Daily Archives: February 5, 2016

Lottery confusion

Be the 1st to vote.

Before fakeology, I just assumed some of the hicks who won the lottery were plain stupid.

Now, since I think most mega lottery winners are hoaxes, I believe that if they use an actor to portray a winner, it’s easier to simulate their death or bankruptcy to write them out of their public role of deception.

Did a Powerball winner overdose on cocaine while surrounded by hookers and die? Was a Georgia lottery winner murdered in his own home? Is there a lottery curse? These are just a few of the questions that have been taking over social media lately.

Source: Did A Powerball Winner Overdose And Die? Was A Lottery Winner Murdered? Lottery Curse Explored

No tags for this post.

Site notes

Be the 1st to vote.

Two site related updates:

I am auditioning disqus.com for comments, in an effort to help with the way comments work here and also allow outsiders to have their say. It allows voting of comments as well and is widely used around the internet – and is not facebook (yet)!

Forums.fakeologist.com will still need a fakeologist login, but disqus has their own login. Once I recognize you, I’ll whitelist you so your comments won’t have to wait to be approved.

Sadly, this means many logins for the site. I appreciate if you could use a username that is similar in forums, chat, and comments if possible.

I am experimenting with bitcoin. I don’t know much about it, but am trying to find an anonymous tipping system that has some sticking power on the internet. Previous site tiptheweb.com seems to have stopped working.

Scroll down on the right side of this page to find my bitcoin address and a chrome plugin to send and detect sites with bitcoin addresses.

Send a tip via bitcoin: 1AbtFp1QcH24nW2VFZcf9rp74bcoDkuPfm Try this app to tip websites: chrome.google.com…

I’d appreciate if someone could try and send a micropayment to see if it works. Email me at ima@fakeologist.com and let me know if you try. I’m doing this because I have always believed in micropayments for websites but so far no-one has figured out how to do it easily. This should be the future of media – micropaying for good content.

A price of a cup of coffee or donut for a weeks worth of work is reasonable and may help ensure content you like continues.

No tags for this post.

Another (near the) WTC collapse

Be the 1st to vote.

Debris and a mangled crane lie in a street in Lower Manhattan following a deadly collapse on Feb. 5.Another collapse in Lower Manhattan, perhaps as a sort of birthday tribute to dear Simon?

In his honor, analyse and discuss for fakery. I see dusted cars, blurred out licence plates, etc.

One person died and two were seriously injured when a crane collapsed Friday morning in Lower Manhattan, smashing the roofs of parked cars, authorities said.The crane landed across an intersection and stretched much of a block in the Tribeca neighbourhood, about 10 blocks north of the World Trade Centre. There was damage to the roof of a nearby building, and debris littered the street.

Source: One dead, two hurt as crane collapses in Lower Manhattan | Toronto Star

Update: Silly stories emerging, courtesy of psy-newservice Reuters:


“We could hear the bar shake. It was just scary cause things have been scary since 9/11,” said Pillay’s sister, 21-year-old Kuvanya, as they stood blocks from City Hall, wondering how they would make it through the debris to the wedding on time.

Nesh Pillay


No tags for this post.

Happy birthday Simon!

Be the 1st to vote.

Scientific sunshine shadow test to blow away the 9/11 smoke screen. What a lovely birthday present!

Yes, we have long demonstrated – beyond reasonable doubt & in countless methods & manners – that the entire pool of extant 9/11 imagery is entirely phony and that the 9/11 hoax / “magic trick” was pulled off primarily thanks to the prefabricated “Made-for-TV-Hollywood-movie” (sold to this world’s population) as “real / authentic news broadcasts”. However, it appears that the debate is still raging (around the “truther interwebs”), what with many folks having (quite understandable) problems understanding HOW exactly this was achieved. Most people try to make sense out of the imagery which, itself, makes no sense at all – and that’s why we see very little progress in waking up our fellow earthlings to the Grand 9/11 Hoax.Now, please know that I was myself extremely skeptical of – and even irritated by – the early imagery analyses making the rounds on the internets regarding the WTC collapses. I thought they were just silly. Especially those who claimed that “evil faces had been drawn in the smokeplumes”. I reasoned that (as most rational people would ‘reason’): with enough fantasy, your mind can make out ANY pattern you like within a given / random smokeplume – much like anyone can “see” elephant-shapes (or whatnot) in cloud formations and such. Well, knowing what I know now – as to the psychopathic nature of the Nutwork (“our ruling class”) I’m not so sure anymore about that. Here’s something “my mind imagined” while looking again at a fairly high-resolution animation (released only in 2010) of the “WTC1 collapse”- Please understand that all I have done here (“photoshopping-wise”) is to tweak some color levels of the pixels contained in these frames – and little else. I will ask you all to make your minds up for yourselves – as to the possible (or not) ‘random nature’ of this drifting “WTC1 smokeplume”:

Source: View topic – CGI collapse footage • Cluesforum.info

No tags for this post.