Daily Archives: March 5, 2015

Ep27-KHam Radio

Be the 1st to vote.

Guest: Delcroix and Rollo

Topic: The Irish Potato Blight


What was really going on with the so called Irish Potato Famine? We listened to some audio with Chris Fogarty who discusses how the media at the time was manipulated to hide the fact that Ireland and her people were being looted.  From the London Records Office, British regiments’ Daily Activity Reports of 1847 show exactly what was taken from Ireland by gunpoint from British soldiers in one day, from one port:

From Cork harbor on one day in 1847 the AJAX steamed for England with 1,514 firkins of butter, 102 casks of pork, 44 hogsheads of whiskey, 844 sacks of oats, 247 sacks of wheat, 106 bales of bacon, 13 casks of hams, 145 casks of porter, 12 sacks of fodder, 28 bales of feathers, 8 sacks of lard, 296 boxes of eggs, 30 head of cattle, 90 pigs, 220 lambs, 34 calves and 69 miscellaneous packages.     http://www.irishholocaust.org/thefoodremoval

No tags for this post.

From a 9/11 email

Be the 1st to vote.

From a public email list, a good comment by El Buggo (who I’d like to interview here if he’s reading)

Dear Ed, if I may; why are you so inconsistent? I understand you are fine with the faked passengers part, but that they just expanded the same trick to the WTC victims should be outside the sane world? They faked 15 gorillon jews burned in gas ovens, so why should it be so incomprehensible that they faked a few thousands? As you may understand, it is the perception of the victims that is important, not the victims themselves. Fake victims are just as good as real victims.

There is a lot of support for that no one was killed 911. First of all, where is the official victim list? And what is the correct number supposed to be? We don’t even know this. We don’t have a list, we don’t have a number, and we don’t have the names. This is really basic stuff!

You will only find about 2 photos of every reported victim. Many have even less, and a few some more photos. Why are there never any new photos published by the million reported family members on Facebook every anniversary? One reason is they don’t have the real thing (victims and victims family members), and they don’t care to fake it either.

They simply cannot get their story right. Recently it was discovered that the 911 Memorial Museum had Photoshopped several of the reported victims on their own website – undeniable proof: www.septclues.com/VICSIMS/AAA_… – Why did they fake it? Because they don’t have the real thing of course.

This is really interesting: The number of reported family members at the 2009 Memorial Service was about 11 – scroll down to photo # 34, and cunt them yourself: www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009… – Shouldn’t there have been about 10000 family members at these memorial services? And here we only have 11? Why so few on the 2009 Memorial Service? They don’t have the real thing of course. 11 was what they needed for a photo op.

No one even slightly skeptical to the official story has ever been able to get hold on 1 of these 10000 reported victim family members for an interview. Not even Uncle Fetzer himself has been able to locate even 1 – not even 1. Why not? Because they don’t have the real thing? Or are they all shy?

If they faked the passengers and not the WTC victims, wouldn’t those real WTC victims family members have become slightly suspicious to that there were no passenger victim family members to be seen in all the Facebook groups and conferences or whatever? The real victim family members would never notice this? There isn’t any Facebook group for the 911 victims family members al all. Why not? Because they don’t have the real thing of course.

Would be several advantages for the 911 operation management with 100.00% fake victims. First off, no one would become involved in a conspiracy to murder with no statute of limitations. I can assure you Diane Sawyer and Dan Rather and the rest of the MSM Team for Special Operations appreciated that. All other possible crimes that day have now expired, maybe with the exception of treason. Recruitments to the operation would become easier when no one was killed in the operation. If even 1 was killed, the 911 operation management could expose themselves to blackmail, and everyone involved could become involved in a conspiracy to murder, with no statute of limitations. Could have become a mess with a real FBI murder investigation into this operation. With no murders, no real murder investigations. Would also have created a mess if some real and angry banksters family members with access to uptown lawyers had sued them in court for whatever. Could have become a real mess. 100.00% fake victims would give them 100% control on the victim part of the story too, without having to argue with those real victim family members.

Re the jumpers: There are no jumpers shown on the “live” news broadcast – 0.00. According to the reports, there should be raining with jumpers that day. But even Granny understand that they faked the jumpers part too: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkvIV5… – www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QRsi4…

I find JohnF much too moderate when he just questioning if anyone died on 9-11. It is about as sensational if I should questioning the 18 gorrillion jews they put into gas ovens. However, it took me about 3 years to move from probably a few real victims 911 to no real victims 911. So we should give him some more time to reach the obvious conclusion, I think. I recognize 2 other people on this list with the same world view as me, that no one died and no one was hurt in the 911 media Hollywood operation, so that is about 30% or so here.

The victim part of the story is really crucial. That is part of the basis for the perpetual War on Terror and much of all this other nonsense we have to go along with. So the gigantic controlled opposition will fiercely protect and defend this part of the story – that should be expected.

By far the most important point there is on the 911 operation, is the ALL the national news networks lied to us, and their top Gov agents backed up those lies. The tribe who control the national media also have total control on the election process and are always able to pull to the top their own controllable puppet and hand him the keys to the White House. Then they can place their agents in the Gov wherever they want or need. The US is a media occupied territory. Don’t expect Uncle Fetzer and his controlled opposition ghetto to tell you about this though. He is one of their agents under deep cover and their last defense regarding the victims part of the 911 story and the media complicity in ALL these operations.

Aviating yours, if any.



Simon adds in:

Dear EB,

I think that what Ed Hendrick is concerned about (“to be discredited in the eyes of other people”) may derive from his own, past experience.

See, the author of this old article linked below (dated March 3, 2009) clearly ridicules Ed  Hendrick for his fanciful contention that ” Charges were planted on the buildings and detonated by our government — resulting in the deaths of thousands of people (…)”


To be sure, it would be quite outlandish to believe that the lives of thousands of white-collar brokers / bankers / Wall Street folks would have been  ‘sacrificed ‘ by the American government – in order to pursue their evil plans… It makes no sense whatsoever. It is well and truly laughable for anyone to believe that such a dire mass-murder scheme would possibly have been a viable proposition – what with all the high-profile folks in the media / the military / and the government itself – whose participation in the sham was, of course, essential.

Here’s the “Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth” website, by the way: mp911truth.org./ (where Ed-the-Truther-Dentist comes from).

NOTE: It is clearly an offspin of  ae911truth.org./  (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth)
– and another offspin of  rl911truth.org./ (Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth)

A bon entendeur 🙂

Simon Shack

My personal take on the 9/11 “victims” question:
DECONSTRUCTING 9/11 : septemberclues.info/deconstruc…

No tags for this post.