Does Bart Sibrel do more harm than good? Why would the a$$-true-NOTs agree or even disagree to an interview with him?
This is the very nature of controlled opposition. If anyone like you or me went up to them, you would be ignored or shooed away. After watching what Bart goes through, it’s even less likely that you’d bother?
Even though I liked Bart’s work as a fakeologist, the average reaction towards Bart is negative and sympathetic to the sad old masons being asked to swear on a bible they’ve long renounced.
No tags for this post.