I don’t have much doubt that the Lady Di death was just another media hoax. After listening to some of the details of the whole ridiculous story and its follow-up 220;trials” in this audio, I have even less doubt.
After seeing fakeologist PShea ad-hominim-ed over at the Fetzerblog, I even more convinced that PShea and I are on the same fakery page. Not sure why Peter bothers posting over there – it’s akin to putting your head in a meat grinder. No gain and all pain.
Other random thoughts on the case:
Lady Di was very much a Kennedy type character in this psyOp scenario “the humanitarian princess”. She was busy doing good for human kind, going up against the establishment, mixing it up with a Muslim: all anti-Anglo American empire type activities. It is for this reason that she had to be “removed”.
Were dopplegangers used to play Lady Di? Much like Michael Jackson, her appearance changes are more likely due to switching of look-alikes. Why are people more likely to accept or discuss radical surgery, as opposed to famous people having doubles for security and convenience reasons, as well as logistical reasons? Would the exposure of the widespread use of dopplegangers help expose other psyOps more easily?