Are sex changes science fiction?

Be the 1st to vote.

Miles Mathis thinks so … and so do I. I certainly don’t think the state should pay for them, since sex is a behavior issue to me. That means only very  rich people can afford them, and they’ve got other things to do with their money.

Where would one find a doctor? Good surgeons get good by repeating the same surgeries thousands of times – so who do they practice on? The more thought one gives this very fringe and distasteful subject, the more it falls apart under scrutiny.

In other words, as highlighted by the Bruce Gender psyOp, its point is to disrupt the orderly way of nature and to create yet another divisive social construct.

While we are on the subject—and while I am disbelieving now everything I have been told—I am not so sure that we have been told the truth about sex change operations. Think of it this way: do you really believe trained surgeons are lopping off healthy, undiseased body parts just to suit someone’s body image? Wouldn’t that go against their Hippocratic oath? You know, do no harm. The actual phrase is “noxamvero et maleficium propulsabo”: “I will reject doing harm and mischief”. And yes, doctors still take this oath. I don’t doubt other parts of the story, but it seems strange that our hyperactive legal system would allow doctors to remove healthy genitals for cosmetic reasons. It doesn’t seem like something that would be legal. After all, these procedures are risky. Even straight women have died from botched boob jobs, which would seem to be one of the least invasive procedures. Once you start rebuilding genitals—which, after all, are also the locus of urination—the risk of complications goes way up. Just a few decades ago, they were throwing people in jail for homosexuality, and there are still some very strange laws on the books concerning anal sex between consenting heterosexuals. But we are supposed to believe that the lawmakers have reversed field to the extent that they now allow licensed surgeons to rebuild genitals and re-assign sex? It doesn’t add up. It looks the hectic swing from one species of madness to another, and since we have seen that much of the madness of the past century has been manufactured, I suggest this madness may be as well. Another thing that no one ever questions is the lumping in of transsexuality with homosexuality. We have the LGBT classification, which has never made any sense to me. What does the fourth category have to do with the first three? Most homosexuals are not any more sexually dysphoric than the rest of us. Most gays don’t want to be women, they just want to have sex with men. And most lesbians don’t want to be men. Many seem to be repulsed by men, so why would they wish to be one? I have talked to a lot of gays about this, and most seem as mystified by it as the rest of us. Some have said they don’t like being lumped in with trannies, because it may harm the cause just when they are making progress. A couple even suggested to me that may be the point, which I hadn’t thought of. In other words, what if the movement had been infiltrated with the goal of pushing it too far and creating a backlash? I do see some signs of that, so maybe—like everything else—it is not an accident. Something to think about. Just to be clear, I have nothing against cross-dressing or cross-identifying. Sexually, people can do whatever they wish and not offend me—as long as I don’t have to watch it. But when we see the government underwriting and seeming to promote not only gender re-assignment but radical body surgery, I get suspicious. It doesn’t seem like something the government should be doing, or would be doing, so it strains logic. Also a red flag is the fact that I am not allowed to question this. According to the current rules of social discourse, I am supposed to clap wildly for everything reported in the media as an advance, without looking closely at it. That by itself is a reason to look closely at it.

No tags for this post.

3 thoughts on “Are sex changes science fiction?

  1. Blue Moon

    I’m a big supporter of Miles and Fakeologist so I’m not posting this as an aggressive challenge, and I’m just a witness, not a licensed health care practitioner- But as a somewhat professional in the medical industry and a long time San Francisco resident and artist (which has allowed me to cross paths with an incredible number of people of wildly divergent experiences) I can say first hand that sex reassignment all the way to genital restructuring is very real and not terribly hard to come by, even for people of limited income- Yes, the PTB are clearly promoting this asexual/non fertile agenda, likely as has been assumed by many as a multi-front war on human reproduction in order to cull the herd, as it were- But, I can also attest to the fact that doctors are in no way in lockstep with some altruistic notion of “do no harm”, which in my opinion is as susceptible to ideological presumption as any other maxim- What does it mean to “do no harm” when the self same doctors routinely prescribe addictive drugs that in many cases do far worse damage than the (often) misdiagnosed “disease” they are supposedly treating-
    Transgender people are what they are and I would never dispute their claims of who they think they are- It’s their head and their life and I’m in no position to impose my own ideological presumptions on them- It may be madness, but unless people treat sex changes the way some mad men allegedly treat abortion doctors by killing them, this phenomenon will continue, at least in the largely make believe world of media hype-

    1. Fakeologist

      No challenge taken. I suppose if any city has experience with this topic it would be SF. Perhaps MM is there to confuse or take extreme positions to provoke.Either way he makes one think!

      1. Blue Moon

        I think MM has a swagger that hides some insecurities- It’s his strength and weakness- Consider that he publicly severed his ties with Clues and I’m certain it was because Hoi dissed his paintings- That’s just the view of an armchair shrink/painter (I have ice water in my veins when it comes to criticism of my work) but it seems consistent with certain artistic temperaments- That said, I am still willing to bet he’s genuine- That said, his Beer Hall Putsch paper was a little under cooked- That said, I’m doing my own Hitler research so maybe I’m insecure….Heh…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. logo

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.