I’ve heard it twice that Simon has done a 180 on building 7, saying that perhaps the collapse footage of Building 7 was real. I heard it once on Fetzer’s latest shill show here and on the latest hoaxbusterscall.com with Brian Stavely here. It’s quite clear to me that Simon has not done any reversing of his position on the collapse footage, which was of course the crux of Richard Gage’s travelling clown show.
Here’s my original post here on Simon’s theory, which I think could be very close to what actually occurred.
I am reposting the above section of my above “SMOKESCREEN” post – for those with short attention span and poor reading skills who completely missed my point, such as Brian Staveley. Here’s what Brian is now circulating on the internets:
Brian Staveley wrote (in a group e-mail exchange):“Simon Shack of September Clues has always said all the video from 9/11 is fake! If you even suggested ANY real 9/11 imagery you would be banned from his site. It happened to many people. I personally was attacked for suggesting not all the video was fake. Well now he has done a complete 180! I wonder why? Will he unban people?? lol He goes on to say that tower 7 was demolished to cover up the evidence of the smoke machines. He even says there is real video of 7 and of the smoke plume,etc . Something we have always suggested. Listen for yourself. This was on his appearance on the Ab Irato show about 3 weeks ago.”
I am now fully satisfied that we did well to ban Brian Staveley from this forum. Whether he is a shill or not doesn’t really matter – since he clearly is too damn stoopid to participate / let alone contribute in a cogent manner to the all-important image fakery debate.
As I’ve stated before, the 9/11 military media hoax psyOp has two pillars: media fakery and simulation, and psyOp hoax management. The nuances of the psyOp hoax are difficult to sort out. Because I have no doubt that Simon’s deconstruction of the 9/11 psyOp is the closest to the truth, his position will logically get the sharpest attacks while paradoxically receiving the least amount of attention.
Is it any wonder that to fully understand 9/11, you have to study it for years before you can get a grasp of the enormity of the operation? Do you detractors now see why I’ve devoted a blog and radio program to it?
Here are two animated gifs showing the smoke gushing out (*and back into! )of WTC7 (as shown on TV):