a bird or a man. He shows you this object. Perhaps he asks you to inspect it to see if it is indeed real, unaltered, normal. But of course… it probably isn’t. The second act is called “The Turn”. The magician takes the ordinary something and makes it do something extraordinary. Now you’re looking for the secret… but you won’t find it, because of course you’re not really looking. You don’t really want to know. You want to be fooled. But you wouldn’t clap yet. Because making something disappear isn’t enough; you have to bring it back. That’s why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part, the part we call “The Prestige” -Christopher Priest-

    1. UNreal

      in regards to Kennedy assassination i believe it was arranged for the motorcade to be held in front of a huge crowd purposefully, and that the “turn” was performed in the absolute end of his tour as to conveniently join the highway for a quick escape.
      after a strategically placed sound-effect was set in action the crowd was “scared” away from the scene as no-one runs toward a scary sound,,, this is probably why they placed the sound on the Grassy Knoll & School Book Depository Building as this would lead the majority of the crowd from Dealey Plaza away from the car & JFK.
      they probably made sure that all the crowd close to the road were assets or actors, everyone else would then be unable to see whatsoever,, ‘mary Muchmore’, the “three tramps”, all the alledged “witnesses” deaths etc. are all good indications that no credible person ever was close to the scene, and why would they be if this was all planned ?
      In the mayhem caused by the sound, the car that did not ever stop imo as JFK could then speed away unseen from general public probably covered by Jacky as a back-up plan.
      The film may have been made before or after, but what is sure is that JFK was alive when he was announced dead later that day.

  5. FauxCapitalist

    Ab, you said that on a scale of 1 to 10, you’d place it at a 9, your view that nuclear power is a hoax.

    But there are many important differences between nuclear power and 9/11.

    Nuclear power is purportedly being used by many countries, with thousands of scientists, under largely civilian, not military control.

    Has a single physicist come out questioning the existence of nuclear power, let alone published a paper? With 9/11, we have professionals questioning the purported physics of 9/11, even if the leadership of AE 9/11Truth is questionable, and there are so many inconsistencies with the official story and purported footage.

    I’d like to hear your evidence in a future show or post that puts your doubt of nuclear power on par with the voluminous documentation that has been amassed regarding 9/11, because based on a comparison I could come up with, I think I’d end up with a score of barely above 0 for nuclear power being a hoax, with 9/11 at a 10.

    1. ab Post author

      Yes I know my “evidence” is flimsy at best. I know I am on shaky ground. I was really extrapolating from the concept that 9/11 and JFK were well executed hoaxes that fooled 99% of the population. Science, specifically physics and nuclear, lose 99% of the population. This is similar to the past with the priest class. Only they had the language and the “knowledge” to translate God’s word. So they really don’t have to work hard to fool the majority. I really don’t even think most physicists that work in the nuclear plants (how can we verify many or any do?) get near the mystery rods. Who would physicists speak out too? They would lose everything and be labeled heretics. The power of groupthink is immense.

  6. Tom Dalpra

    ‘Good disinformation has to have crazy attached to it’ – Videre Licet
    Allan’s new film subtitle is – ‘Diary of a Mad Man’…I dunno…

    He wrote scripts for Miami Vice? So he should fully understand about social engineering through plot lines in big hit series like that then? That would have been interesting to hear about, but no word on that.

    If he just can’t accept the idea that the Kennedy assassination could have been a complete hoax, then how seriously can we take him? It may not have been, but it obviously could have been with what we now know. ”The limo stopped, as witnessed by 31 people’. AND? pfff

    I liked Allan already. The Walter interview, I thought, was great and the Apollo 13 expose was very good, but he wasted
    time arguing about nothing a bit and showed himself to be ,apparently, a little naive.

    The powers that be are perpetrating evil in ‘biblical proportions’ according to Allan. Well, that’s just what Alex Jones says. Give me a break. That’s an old script too.

    So he smuggled dope and wrote scripts for Hollywood? He is the elite then? ! Haha!

    I dunno. He’s made this film and he’s looking to sell half his land for a cut-price $40,000 to help finance it. How much do you need? What’s he doing with it?
    Hollywood player ( you know, one of those perhaps, superficially legitimate ones) Sean Penn, bought the rights to his latest book, which meant he could buy the land in the first place.
    His mate called him a modern day ‘knight’.

    Hey, he said some nice things. It was interesting.

    He seems a nice guy, but I can’t help feeling dubious about him.
    If he’s joined this site as was mentioned, he can answer for himself.

  7. Tom Dalpra

    I was interested to hear Allan. I’d enjoyed the ‘Walter interview’ film and the Apollo 13 expose he did.
    I didn’t know much about him, but I liked him already.

    I’m not sure now. I want to like him and he said some nice things but…too much of the time was spent on disagreeing on basic points. ‘Surely this guy isn’t that naive?’ I thought.
    ‘So all the doctors were actors?’ he asks almost scornfully, regarding the Kennedy assassination when Ab said he thought it was all fake.
    I

    Dope smuggling and Miami Vice script writing? He is ‘them’ isn’t he?

    It does say he’s a knight on his website.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.