Judy Wood seems to have been revived in 2015, mainly by flat-earth investigators David Weiss and all those that come into contact with him (Jeran, Bob, Morgile).
I first heard her on Fetzer, and could never understand her point of view or theory (she apparently didn’t have a theory). I was as confused as Fetzer purportedly was.
Upon discovering on cluesforum.info that occam’s razr, as applied to 9/11, indicates all the imagery was created in Hollywool, like any other movie, I immediately dismissed any non-theory that Judy proposed – since it was based on fabricated footage. No need to dig into mythical weapons if all the destruction was created in a studio.
Upon investigation, there doesn’t seem to be a central place explaining or discrediting Dr. Wood anywhere on the ‘net. Only old guest OBF has a few pages on her. Therefore I’ll open this post for anyone who wishes to provide links to help develop a place for those stuck on Judy to become unstuck – and move on from the Wood deception.
On re-reviewing my original 2008 article, it is abundantly clear to me that at the time I had been far too kind to Professor Wood.Forgetting, for the moment, the 220;crimes” previously exposed in parts 2 and 3 of this current report, these days it sticks out to me “like a sore thumb” that she has, at the same time, shown a complete disregard for basic, run-of-the-mill, “par for the course” scientific methodology with regard to the requirement for the verification of the authenticity of any/all photographic “evidence” used to support her D.E.W. / Erin hypothesis to date. No Concerted Photographic or Video Authentication Procedure Was Ever Attempted by Prof. Wood -[Nor by any other 9/11 researcher with “scientific” credentials.] As well as the misrepresentations and blatant omissions that I have drawn attention to in parts 2 and 3 of this report, and no differently from the other “scientific” 9/11 researchers with an apparent formal scientific education and resulting credentials [e.g. Steven Jones and Richard Hall ] , Prof. Wood has never made any serious, concerted effort to verify the authenticity of any of the videos or photos she has used as evidentiary proofs for her hypothesis, either on her website , or in her latest book .